But V already had the strategic view for that. It just reeks of being cheap, as if the strategy genre or the series itself isn't worth investing proper graphics for.
I don't think anything about it looks cheap...?
But V already had the strategic view for that. It just reeks of being cheap, as if the strategy genre or the series itself isn't worth investing proper graphics for.
Are there places that offer pre-order discount? Was surprised Steam isn't giving one.
I don't think anything about it looks cheap...?
Green Man Gaming are offering a 'massive' 10% off.
It's a pity I won't have time to play this at release
What does this even mean? That it didn't require any effort to create?look cheap, look cheap
I just pre-ordered from Kinguin for around $45.Are there places that offer pre-order discount? Was surprised Steam isn't giving one.
Are there places that offer pre-order discount? Was surprised Steam isn't giving one.
Putting aside the graphics discussion, have they confirmed how ranged units work? I'm beginning to get the impression all ranged units now have a range of 1 rather than 2 based on the previews so far. That might go a long way to fixing some of the balance issues.
Huh, I'm actually quite pleased with the new visual style. Makes everything easier to identify at a glance.
I just pre-ordered from Kinguin for around $45.
20% off on Gamesplanet, plus 5% I believe if you link your Steam account. Legit site, keys from publisher.
Putting aside the graphics discussion, have they confirmed how ranged units work? I'm beginning to get the impression all ranged units now have a range of 1 rather than 2 based on the previews so far. That might go a long way to fixing some of the balance issues.
err what
Civ 4's map is more detailed
https://emeraldtablet.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/civ4screenshot0111.jpg[IMG]
maybe you guys mean CivRev?
[IMG]http://www.gamesknit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/sid-meier-civilization-revolution-screen.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Uh base Civ 4 definitely does not look like that. Pretty sure that's using Blue Marble or some other similar graphics mod.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/8jd1GPB.jpg
This is what Civ 4 actually looks like in normal play.
Actually comparing the two CIv 6 modelling looks to be deliberately a lot less "rustic" and cleaner, more like a painting than something trying to model the real world. Nevertheless, the landscaping and most importantly the color design are very similar in both.
Both are significantly more suited to this type of game than Civ 5's art style, that's for sure.
I just pre-ordered from Kinguin for around $45.
Uh base Civ 4 definitely does not look like that. Pretty sure that's using Blue Marble or some other similar graphics mod.
![]()
This is what Civ 4 actually looks like in normal play.
Actually comparing the two CIv 6 modelling looks to be deliberately a lot less "rustic" and cleaner, more like a painting than something trying to model the real world. Nevertheless, the landscaping and most importantly the color design are very similar in both.
Both are significantly more suited to this type of game than Civ 5's art style, that's for sure.
this is what it looks like in BTS unmodded in my game
![]()
closer to Civ V than VI, complete with grainy textures that made trees more detailed as well as hills and mountains, which was my original point, so not sure how you are able to compare it to VI
again, CivRev looks closer to it
you're kidding right
Simple meshes and low-res textures lacking detail, how is that not cheap? It looks like a mobile game, not a PC game.
Green Man Gaming are offering a 'massive' 10% off.
The trees look incredibly cheap. The mountains look cheap too actually.
Not sure if anyone has seen this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_8LoR4zLVE
Short-ish playthrough with IGN. It shows some gameplay which I didn't know about, or maybe I just forgot.
Open Borders - Until a specific civic tech, anyone can pass through anyone's borders freely, though if you attempt to pass through into another Civ's territory, you won't declare war, but they may not like it.
To the poster above about the ranged attack, they show an archer unit with 2 range.
Cities can defend themselves from attack but cannot ranged attack until they build fortifications like walls.
I think you're right.Isn't it because of the civ's initial meeting and you get an option to "visit" that other civ's city?
The trees look incredibly cheap. The mountains look cheap too actually.
![]()
Compare that to this.
![]()
Simple meshes and low-res textures lacking detail, how is that not cheap? It looks like a mobile game, not a PC game.
Isn't it because of the civ's initial meeting and you get an option to "visit" that other civ's city?
You say it looks cheap, I say it looks more vibrant. Different strokes.
They mention it in the video. When you "visit" you just get sight of it, something different to the open borders
If you find their borders, you'll get to see their capital city,
if they find your borders, you can show them your capital city,
if you both meet each other, both of you can see each other's capital city
The trees look incredibly cheap. The mountains look cheap too actually.
![]()
Compare that to this.
![]()
Welp, bought the Digital Deluxe edition through local price.
it's apparently 60 USD when converted, give or take. How is the American price in comparison?
$60 for base game, $80 for digital deluxe
Don't want to derail the thread, but this is one of those franchises I've always admired from a distant and I can't decide if I should wait to jump in with VI or if there would be a benefit to grabbing 5 first in the mean time. 5 is still going for $30 on steam btw.
For what it's worth I decided to jump in with V a couple weeks ago, with the thought that VI like V will likely take an expansion or two to really come into its own so I'm ok with waiting awhile to pick it up. That being said I have no interest in the multiplayer which could certainly affect your choice.
Civ V is an awesome game and Civ VI will not change that. What you probably will be missing is on the social aspect. Once Civ VI is released, everybody will be talkng about the game, so you will be left out of it. Besides, many people will be joining the fry for the first time with VI and they will be asking questions too, so maybe that's a better place to start. On the other hand, people know Civ V in and out and can help. There're tons of videos with extensive Civ V info as well as play throughs.Don't want to derail the thread, but this is one of those franchises I've always admired from a distant and I can't decide if I should wait to jump in with VI or if there would be a benefit to grabbing 5 first in the mean time. 5 is still going for $30 on steam btw.
Any nice physical editions of this for PC? Game have standard for 50 quid!
how frequent do they add new civs for videos
Ignoring the visual style that I love to complain about, Civ V + God and Kinds + Brave New World is definitely gonna be better than base Civ VI.
It's not a fair comparison at all.