Yeah, less competition! Yes! Who needs innovation!?
Yeah, less competition! Yes! Who needs innovation!?
If these were samsung's patents people would be in here saying how all is right in the world.
I doubt that. Apple just doesn't want people ripping off their ideas. I don't think they'd charge more for it.
FixedApple:![]()
Anyone with common sence![]()
Insulting a large number of GAF members twice. What a nice person you are.Hahaha go Apple, fuck you Android losers! The one true king has prevailed. The black rectangle is OURS
Insulting a large number of GAF members twice. What a nice person you are.
I doubt that. Apple just doesn't want people ripping off their ideas. I don't think they'd charge more for it.
I doubt that. Apple just doesn't want people ripping off their ideas. I don't think they'd charge more for it.
Insulting a large number of GAF members twice. What a nice person you are.
Come on man, how can you hate Scottie Pippen?
Samsung did this to themselves. What they did with the original Galaxy and Touchwiz was disgraceful and shouldn't be allowed in the United States. Companies get away with that stuff in the black market in Asia.
I am not an Apple fan or Apple user, but I've heard countless people mistake the Galaxy phones for iPhones. This case was a slam dunk for Apple. As a matter of fact I own 2 of the original Galaxy phones and it's laughable how much they went out of their way to make the things look like iOS and iPhone 3G.
I think it's very interesting to hear about how screwed up the patent system is once the verdict starts to be read. Very interesting indeed.
You can't confuse OSX and windows. At least no one I know has.God forbid consumers have a familiar UI on devices that are supposed to do the same thing.
I think it's very interesting to hear about how screwed up the patent system is once the verdict starts to be read. Very interesting indeed.
I like fun as much as the next person, but there was no need for that.So, what's the impact of this in Europe for example?
No fun allowed, eh?
The main thing that I've gotten from all this is that Samsung has an entire dictionary's worth of phone names
Yup, Silliest thing I have seen. Whomever wins, the consumer loses so I am not sure why people are happy about this.
Question 9 was Samsung willful in its infringement?
This is the big one
This reminds me of how people attach to trivial non-issues and boogeymen instead of discussing and resolving the big picture problems. Apple, Samsung, Google, etc are all companies living in a terrible world of bullshit patent law, and rooting one way or the other here ignores the real problems in order to have a good guy and a bad guy to help you mentally parse and compartmentalize your opinion.
Yeah that sentiment has certainly not been expressed at all on neogaf non-stop for months and years now.
Right, there's nobody in here who thinks that software patents in general are bullshit. Continue trolling.If these were samsung's patents people would be in here saying how all is right in the world.
When will we get a decent patent system? and how?
like I said, that 109 page document did them in. They admitted to copying many a things. As willful as it gets.Damn, willful infringement?
Samsung is screwed.