I don't agree with that either. Just because women are predominately the victims, doesn't to me equate to it being sourced from a general hatred for women. I can't think what about seeing a celebrity naked means you dislike them, in fact, it seems like it's the opposite, people think JLaw is exceptionally attractive, and wish to see her naked. They don't want to see her harmed, or eating from a dog food dish or whatever misogynist imagery people favor. It doesn't seem to come from a place of hatred, rather one of lust. It's certainly related to the objectification of women, but is that in of itself related to 'hating' them?
I think if you believe yourself to be more likely to be a victim of a crime, then you should go to greater lengths than the average person to avoid being a victim. To use the locking the door analogy again. If you live in a middle class neighborhood, but have little to no possession of value, your need for security and insurance is far less than someone with lots of valuables living in a working class neighborhood.
Does that suck? Of course. Is it 'unfair'? Yes. But is it naive to ignore those factors because the crime itself is the bad thing, not your attempt to avoid it? Yes.
Of course the person who did this is the criminal, and he should be punished, but will that change what happened? Will these photos not exist? Will whatever emotional pain this caused these women disappear? Prevention is objectively superior to the restitution after a crime, so people should value the prevention highly.
