It's about fucking time the COD bubble burst with reviewers. I'm sure the game is fun and all, but how many very similar sequels can you get away with year after year before people get burnt out?
Not this game, but if reception continues to deteriorate; eventually, the franchise will suffer in sales.Bad reviews will not hinder the majority of consumers to buy a COD game.
People always tell me fast food is bad for my health but I'll always stand in line for the next Mc'D burger.
The reviews haven't burst; they've been on the decline. It's just now that it has become obvious.It's about fucking time the COD bubble burst with reviewers. I'm sure the game is fun and all, but how many very similar sequels can you get away with year after year before people get burnt out?
CoD reviews always seem like they're just a waste of everyone's time, especially when they're embargoed until launch. Hell, people here have been playing it for nearly 24 hours already. These reviews aren't going to convince anyone who's already decided to get CoD anyway, be it gamer or dudebro. If anything, it just seems like going through the motions (with a sprinkle of pretension) for the reviewers and something to spectate if you aren't into the series.
That said, and this is anecdotal, the game hasn't been selling as well. I wonder if it's people just waiting for next gen or people just getting franchise fatigue.
After 4 slightly different CODs, the games media has realised they're getting the same game every year?
After 4 slightly different CODs, the games media has realised they're getting the same game every year?
Unfortunately, for the industry to be healthy COD needs to be good. Let's hope that next year they can come back with something strong.
This is the greatest thing I've ever seen..LOL
Not this game, but if reception continues to deteriorate; eventually, the franchise will suffer in sales.The reviews haven't burst; they've been on the decline. It's just now that it has become obvious.
Shinobi, care to update this review thread of yours?
People who aren't around shouldn't make threads like those that needs to be constantly updated.
People who aren't around when it's important shouldn't make threads like those that needs to be constantly updated.
lol is it really that big of a deal to you
Titanfalls timing is just so perfect
no launch fps from ms
following up a shit halo
another garbage killzone on ps4 and nothing in the spring
bungie getting delays
and now a shit COD
the fps market will be so thirsty in March
Cod has never been ambitious, unless you call adding skinnerbox functionality to the 4th game ambitious (lol)
it started off as a medal of honor AA clone ffs
They never bothered to improve the movement , come up with a good spawn system or anything
laziest most formulaic sequels next to fifa since 2003.
lol is it really that big of a deal to you
Titanfalls timing is just so perfect
no launch fps from ms
following up a shit halo
another garbage killzone on ps4 and nothing in the spring
bungie getting delays
and now a shit COD
the fps market will be so thirsty in March
Titanfalls timing is just so perfect
no launch fps from ms
following up a shit halo
another garbage killzone on ps4 and nothing in the spring
bungie getting delays
and now a shit COD
the fps market will be so thirsty in March
OP needs to do his job
it´s annoying that you have to go through a whole thread to find the scores.. they should always be in the OP..
I honestly think if you call a thread "review thread" you should be around to update it.
You're clearly not familiar with Lunchbox' posting styleWhat are you basing that off fool?
There's only one review so far? When are we expecting the rest?
There's only one review so far? When are we expecting the rest?
Gameblog gave it 4/5There's only one review so far? When are we expecting the rest?
Give him half an hour, or PM a mod to make a new thread and close this one if either of you want to update it yourself.
You're clearly not familiar with Lunchbox' posting style
from playing killzone 1-3What are you basing that off fool?
the fps market will be so thirsty in March
Modern Warfare 3's Metacritic score for the PS3 and Xbox 360 stand at 88. In comparison, Black Ops 2's Metacritic score was at 83 for the PS3 and Xbox 360 and 81 for the Wii U version.I don't know, I thought Blops 2 was better received than MW3. How are their metacritic scores at the end of the day?
Call of Duty Ghosts Current Gen vs Next Gen comparison video by IGN and a ton of PS4 CODG gameplay videos went live in IGN's Youtube chanel
Joystick 3.5/5: http://m.joystiq.com/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-ps4-review-g794d21b/?icid=(1:3)
IGN 8.8/10: http://m.ign.com/articles/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-review
Edge 7/10: http://m.edge-online.com/review/call-of-duty-ghosts-review
Eurogamer 7/10: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-11-05-call-of-duty-ghosts-review
Ps4 suffers from frame rate drops apparently...wonder how the xbone version will shape up
http://www.joystiq.com/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-ps4-review-g794d21b/
from playing killzone 1-3
I don't have to delude myself into thinking trash like killzone is anything but mediocre drivel since my ps4 has bf4 coming with it. that will hold my fps needs fine until titanfall takes over in march
Ps4 suffers from frame rate drops apparently...wonder how the xbone version will shape up
http://www.joystiq.com/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-ps4-review-g794d21b/
So from playing old games you can automatically deduce that the next installment is going to be average? Pretty pathetic don't you think? Then what if the best thing since slice bread "Titanfall" gets average reviews what are you going to do then?
from playing killzone 1-3
I don't have to delude myself into thinking trash like killzone is anything but mediocre drivel since my ps4 has bf4 coming with it. that will hold my fps needs fine until titanfall takes over in march