-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
College Football 2013 |Week 6| Kiffin Named Next AD of Texas
- Thread starter timetokill
- Start date
So many teams ahead of FSU were in line to lose today. Sigh.bucknuticus
Member
Didnt see anything to overutrn the call on the play, but probably the right call.
timetokill
Banned
How appropriate that the refs should ultimately decide this game
Rice-Eater
Member
It sure looks like it hit the ground, but I didn't think their was enough evidence to overturn the ruling on the field.
theprodigy
Member
ok ESPN, your angles show the ball hitting the ground
D
Deleted member 8095
Unconfirmed Member
You can blame them for a lot of the questionable penalties they called in this game, but overturning that play was correct. Ball was on the ground.
timetokill
Banned
Why should Washington drop in the rankings, ESPN? For barely losing on the road to a higher ranked team? Didn't that more likely imply the rankings are about right?
Dude. Enough with this same damn post. Your team will return to mediocrity again without him in all likelihood.
The fact that ball was incomplete was pretty clearly conclusive to me. You can see it hit the turf from that view behind him.
Actually it was a shit stain on the P10 before him for almost a decade. I am perfectly happy with Sark as the HC.
D
Deleted member 8095
Unconfirmed Member
By terrible special teams play, yes.
whaaat?
timetokill
Banned
I don't get it. Why do you want to get rid of the guy that made you guys relevant again?
It's not that you can see it hit the ground, but you can see the ball go through his arms.
It had nothing to do with the reviewed catch. He gave them short fields twice trying to do some retarded short kick bullshit that backfired both times. They got 14 points off of that.
Sark got shook off one blown kickoff return and played it scared the rest of the time.
D
Deleted member 8095
Unconfirmed Member
Damn, Shaw is a class act all the way.
Relevant is not the standard here. Anyone with a pulse could have gone 7-6 3 years in a row here. Tyrone was so bad that a career 7-6 coach is now getting defended over moral victories. Shake my fucking head.
bucknuticus
Member
God damn, estimated $300million+ exchanged on that fumble recovery at the end of the OSU game.
D
Deleted member 8095
Unconfirmed Member
Keith Price could be an NFL quarterback, guy plays with a ton of heart. Difficult even for a Coug to dislike him.
We should recall that a 10-2 or 9-3 season is still possible here. If you asked me if I would take that at the start of the year I would have signed up.
We'll lose to Oregon and UCLA at bare minimum if we keep playing like this. Probably ASU too.
If this game showed Stanford's true colors, you guys will absolutely roast them. They look very vulnerable.
timetokill
Banned
So how about a 9-3 season? Still not good enough? I'd say that's the most likely outcome for you guys this year.
You guys aren't gonna lose to ASU, and probably not to UCLA either. either way I really doubt it'll be both.
Some writer for ESPN.com interviewed him after the game and he gave a great answer about it. Basically boiled down to the fact that now the game is here, there can't be any concerns about looking ahead past other opponents to it. This kid is a pro at interviews -- Jimbo taught him well.
We won't be 9-3 if we keep playing like this. 8-4 at best.
theprodigy
Member
yeah, no
also what's with you making it sound like losing to Oregon on the road is a failure or something
sf2fanatic
Member
USC needs to see this post. They'll gladly take Sark off your hands
The backdoor cover to end all backdoor covers.
You should save some rage for when the Hawks lose on the same Wilson scramble 4th down completion that is overturned and the game is over. I am calling that outcome right now.
timetokill
Banned
So... improvement, right?
1) We play Oregon at home
2) Losing to Oregon is always a failure
Please forward it to Pat Haden
You can lose games in the NFL.
timetokill
Banned
No we wouldn't. Getting Sark would absolutely be a major loss for us.
There was a coach we're interested in at this game but it sure wasn't Sark
sf2fanatic
Member
It'll take a longshot to get Peterson. Unless you guys wanna do us crosstown rivals a favor and hire more ex raider coaches..lol
timetokill
Banned
I wasn't talking about Petersen, but we would like him too.
Not good enough.
That kind of thinking kept Tyrone around long enough to get us 0-12.
timetokill
Banned
Real talk: if you go 9-3 this year then you should be damn happy, and it's plenty good enough.
I fire Sark if we blow winnable games because of terrible coaching and penalties, like we have been for years.
We'd have to actually go 9-3 though.
Stanford isn't that good. I'm going to quote this post when Oregon beats them by 24.
Washington has competed for conference and national titles under multiple coaches, with only one prolonged downturn that ended in 2009. Any team with good talent can have incredible runs with the right coach, just like any team (USC right now, Bama right before Saban) can be cast into mediocrity with the wrong coach. USC should be happy with a bowl game and not getting blown out multiple times this year. Washington has the talent to compete for a conference title, coaching is what is stopping them. Your perspective is completely rooted in the recent past it seems. Washington is suffering because of a lack of discipline (coaching) and some really poor play calling. The only position group that is genuinely not prepared to win 10+ games is the offensive line, due to poor recruiting and development (on the coaches again).