www.reuters.com
That was a whole lot of nothing indeed.Spain's Rovi says possible Moderna vaccine contamination under investigation
Spanish pharma company Rovi said on Thursday the potential contamination of some doses of the coronavirus vaccine which it manufactures for Moderna was under investigation and appeared limited to some batches for Japan.
For your quest.
If you don’t need government for anything, why is a government needed? Let’s have a private healthcare, police, firefighters. Let’s have homeless addicts, etc. dying on the streets since they are a burden to society.
Government provide free vaccine, easy access toi mask. What more do you want?
Then how come we have to sign agreement if things go wrong, we cannot sue the vaccine maker. Let be real, there are no where enough test, but there are not much choices. Let it be clear, i am a conservative, i don't trust the vaccine we have, but I also get the vaxx back in March/April because the alternative, which is catching covid 19, is much worse.
What level of evidence would you require to be convinced the vaccine is safe and effective? Because it’s cleared every bar one could reasonably expect it to clear.
There's all sorts of questions about quality control and prevention.
You don't need to convince me, I got my shot; I just don;t trust it. Like i said, the alternative is worse. Vaccine typically take years and if not decade to get approve and pfizer is done within 1 year.
I mean i understant why they push for in school learning. It is better but can it be done safely?I’m all for virtual schooling. We did it last year, and schools should have offered it as an option for this year as well. Instead, people wanted to get back to “normal” and said the hell with it. Now, we are caught flat footed once again, which is putting more and more kids behind. Who didn’t see this coming?
Timestamped to show you that you don't know what you're talking about:
“Inescapable” COVID-19 Antibody Discovery – Neutralizes All Known SARS-CoV-2 Strains
An antibody therapy that appears to neutralize all known SARS-CoV-2 strains, and other coronaviruses, was developed with a little help from structural biologist Jay Nix. Lifesaving COVID-19 vaccines are allowing us to feel optimistic again, after more than a year of anxiety and tragedy. But vacciscitechdaily.com
Imagine if this proves to be true in humans following additional testing, and they're able to rapidly develop it into a treatment.
What if I told you I know quite a bit about regulatory approval processes?
Look, if it is as safe as you claim, why the paperwork that state you cannot sue the maker.
Because showing a causal relationship between vaccination and any kind of subsequent health issue outside of a controlled setting is nearly impossible and lawsuits attempting to demonstrate as much would serve no purpose. There were and are controlled studies with placebo groups and all other mechanisms typically required which have shown the vaccines to be safe.
I mean there was no doubt it work, until the delta. The issue is how and why it is approved so quickly. Can we be certain, 100%, no corner was cut to made it hit the market asap?
Here's a thought experiment. Read this excerpt, and then think to yourself if this person is right or wrong, why your hunch is what it is, what could be influencing you to think that way, and if you're operating with the whole picture in mind.
www.npr.org
Also, why we still got monkeys?
Not at all, gun is a "choice", people choose to buy gun. If vaccine become mandatory, there is no choice at all. That the big difference.Here's a thought experiment. Read this excerpt, and then think to yourself if this person is right or wrong, why your hunch is what it is, what could be influencing you to think that way, and if you're operating with the whole picture in mind.
FACT CHECK: Are Gun-Makers 'Totally Free Of Liability For Their Behavior'?
Hillary Clinton said Monday that the gun industry isn't legally responsible for its behavior. She's (partially) right.
Do you find any parallels to anything?
Take note of how quickly you tried to rationalize this with hypotheticals that don't exist.
I also got vaccinated early. I was kind of hoping to stick with Novavax for my next round but they're taking forever to get supply up to roll out so I might just get a Pfizer or something.
www.nature.com
I can't find it but somewhere way back in this thread there was an article about people beginning the very early stages of data collection on people who get multiple types of vaccine. I think the early impressions were that it appears that initial side effects were slightly more severe, but that it is possible it could provide a slightly higher immunity. The article may have been based out of Israel, but it was a while ago and I can't remember.
Why do you guys get so worked up and agressive? It surely does not help proving your point.
Yeah unsurprisingly given the market, Novavax is going to be marketed mostly as a booster in the US for that reason, it stacks on the others really well.
Theoretically, I can see how it might help. The mRNA vaccines show the altered spike protein antigen to your immune system, so your immune system produces antibodies to counteract the spike protein. The traditional vaccines show the other parts of the virus to your immune system too, so you generate antibodies that react to the virus "body" too. Developing a strong immune response to as many potential antigens as possible could serve some advantages.
Doctors are talking in the video. Nothing bad is going to happen if you let information enter your head, you know.
Likewise, it's also higher risk, though. Like for anyone who is worried about yet undiscovered antibody reactivity a narrower immune response poses fewer opportunities for such complications.
