Dipindots said:
1) How did you acquire your christian faith? Were you born into christianity or did you "find God" through other means?
Family raised me in it in the evangelical tradition, which pretty much ruined me and made me massively dickish and insecure. When you think that the world is going to end any minute and your friends are all going to hell and sex is wrong and you shouldn't have self-esteem because it's a secular liberal creation to take you off reliance from God, you tend to become a bad person. This all went against everything my brain was telling me, because I was interested in science since my childhood, and I was always at the top of my class, so I understood how critical thinking worked. Eventually I took to reading/thinking for myself and secretly led my own religious life for a few years before I officially broke from my parents' church. I now consider myself nondenominational but I go to a Methodist church. You'd probably think that after all that I'd have turned atheist, and for a while I tried out agnosticism, but both of them just felt meaningless. I read up on Buddhism, Islam, Messianic Judaism, etc. but kept finding various things about them that I didn't like. Liberal Christianity (and to an extent socialism) was the only ideology/creed that appealed to me. It's too beautiful for me to dismiss, as irrational as that sounds. But then again, I like Kierkegaard, and the knight of faith immediately grabbed me.
2) Other than your faith, how do you cope with the substantial evidence that contradicts both the beliefs and many texts of the bible? To expand on this question, there are quite a few glaring paradoxes that can be found in the bible, namely to creation and even with God's benevolence. When people bring up these paradoxes to you... how do you respond?
I agree with them, because the Bible isn't a divinely inspired holy text, it's just a collection of various writings by various authors with various opinions on various subjects, from various places over various eras of time. I'm really interested in textual criticism and all that though, so while that often shoots holes through the Bible, it also seems to indicate to me that there's a solid basis for at least the New Testament. And the apostles went through a whole hell of a lot of suffering with pretty much no hope of worldly reward for
something (I know that's not necessarily indicative that they were correct, but it's always something I've found both interesting and inspiring).