gutter_trash
Banned
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
garbage cartoon
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
This is why I can't stand current YouTube culture/the community, that entire community down just feels like one steep slope down to bottom of the barrel content, I've been maintaining for awhile and trying to explain to people that by supporting these channels that they're helping to cultivate the next generation of rightwingers that are going to be actively fighting against you/general progress.That whole thread is bleach for the mind... it burns just reading
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
I know you're a moderate because you're not from the US where moderates can be actually level-headed, but there are plenty of moderates in the US that do that.garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
Yea, they do. But with things like this, it just doesn't sit well with me and it would bother me way too much. Maybe later I'd reconsider, but not right now.
In truth, moderates lean towards the klansmen, but won't admit to it.
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis on this particular page of this thread
In truth, moderates lean towards the klansmen, but won't admit to it.
I won't put the blame on them but I wonder if this will influence how they approach these cases going forward. Will they continue to defend these rights knowing what the outcome will lead to because the intentions are very clear?
What exactly happened here?Oh also the Virginia ACLU twitter account was repeating 4chan lies and then had to delete and apologise
Yes because they always have.
I doubt the ACLU believes they share any culpability
Looking at how canadian hate speech laws are worded, I could easily see them being used to suppress legitimate groups in the hands of the wrong people
They just keep their mouths shut or use weasel words to try not to offend anyone
Worse off, though, is that moderates enable hate groups by staying quiet and refusing to take sides. Whenever there's a hate group vs marginalized people, the marginalized people always get screwed by the cowardice of moderates.
Absolutely. This was what the people they were arguing against warned of. They don't get to pretend this was unanticipated.Should they though?
We defeated the Nazis once we'll do it again.
And LOL at their Tiki torches
do they really?
have they "comprimised" with them at all? who are these "moderates" you speak of?
name me "modereates" who advocate for comprimise with the Trump admin
The term ”clashes" is a term designed to obscure blame, presenting a picture of two equal sides engaging in violent activities. Reading ”one dead" after ”clashes" at a white nationalist rally gives us no idea who died, or who did the killing.
Alternatively, one can veil responsibility by attributing agency to an inanimate object and disembodied emotions.
the only 2 Republican "moderates" in the Senate have voted AGAINST Trump's attempts to Repeal Obamacareum, literally thousands of people?
In truth, moderates lean towards the klansmen, but won't admit to it.
FAIR.org | For Media, Driving Into a Crowd of Protesters Is a Clash
Washington Post, Boston Globe, AOL News, The Hill, BBC and Sky News UK describe today's events not as a terrorist driving into a crowd of people but rather as a "clash".
The New York Times pushes the ridiculousness further and places blame on an inanimate object.
that's shameful especially from left-leaning outlets
do they really?
have they "comprimised" with them at all? who are these "moderates" you speak of?
name me "modereates" who advocate for comprimise with the Trump admin
So where's all the pewd stans today?
FAIR.org | For Media, Driving Into a Crowd of Protesters Is a Clash
Washington Post, Boston Globe, AOL News, The Hill, BBC and Sky News UK describe today's events not as a terrorist driving into a crowd of people but rather as a "clash".
The New York Times pushes the ridiculousness further and places blame on an inanimate object.
Absolutely. This was what the people they were arguing against warned of. They don't get to pretend this was unanticipated.
They can say that fighting for unrestricted free speech is worth the risk. But not that that they bear no responsibility.
we're talking about moderates in general not senators?the only 2 Republican "moderates" in the Senate have voted AGAINST Trump's attempts to Repeal Obamacare
besides Murkowski and Collins, there is not such thing as a Republican "moderate", the rest are Conservative Republicans
There are no left-leaning outlets in the US.
I'm talking about the so called moderate that stays quiet and lets the nazis fester because saying something and choosing sides may mean they can't be friends with everyone.
I believe accepted Neogaf term is 'The Boogies'. The middle is swell, gais!
FAIR.org | For Media, Driving Into a Crowd of Protesters Is a Clash
Washington Post, Boston Globe, AOL News, The Hill, BBC and Sky News UK describe today's events not as a terrorist driving into a crowd of people but rather as a "clash".
The New York Times pushes the ridiculousness further and places blame on an inanimate object.
do they really?
have they "comprimised" with them at all? who are these "moderates" you speak of?
name me "modereates" who advocate for comprimise with the Trump admin
Have you been in a coma? Its moderate 101.
In truth, moderates lean towards the klansmen, but won't admit to it.
Undecided voters at election time just for starters. As far as GAF, the "listen to them, debate them, this is why Trump won, so much for the tolerant left, etc" crowd. I mean for christs sake what do you think the whole Boogie "isn't the middle a great place to be" thing is exactly?
FAIR.org | For Media, Driving Into a Crowd of Protesters Is a Clash
Washington Post, Boston Globe, AOL News, The Hill, BBC and Sky News UK describe today's events not as a terrorist driving into a crowd of people but rather as a "clash".
The New York Times pushes the ridiculousness further and places blame on an inanimate object.
garbage cartoon
no moderate has advocated for "comprimise" with the Trump administaration or with Neo-Nazis
Undecided voters at election time just for starters. As far as GAF, the "listen to them, debate them, this is why Trump won, so much for the tolerant left, etc" crowd. I mean for christs sake what do you think the whole Boogie "isn't the middle a great place to be" thing is exactly?
typicla Fringe-Left nonesense.
"uhh uhhuhuhuhuh moderates are sympathaizers" nonense
FAIR.org | For Media, Driving Into a Crowd of Protesters Is a ‘Clash'
Washington Post, Boston Globe, AOL News, The Hill, BBC and Sky News UK describe today's events not as a terrorist driving into a crowd of people but rather as a "clash".
The New York Times pushes the ridiculousness further and places blame on an inanimate object.
Watch as the so called liberal media refuses to call the driver a terrorist and makes no obvious comparisons to terrorist behavior commonly exhibited oversease.