perfectchaos007
Member
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Interested to see how this plays out in the polls.Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Because some people just don't know how to let shit go.
Nobody is surprised that the DNC would favor Clinton.Is anyone really surprised at this point after the previous DNC leak? They wanted Clinton to win and conspired to do so.
She needs to resign as Chair after the election, if she haven't yet. This is mess up, and making the DNC look bad.
I don't buy the idea that there's gonna be some groundswell of support against her from angry Sanders supporters who were hiding out somewhere sorry. In fact I don't believe this story makes it beyond the 8th if nothing happens before then.
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Nobody is surprised that the DNC would favor Clinton.
Bernie was literally running against the DNC (establishment).
Now favoring is different from "conspiring", or actual rigging, which Bernie supporters often imply. There is 0 actual proof that the voting itself was influenced, obviously.
Clinton won the primaries by a wide margin, and being linked to many several issues (realism of policy and financing, bi partisan work and being able to maneuver around/ with opposition have been big ones, for me at least).
Nobody is surprised that the DNC would favor Clinton.
Bernie was literally running against the DNC (establishment).
Now favoring is different from "conspiring", or actual rigging, which Bernie supporters often imply. There is 0 actual proof that the voting itself was influenced, obviously.
Clinton won the primaries by a wide margin, and being linked to many several issues (realism of policy and financing, bi partisan work and being able to maneuver around/ with opposition have been big ones, for me at least).
Maybe the DNC is just that bad if two chairs in a row are like this.
Maybe... I think it could effect undecideds who decide the "she's corrupt" narrative to be true.
I know I think it is.
Maybe she only shared two questions cause it's all she could get? You know damn well she'd have given the Clinton folks the whole set if she could.
She's the interim DNC chair because the former chair had to resign after being caught favoring the Clinton campaign. The same day Clinton hired her to some honorary position within her campaign.Legitimate question, is her job at the DNC not full time or are you just being a smart ass.
Please. Stop fooling yourself into thinking that whether or not she knew about two questions made any difference. Clinton is that nerdy student who spends hours and hours studying for the tests, aces those tests, then gets accused by underperforming students of only having done so well due to cheating.
This wasn't some curveball question. This was something that any politician paying attention would have known how to answer.
Sad how far some will go to convince themselves otherwise but you're exactly right.She was given the question anyways. A nerdy cheater is still a cheater. Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
You americans have two shitty candidates.
Please. Stop fooling yourself into thinking that whether or not she knew about two questions made any difference. Clinton is that nerdy student who spends hours and hours studying for the tests, aces those tests, then gets accused by underperforming students of only having done so well due to cheating.
This wasn't some curveball question. This was something that any politician paying attention would have known how to answer.
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
Sad how far some will go to convince themselves otherwise but you're exactly right.
DNC is shady, probably need fresh faces to run it.
We really don't. We have one horrendously bad candidate and another that we know more about than probably any other in the history of presidential campaigns because of these leaks. I can't even fathom what might have been going on behind the scenes of previous campaigns but all of this stuff seems like the kind of scandals you'd expect from a student body president election.She was given the question anyways. A nerdy cheater is still a cheater. Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
You americans have two shitty candidates.
She was given the question anyways. A nerdy cheater is still a cheater. Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
You americans have two shitty candidates.
Why are you so focussed on what the content of the question was rather than the fact that a question was shared? x+3=4 is an easy to solve equation, but if someone would tell me the answer to this question prior to a test, it would still be cheating.
Because fresh faces are much less biased.
Let's just make the standard that everyone gets all of the questions in advance. This should be a non-issue.
Hilary and friends have made a ton of progress winning over former Bernie voters since she clinched the nomination. This revelation may be a giant step backwards and Bernie voters may be pissed again
I'm not and a large group of fellow afterberners I am in contact with are not as well. Granted, my support went to Trump as soon as I saw these emails (among other revelations provided by Wikileaks) I didn't need CNN to force her to resign in order to pull away from voting third party and vote for Trump.Do Bernie voters suddenly prefer a narcissistic tyrant in the WH? I think they're ok with this 'revelation'.
She was given the question anyways. A nerdy cheater is still a cheater. Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
You americans have two shitty candidates.
The interim DNC chair feeds questions to a single candidate after the previous DNC chair was forced to resign due to favoring that same candidate and people in these parts still can't understand how this undermined a presidential primary race?
FAT CHECK: We have far more than two.She was given the question anyways. A nerdy cheater is still a cheater. Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
You americans have two shitty candidates.
FAT CHECK: We have far more than two.
FAT CHECK: We have far more than two.
Donald Trump isn't that fat.FAT CHECK: We have far more than two.
Please. Stop fooling yourself into thinking that whether or not she knew about two questions made any difference. Clinton is that nerdy student who spends hours and hours studying for the tests, aces those tests, then gets accused by underperforming students of only having done so well due to cheating.
This wasn't some curveball question. This was something that any politician paying attention would have known how to answer.
Why do you think she had a privare server in her own house to be begin with?
I get into this argument with people all the time but really it's the fault of the political parties for framing their primaries as if they're the playoffs before the Super Bowl when they're really not. The primaries are essentially focus testing that the country participates in to help the parties vet their candidate. In 2008 Hillary failed that process when Obama emerged as the more marketable candidate. This time they pushed her much more aggressively and told pretty much everyone that it was her turn and to get out of the way but Bernie spurned that guidance which is why they did nothing to help him and continued to groom Hillary.The interim DNC chair feeds questions to a single candidate after the previous DNC chair was forced to resign due to favoring that same candidate and people in these parts still can't understand how this undermined a presidential primary race?
This is also true but easy to forget.FAT CHECK: We have far more than two.
Didn't this happen before Schwartz resigned?
A nerdy enough student would say "Hey professor, this test question was leaked to me in advance. I feel the fact that I was given the question is immoral and the one who gave it to me should be looked at."
When the two possibilities is a typical politician (in some ways that is - meaning, that yes, there is some dirty play obviously - but also not so typical in other ways - if you look at her history, it's pretty impressive in a lot of good ways) vs a pathological lying abuser monster, the winning of whom would be disastrous for the country and especially any minorities living in it in multiple ways, the choice is pretty clear for most of Bernie supporters.I don't know how any self respecting Bernie supporter could shove their morals under a rug and vote for Clinton. I know I'm not. This revelation about Brazille is just another in a long line of news about the primary.
I can somewhat understand how a person would choose not to vote Clinton in protest and vote 3rd party (though I do think it's silly to be honest), but to vote for Trump instead?I'm not and a large group of fellow afterberners I am in contact with are not as well. Granted, my support went to Trump as soon as I saw these emails (among other revelations provided by Wikileaks) I didn't need CNN to force her to resign in order to pull away from voting third party and vote for Trump.
This plus the reopening of the investigation of Pvt. Server has only reinforced my decision and again, a significant portion of former Bernie supporters I am still in contact with.
Are you saying she had a private server to cheat at the debates? I can never tell which Clinton haters are joke posters.
First off thank you for outing yourself as yet another one of those ridiculous "both sides are bad" types. I'm not going to go into the long ass list of why Hillary is not comparable to a dumbass like Trump, but I'm just going to let you know that you sound stupid for the "both sides are bad" bullshit.
Second, read my earlier analogy. It's not like she had a fucking earpiece with someone telling her how to answer. She simply got a tip that honestly probably made no difference considering she would have had a good answer to a flint question even if she didn't get the tip. If you think Hillary needed that tip to do well with that question, then you clearly don't know jack shit about Hillary Clinton.
Third, would you care to elaborate how she was "cheating" by using a private email server? Is it going to involve some ridiculous conspiracy theory about how Hillary Clinton only avoided indictment due to connections?
Better analogy would be that Donna told Hillary "hey the math test is going to have a question involving basic algebra".
She wasn't told by Donna how she needs to answer. She was told about what the question would be about.
And I'm focused because the whole "this is such rigging" argument implies that this tip actually made any significant difference.
This is actually what happened in the past, more or less. When someone mailed a video tape of GWB's debate prep sessions to Gore's debate prep chief, the guy promptly resigned from the campaign and turned over the tape to federal authorities. We still don't know if it was someone sympathetic to Gore trying to help the campaign or the Bush campaign deliberately trying to make the Gore campaign take the bait and then yell at them for cheating. Regardless, that's the above reproach way to deal with something like this.
The first response to this email should have been "Donna we appreciate the help but it's inappropriate for you to do this, and we're going to let the debate commission know we've been tipped off about this question".
Whats the common thread here? 2 DNC chairs caught favoring their candidate. For w.e they want Hilary and nobody else and yes as a Bernie fan that's incredibly frustrating. I'm still voting Hilary because the alternative is the apocalypse, but I can't stand how this all played out
Yep. That the campaign didn't do that is pretty awful.This is actually what happened in the past, more or less. When someone mailed a video tape of GWB's debate prep sessions to Gore's debate prep chief, the guy promptly resigned from the campaign and turned over the tape to federal authorities. We still don't know if it was someone sympathetic to Gore trying to help the campaign or the Bush campaign deliberately trying to make the Gore campaign take the bait and then yell at them for cheating. Regardless, that's the above reproach way to deal with something like this.
The first response to this email should have been "Donna we appreciate the help but it's inappropriate for you to do this, and we're going to let the debate commission know we've been tipped off about this question".
The private server has nothing to do with this.She knew what she was doing when she built that email server. You guys are so naive.
It may seem that America is fucked by having such horrible candidates. But do not worry, as dylan said we all gotta serve somebody
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6CwHby-YTNo