• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Covid 19 Thread: [no bitching about masks of Fauci edition]

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
What in the world happened to Dr. Campbell? The crazy leaps of logic he is taking in this video are quite something to behold.
Nothing happened to him. He's doing the same analysis as always.

"Crazy leaps of logic"? "Quite something to behold"? A little hyperbolic, don't you think?

What do you think is more likely? A credible guy who has been very consistent over the last year in his analysis and opinion all of a sudden goes bonkers? Or maybe you just don't like what he's saying?

From January 20, 2021 to April 28, 2021 36 (2.6%) of 1,497 observed fully vaccinated healthcare workers tested positive for COVID and 7 (~19%) of those reported persistent symptoms at 6 weeks out in the Israel study he is looking at. So around 20% got "long COVID," which basically matches the general population estimates, yet he strangely decides to twist all of that and instead divide by 1,497 to get a figure of around 0.47%. It makes zero sense to do this, especially when comparing against the widely cited figure that does not use the entire population as the denominator but only those who were infected, because that is the only thing that makes sense.

Makes zero sense? The observed group is 1,497 people. Of those 1,497 people, 7 of them came down with long COVID. i.e. Half a percent of the observed group came down with long COVID. That's a perfectly reasonable interpretation of the data since that's what it literally says.

Can you say that getting vaccinated reduces your chance of getting long COVID? Of course you can. Vaccination already reduces your chances of getting COVID to begin with, so unless the vaccine somehow makes already infected patients have a higher probability of getting long COVID, the vaccination should therefore reduce your overall chances of getting long COVID. Does vaccination somehow make already infected patients more susceptible to long COVID? That's unlikely but at this point unknown.

You're right that a more apples to apples (math wise) comparison would be better, since the 19% from the cited study only includes the infected, which is what the other studies that have long COVID data do. However, I don't know where Campbell is getting his first 10% from that he states in the beginning of the video, so I can't comment on that.

As far as what I know, this is what we know:


In a multistate telephone survey of symptomatic adults who had a positive outpatient test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 35% had not returned to their usual state of health when interviewed 2–3 weeks after testing. Among persons aged 18–34 years with no chronic medical conditions, one in five had not returned to their usual state of health.


Applying a weighting following the UK population (see Supplementary Methods) the estimated proportion of people experiencing symptomatic COVID-19 going on to suffer long-COVID were similar: 14.5%, 5.1% and 2.2% for 4, 8- and 12-weeks duration respectively. These estimates may still be conservative: whilst estimates could be inflated due to PCR testing in the first wave being restricted to those more severely unwell, or if regular logging may have encouraged more symptoms to be noticed, Long-COVID may here be underestimated if individuals with prolonged symptoms were more likely to stop logging symptoms on the app.


Among COVID-19 patients whose infections ranged from asymptomatic to severe, two problems -- fatigue and loss of smell or taste -- persisted most frequently, reported Helen Chu, MD, MPH, of University of Washington in Seattle, and co-authors, in a JAMA Network Open research letter.

"The effects of COVID-19 can linger far beyond acute infection, even in individuals who experienced mild illness," said co-author Denise McCulloch, MD, MPH, also of University of Washington.

"To our knowledge, this study presents the longest follow-up symptom assessment post-illness, with individuals surveyed out to 9 months after their COVID diagnosis," she told MedPage Today.

Earlier studies focused largely on long-term effects in hospitalized COVID patients, McCulloch noted. "Our study is unique in characterizing a group consisting of mostly outpatients: 90% of our cohort experienced only a mild COVID-19 illness, yet one-third continue to have lingering effects," she said.

Early in 2021, researchers in Wuhan, China, reported that 76% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients had at least one symptom that persisted 6 months after acute infection, mostly fatigue or muscle weakness. "Studies of non-hospitalized patients have shown that anywhere from 35% to 50% of non-hospitalized patients had symptoms 2 to 4 months later," Navis noted.


A survey earlier this month from the Office for National Statistics in Britain polled more than 20,000 participants who’d tested positive for Covid-19 in the last year and found that one in five survivors reported having symptoms after five weeks—and at 12 weeks, the number was still 13.7% (almost one in seven people). The most common symptoms experienced at five weeks were fatigue (11.8%), cough (11%), headache (10%), and muscle pain (7.7%). (Loss of taste and smell followed, each affecting about 6.3% of participants.) At 12 weeks, the prevalence of symptoms was slightly lower, but still distributed similarly and much higher than a control group who hadn’t had Covid-19.

In terms of the big picture, when the authors extrapolated the numbers to the whole of the UK, they suggest that more than a million residents may have experienced long Covid by the beginning of March 2021.

This would be the closest comparison to an overall population study, since if we assume a million people in UK had long COVID, and given 68 million UK citizens, that's about a 1.5% prevalence. Still higher than 0.5%. However, these numbers are very imprecise, and should be taken with a large grain of salt since the two populations compared are very different and the involve lots of assumptions.

A study out last week from the Karolinska Institute reported that among a group of healthcare workers who’d had mild Covid-19, 10% still had at least one symptom severe enough to impact their work, home, or social lives eight months later (the most common symptoms were loss of smell and taste, fatigue, and respiratory problems). While the study was quite small and the results should be interpreted with some caution, other studies have also suggested that even mild initial illness can lead to long-term effects.


Breakthrough infections resulting in long Covid-19 are "quite rare," said Dr. Greg Vanichkachorn, an occupational medicine specialist who works with post-Covid-19 syndrome patients at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Vanichkachorn's observation, while based only on what he's seen in the clinic, is echoed at other post-Covid-19 clinics.

Dr. Michele Longo, an assistant professor of neurology at Tulane University in New Orleans who works with long-haul patients, said she has not seen such patients following a breakthrough infection. Neither has Dr. Maureen Lyons, medical director of the Care and Recovery from Covid-19 Clinic at Washington University in St. Louis.

Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist, also at Washington University, is studying the effects of Covid-19 vaccination on the risk of long Covid-19. His research, which is not yet finished, looks at information on more than 5 million veterans within a Department of Veterans Affairs database, including 200,000 who were diagnosed with Covid-19.

"Of the people who get vaccinated and end up with a breakthrough infection, their risk of coming back to the clinic with some long Covid manifestation is very, very small," Al-Aly said.

So, lots of info out there that would suggest it helps.

Furthermore, this is a period of 14 weeks. You can't just take that and declare a percentage of likelihood, especially in light of what happened very soon afterwards in Israel with the Delta variant that we know infects the vaccinated at a vastly higher rate, nevermind any concerns of waning immunity over time.

You can declare a percentage of likelihood, as long as you qualify that it's only within the scope of the study, and acknowledge its limitations, which Campbell did.

This is a very strange and extremely misleading video.
No, it really isn't.

Also, there's is preliminary data that show that even post infection, vaccinations could possibly help long haulers.


Forty-four vaccinated participants were assessed at a median of 32 days (IQR 20-41) post vaccination with 22 matched unvaccinated participants. Most were highly symptomatic of Long Covid at 8 months (82% in both groups had at least 1 persistent symptom), with fatigue (61%), breathlessness (50%) and insomnia (38%) predominating. There was no significant worsening in quality-of-life or mental wellbeing metrics pre versus post vaccination. Nearly two-thirds (n=27) reported transient (<72hr duration) systemic effects (including fever, myalgia and headache).

When compared to matched unvaccinated participants from the same cohort, those who had receive a vaccine had a small overall improvement in Long Covid symptoms, with a decrease in worsening symptoms (5.6% vaccinated vs 14.2% unvaccinated) and increase in symptom resolution (23.2% vaccinated vs 15.4% unvaccinated) (p=0.035).


An estimated 10% to 30% of people who get COVID-19 suffer from lingering symptoms of the disease, or what's known as "long COVID."

Judy Dodd, who lives in New York City, is one of them. She spent nearly a year plagued by headaches, shortness of breath, extreme fatigue and problems with smell, among other symptoms.

Everything changed after she got her COVID-19 vaccine.

"I was like a new person, it was the craziest thing ever," says Dodd, referring to how many of her health problems subsided significantly after her second shot.

And she's not alone. As the U.S. pushes to get people vaccinated, a curious benefit is emerging for those with this post-illness syndrome: Their symptoms are easing and, in some cases, fully resolving after they get vaccinated.
In the absence of large studies, researchers are culling what information they can from patient stories, informal surveys and clinicians' experiences. For instance, about 40% of the 577 long COVID patients contacted by the group Survivor Corps say they felt better after getting vaccinated.
Griffin, who is running a long-term study of post-COVID illness, initially estimated that about 30% to 40% of his patients felt better. Now, he believes the number may be higher, as more patients receive their second dose and see further improvements.

"We've been sort of chipping away at this [long COVID] by treating each symptom," he says. "If it's really true that at least 40% of people have significant recovery with a therapeutic vaccination, then, to date, this is the most effective intervention we have for long COVID."
A small U.K. study, not yet peer-reviewed, found about 23% of long COVID patients had an "increase in symptom resolution" post-vaccination, compared to about 15% of those who were unvaccinated.
But not all clinicians are seeing the same level of improvement.

Clinicians at post-COVID clinics at the University of Washington in Seattle, Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, National Jewish Health in Denver and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center tell NPR that so far, a small number of patients — or none at all — have reported feeling better after vaccination, but it wasn't a widespread phenomenon.

"I've heard anecdotes of people feeling worse, and you can scientifically come up with an explanation for it going in either direction," says UCSF's Deeks.

Indeed, doctors and online surveys also have found that a smaller fraction of patients say their symptoms worsened after vaccination, although generally doctors continue to advise that those with long COVID get vaccinated to protect against reinfection.
 

Aarbron

Member
So I did not want to post in this thread anymore, but this one I really wanted to share as it hits somewhat close. Last year, like many places in the world, COVID ran riot through many aged care homes here in Melbourne, Australia.

One of the worst affected aged care homes, was St Basil's Greek Orthodox Aged Care, with around 45 residents succumbing to the disease. We have a large Greek community here in Melbourne (being Greek myself, I know many impacted).

Thankfully, a coronial inquest has been launched into these deaths with much dirt now being brought to light. Terrible corporate management and a shambolic response by external, government agencies caused the needless death of the elderly. Vic CHO wrote letters ordering Administration to follow certain instructions - even though Aged Care homes fall under Federal jurisdiction. Federal Government - totally inept. State Government - overreach. Victims - close to 50 members of my community. Neglect. Borderline torturous conditions.

Coronavirus Victoria: Details revealed of St Basil’s Homes for the Aged deadly outbreak


From the above article, the following stood out:

the basic needs “of the many highly dependent residents were neglected to a point that a number presented at hospital dehydrated, malnourished, suffering from serious pressure sores and in very poor general health, in addition to being COVID-19 positive.”

Geez, they stood no chance.
 
Last edited:

sinnergy

Member
This thread is going in loops for some USA states … looks like early Covid … come on people get your act together ! Be smart , wear masks, wash your hands , keep distance , and pressure governors, to obey and mandate these simple rules .. it’s hardly necessary that some states in the US need refrigeration mortuaries..

And get vaccinated for at least the 2 shots !
 

FunkMiller

Member
WTF is wrong with Australia?

Terror.

Last year they did the right thing by locking down hard, but then sat on their arses and did nothing about preparing for the virus to get through, instead thinking zero Covid was a viable thing (Fucking idiots).

Now they’re shitting themselves empty every day because the vaccine rollout out has been too slow, delta is a bastard, and they’ve got no psychological resilience.
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
especially in light of what happened very soon afterwards in Israel with the Delta variant that we know infects the vaccinated at a vastly higher rate, nevermind any concerns of waning immunity over time.
One more thing. You've said this before, but this isn't accurate.


The per capita infection rates and severe illness rates for vaccinated (green) Israelis over 60 are in fact lower than the unvaccinated (blue).

RyPRrhT.png



The per capita infection rates and severe illness rates for vaccinated (green) Israelis under 60 are also lower than the unvaccinated (blue).

b0YY8Bl.png




Among active patients with COVID, most of them are vaccinated, but that's because most Israelis are vaccinated. Looking at the per capita rate, unvaccinated Israelis are much more highly represented.

LwrSiYb.png
 

RAÏSanÏa

Member

seems normal


It looks like someone threw a clean shirt on an untreated paranoid schizophrenic and set them loose.

It's like they've having a severe fear reaction to their imagination.
Acting out irrationally and attempting to force public health policy with anger and threats, not data and a calmly demonstrated existent problem.

They're living in fear of some boogeyman they brought with them that's accompanied with their uninformed, unsubstantiated and paranoid "what if" and want public leaders to make policy on to their rantings, not a data driven and informed policy calmly presented based on what is actually happening.
 
Last edited:

CherryFalls

Banned
How was everyone's side effects after the vaccine?

I tried to see if having more or less side effects mean anything, but apparently it doesn't mean anything in terms of effectiveness
 

sinnergy

Member
How was everyone's side effects after the vaccine?

I tried to see if having more or less side effects mean anything, but apparently it doesn't mean anything in terms of effectiveness
My second shot Pfizer was shite , I had flu like symptoms, headache , swollen glands for 2 days, my wife got it even worse .. but it’s better than COVID I guess ..
 

Aarbron

Member
Norway Permanently Removes AstraZeneca From Vaccine Program

Norway will remove the AstraZeneca Plc shots from its Covid-19 inoculation program due to the risk of rare blood clots, in a move the country said will have little effect on the national vaccination timeline.

“The government has decided that the AstraZeneca vaccine will not be used in Norway, not even voluntarily,” Prime Minister Erna Solberg said at a news conference on Wednesday.
The government last month ordered an expert committee to examine the consequences of not including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s so-called viral vector vaccines. That was after the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said Astra’s shot shouldn’t be used due to its connection to “rare and serious incidents of low platelets, blood clots and bleeding.” The institute earlier this week also recommended that the Johnson & Johnson jab should be excluded.
The country’s public health institute said last month its calculations suggested that the risk in Norway of dying from Covid-19 across age groups was smaller than the risk of dying from the “serious but rare” side effects that followed the Astra shot, “particularly among young people.”
 
Last edited:

Kilau

Member
How was everyone's side effects after the vaccine?

I tried to see if having more or less side effects mean anything, but apparently it doesn't mean anything in terms of effectiveness
About 8 hours after my second Moderna I felt like utter crap, achy in my limbs and felt like I had a fever but I never did. Lasted about 24 hours. My wife also felt bad after her second dose but not as bad as I did but she also never lets on how bad she is really feeling. My doctor told me that they were seeing younger people have harsher side effects from the second dose but it wasn't universal, at least in my extended group of those vaccinated that seemed to hold true.
 

Jaysen

Banned


Buncha dummies. Alabama also has the lowest vaccination rate. Theyre much smarter dan dem dere siuntists.
 
Last edited:

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
How was everyone's side effects after the vaccine?

I tried to see if having more or less side effects mean anything, but apparently it doesn't mean anything in terms of effectiveness
Sore shoulder on both for a day. 2nd shot I felt some fatigue for about 1.5 days and stayed home and played games all day.

bec.gif
 

Chaplain

Member
Video: This is when you can get COVID Booster Shot (8/18/21)
Basically, the CDC is leaving it up to patients and their doctors to decide who needs an extra dose and when they should get it. And apparently, there won’t be a requirement for a doctor’s note or prescription. And so if that’s the case, basically anyone can say they are immunocompromised in order to get a booster shot….unless those administering the vaccine require proof of a qualifying immunocompromised condition. So that’s a messy situation that the CDC should further clarify. Otherwise, pretty much anyone can lie and get a 3rd shot.
















 

thefool

Member
Where's the Novavax at?

I ask that question every day.

Food for thought. Remdesivir was approved for EUA in May 01 2020 after a single clinical trial showed signs of helping covid recovery (31%). Ivermectin? Has 63 studies showing average of 68% improvement. Guess which one makes money, and which one was approved? https://ivmmeta.com/

Because Gilead filled the pockets of people with power since the beginning of the pandemic. And while WHO has recommended against its use since November 2020, this didn't stop Biden to send remdesivir to India in April 2021, touting it as help.

EDIT: Same reason why AZ vaccine been fudded to oblivion vs the others. Been waiting to see if this manuscript ends up being published in Lancet
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
How was everyone's side effects after the vaccine?

I tried to see if having more or less side effects mean anything, but apparently it doesn't mean anything in terms of effectiveness
No side effects for me unless you count arm soreness, but I have that after my Flu shot every year. I expected some though. I even took off the day after both shots in case I was sick, but ended up just sat on my ass playing Warframe all day.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Makes zero sense? The observed group is 1,497 people. Of those 1,497 people, 7 of them came down with long COVID. i.e. Half a percent of the observed group came down with long COVID. That's a perfectly reasonable interpretation of the data since that's what it literally says.

I implore you to stop with the novel-sized replies and get to the point.

It is not reasonable when he is comparing it to the general population statistic that looks only at long COVID cases as a percentage of total COVID cases, not the entire population. He's using a different method of calculation for the study group to get a much more appealingly low percentage.

One more thing. You've said this before, but this isn't accurate.

Sorry for the confusion on this one. I meant "affects the unvaccinated at a higher rate than previous variants," not that the vaccinated were being affected at a higher rate than the unvaccinated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Damn, the Texas gov already had three vaccine shots and yet got the advanced authorization approved $50k or whatever Regneron treatment cost it is even though he didn't have any symptoms, all on the public dime, while preaching anti-science shit that was getting his voters killed. He's like Iago on steroids.
 
Last edited:

Jaysen

Banned
Damn, the Texas gov already had three vaccine shots and yet got the advanced authorization approved $50k or whatever a treatment cost it is even though he didn't have any symptoms, all on the public dime, while preaching anti-science shit that was getting his voters killed. He's like Iago on steroids.
Are you surprised that the biggest pieces of shit are actually the biggest pieces of shit? They will play to the idiots in their base to get votes, but behind the scenes they do exactly what the experts are saying to do.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
I’m not too happy with the guidance on a booster shot. They want us to take a booster of the same vax, and not specifically tailored to delta.
If it helps then it helps and that's all I am interested in personally. If all it does is decrease my chances by 5% I'll consider that worth it.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Even if you guys were right that they have no tests on the booster to see if it helps (which is obviously ridiculous because of course they tested it to some extent) the worst it can do is nothing and the best it can do is help you. Even if it's just a little bit I consider that preferable to just doing nothing and hoping for the best like some of you seem to be a fan of.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Even if you guys were right that they have no tests on the booster to see if it helps (which is obviously ridiculous because of course they tested it to some extent) the worst it can do is nothing and the best it can do is help you. Even if it's just a little bit I consider that preferable to just doing nothing and hoping for the best like some of you seem to be a fan of.

No, actually. The original trials were ostensibly done to determine how many shots would be best not only for immunity effect but for safety. For the mRNA shots, they landed on two spaced out by a few weeks because that stimulated a significant immune response. The second shot stimulates a much stronger response than the first. Who knows what a third or fourth shot spaced out by months would do, especially in younger people? They're injecting the elderly by the tens of thousands in Israel right now, so we'll get some official data on old people at least fairly soon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-...ine-passport-cdc-mucosal-immunity-11629128219

The answer is that there’s more than one kind of immunity. Internal immunity protects the inside of the body, including the lungs. This occurs by release of antibodies of the Immunoglobulin G type, or IgG, into the blood and production of T-cells. Vaccines injected into our muscles are highly effective at stimulating internal immunity. This largely protects vaccinated people from being overwhelmed by the coronavirus, unless they have an immunodeficiency or are exposed to an unusually large amount of the virus. Vaccination will dramatically reduce your likelihood of serious illness or death if you’re exposed to SARS-CoV-2.

In contrast, mucosal immunity provides the first line of defense by protecting the nose and mouth, and by doing so also reduces spread to others. The mucous membranes secrete a particular form of antibodies of the Immunoglobulin A type, or IgA. But vaccines injected into our muscles—including all the approved inoculations against Covid—are largely ineffective at stimulating the secretion of IgA into our noses that occurs after actual infection with a virus. As a result, vaccinated people can contract a Covid-19 infection confined to the mucous membranes. They may get the sniffles but can spread the virus to others even if they are asymptomatic. That’s why it makes sense for them to wear a mask under some circumstances
....

Vaccines administered via nasal spray exist for other ailments, including polio. They’re under development for Covid-19 to supplement existing shots with mucosal immunity. In the meantime, herd immunity may prove difficult to achieve unless more people get infected and develop natural immunity of both types. Given the dangers of infection, officials are rightly reluctant to encourage actual infection, and loath to mention its benefit in conferring mucosal immunity.

But we shouldn’t shun people who have recovered from Covid. Vaccine mandates for in-person interactions—whether imposed by governments, employers or businesses—should make exceptions for the previously infected, who thanks to natural mucosal immunity are likely at less risk than never-infected vaccinated people of spreading the virus to others.


https://www.theblaze.com/news/neuro...eviously-infected-less-likely-to-spread-covid

If vaccines are going to be mandated, make exceptions for those who have recovered from COVID-19, since their "natural mucosal immunity" puts them "at less risk than never-infected vaccinated people of spreading the virus to others."
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
No, actually. The original trials were ostensibly done to determine how many shots would be best not only for immunity effect but for safety. For the mRNA shots, they landed on two spaced out by a few weeks because that stimulated a significant immune response. The second shot stimulates a much stronger response than the first. Who knows what a third or fourth shot spaced out by months would do, especially in younger people? They're injecting the elderly by the tens of thousands in Israel right now, so we'll get some official data on old people at least fairly soon.
Yes yes the scary vaccine may kill us all. Those damn horrible fascist capitalist anti-human rights doctors/scientists and their damn help. Always trying to do what's best for us all.

They can't keep getting away with it 🙄
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Yes yes the scary vaccine may kill us all. Those damn horrible fascist capitalist anti-human rights doctors/scientists and their damn help. Always trying to do what's best for us all.

They can't keep getting away with it 🙄

*sigh*

That's not even my position, but they've certainly killed and maimed some relatively small number of people. According to you, though, the worst they can do is "nothing."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top Bottom