Court set to rule on Apple vs Samsung case in a few minutes

Status
Not open for further replies.
More than just nerds own these phones. This could effect the lives of a HUGE amount of people.

How? I'm not really seeing the big picture here other than the patent system being garbage.

Could you put this into layman's terms for me? What does it mean for people outside of the US?
 
Apple's claims. Utility claims against Samsung products -- claim 19 of the 381 patent. Answer for all is Yes
 
eagle-eyes.gif
 
"4:41 PM | by Josh Lowensohn
Apple's claims. Utility claims against Samsung products -- claim 19 of the 381 patent. Answer for all is Yes"

Well, shit.
 
3:42:41 PM PDT

Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Galasy Ace, Prevail, S 4G, S II, Galaxy Tab, The Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerie, Nexus S 4G, Replenish and Vibrant
3:42:07 PM PDT

STA yes for Captivate
3:42:03 PM PDT

for SEA, Galaxy Tab Wifi
3:41:43 PM PDT

Answer for all devices is YES
3:41:39 PM PDT

For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent
3:41:07 PM PDT

Apple's claims
 
for LTD: yes, for tab 10.1 WiFi America Inc. For Samsungs Telecom LLC -- yes for captivate, droid charge, Epic 4G, exhibit 4G, fascinate, galaxy ace, prevail, S4G, SII, Tab, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, mesmerize, Nexus S 4G, replenish, Vibrant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom