That did not happen.
A comparison was made between how we view a man and an institution, each having done bad and good. It's easy to handwave the villainy of the institution, but it is harder to do so for the man. If that triggers cognitive dissonance, then good.
How does trying to protect the people who attend their church and the surrounding area equal villainy? Maybe before the other information came out but now we know it is actually a sanitation issue and that the church is helping them fix it. The shelter itself is staying put they are just looking for a better location for the food service. Seems like a pretty good solution to me.