sure, I think it ranges from 30-80% efficacy after 1 shotMy brother took the first Pfizer shot in April but it made him feel like total shit and he refuses to take another. I know that's rare but does he have any protection at this point with one shot?
After 4 months .. he better take the second shot.sure, I think it ranges from 30-80% efficacy after 1 shot
The US intelligence community could not agree that it was a lab leak. In fact, most believe it was of natural origin. Only one thought a leak was possible. Not saying it's not possible, but the results of investigations don't bear out the hypothesis. Further enquiry needed, but none of the things you list were conclusive. The 'facts' aren't good enough.
Hospitals are overrun and the economy has stalled. Children are starting to get COVID now right as schools are opening, fall is starting, and labor day just happened. The solution is going to be vaccine mandates, not giving away the only thing we have to return the country to some sense of basic safety. At what point of vaccine degradation would you think it's morally okay for US citizens to not fund vaccines that are given away, and instead pay for the ones they take themselves? 70% protection from hospitalization/death? 50%? 25%? They're going to decrease in effectiveness, which is the only reason a booster is being recommended.I mean, his job by definition is to worry about and speak for the poor countries getting vaccinated--and if we're being honest, it's safe to say he's right about nobody else giving a fuck--so I can certainly understand his frustrations
we've reached a point where we have an abundant amount of vaccines that we can't even get people to take, while they are begging for help and it doesn't even enter our peripheral awareness.
Do you not realize that there was no investigation because the Chinese government prevented it? The Western scientific establishment collaborated with the Chinese government to prevent it. Most of what we know is crowd sourced from public info like the FOIA request.
I’m assuming you meant tested positive again? Testing negative would mean they don’t have symptoms.Both kids tested negative again. Daddy daycare can fuck off I need to get to work for a much needed break
They both have been totally fine except I measured that both had very mild fevers a couple days ago which didn’t last more than a a couple hours (I think maybe the touch free thermometer isn’t the most accurate). Second negative test about a week after potential exposure. Also, the three year old had COVID last year and the baby potentially got antibodies in utero. So I’m guessing they’re fine to leave our little quarantine any time, we just need to confirm with the health department and daycares.I’m assuming you meant tested positive again? Testing negative would mean they don’t have symptoms.
Ah, man, sorry to hear about the sprig. I’m glad she’s alright now, mind, along with the rest of your family. That’s all that matters in the end.They both have been totally fine except I measured that both had very mild fevers a couple days ago which didn’t last more than a a couple hours (I think maybe the touch free thermometer isn’t the most accurate). Second negative test about a week after potential exposure. Also, the three year old had COVID last year and the baby potentially got antibodies in utero. So I’m guessing they’re fine to leave our little quarantine any time, we just need to confirm with the health department and daycares.
Jokes on him, most of those idiots can’t read.Saw this on Twitter this morning.
After 4 months .. he better take the second shot.
It would be nice if they at least acknowledge the criticism and talk about it. I'm certainly interested.Rogan has Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying on his latest episode.
Can't wait to see what people go overboard with on this one regarding his COVID takes.
He said in the beginning he wasn't vaccinated. He said months ago he wasn't, but he never made public if he'd have gotten the vaccine since. So he confirmed it.It would be nice if they at least acknowledge the criticism and talk about it. I'm certainly interested.
I'll have to check it out when I'm off work, but I appreciate the summaries.He said in the beginning he wasn't vaccinated. He said months ago he wasn't, but he never made public if he'd have gotten the vaccine since. So he confirmed it.
Only 2 minutes in and I've already heard something I know people are going to blow out of proportion. I'm paraphrasing, but he said "It's a shame people don't know there's things you can do out there to help you recover if you haven't been vaccinated" and then talks about vitamin D and losing weight again. I can pretty much guarantee within 48 hours that is going to be framed as "Joe Rogan says don't take the vaccine and follow his pseudo-science to recover from COVID."
Are either of them accepting any responsibility at all for "inadvertently" contributing to conversation downplaying the importance of the COVID vaccine?Bret's position appears to be more more "COVID is very serious and if there's any drug out there that can improve your chances of survival once you get COVID, then I don't want doctors afraid to prescribe these things and have people die, because dishonest people with agendas are trying to nip these conversations in the bud" than it is "Don't take the vaccine, take Ivermectin."
Bret has always been very pro vaccine, and has always taken COVID seriously.
I'm listening and so far there is very little engagement with the criticism, a lot of mutual back-pattingAre either of them accepting any responsibility at all for "inadvertently" contributing to conversation downplaying the importance of the COVID vaccine?
If it's all just excuses, I'm going to be disappointed in them both. Even if that was never Brett's position or Joe's position, both of their stances emphasizing exercise/ivermectin over vaccines have clearly been abused by disinformation campaigns and are playing a negative role in the pandemic.
I had to pause it, but so far they haven't really talked about how the drama with how their stances have been portrayed at all.Are either of them accepting any responsibility at all for "inadvertently" contributing to conversation downplaying the importance of the COVID vaccine?
If it's all just excuses, I'm going to be disappointed in them both. Even if that was never Brett's position or Joe's position, both of their stances emphasizing exercise/ivermectin over vaccines have clearly been abused by disinformation campaigns and are playing a negative role in the pandemic.
Editor’s note: Following audience concerns over the efficacy and accuracy of the scientific methods used in the ivermectin study performed in Nigeria in 2011, the original publishing station, KTSM, issued the following correction:Ivermectin infertility story correction: FDA rejects 2011 Nigeria study
A national story regarding Ivermectin and a study regarding its effect on men’s reproductive health that KTSM published, has been removed from our website.www.wfla.com
Small study across three universities, but 85%. Will be interesting if there is a larger followup.
650k dead, hospitals at breaking point throughout the country, despite us having an extremely effective and safe vaccine readily available.I'm listening and so far there is very little engagement with the criticism, a lot of mutual back-patting
Still don’t understand this logic.waiting for my second dose but not taking those boosters shots. i Still feel like shit 2 weeks later
I don't know about this, there was that podcast where he had Steve Kirsch on who was talking about babies with bloody fucked up brains being born because of vaccines, which seems to me to be abject fear mongering. Bret never even pushed back...Bret has always been very pro vaccine, and has always taken COVID seriously.
I find B+H to be pretty exasperating figures. They really fucked up promoting some dodgy anti-vax stuff but when I listen to them talk about stuff from their book I find myself agreeing with most of what they say, so it's hard for me to completely disown them650k dead, hospitals at breaking point throughout the country, despite us having an extremely effective and safe vaccine readily available.
vs
some irresponsible reporting on ‘horse dewormer’, and them being butthurt about getting made fun of.
It doesn’t take a genius to know what they will focus on.
So UK peeps... "Firebreaker lockdown" in October. What odds are we doing that it goes ahead?
I reckon it will not because we need it or Hospitals are been overwhelmed, just because the Goverenment wants to be seen doing something and they're evil pricks to boot.
Good, people like her can fuck off.This lady gets fired for intentionally and aggressively coughing on others at a supermarket, while not complying with the supermarket's masking policy.
The Woman Who Went Viral for Intentionally Coughing on Shoppers Is From Scottsdale
“The coughing lady is from Scottsdale. Of course she is."www.phoenixnewtimes.com
Joe actively avoids pushback. It exposes more than usual that he’s just an uneducated moron.Saw a few clips on my lunch break from Rogan today. It's just not a mystery any more what their stances are here.
Full blown, unambiguous advocacy for taking Ivermectin. Says straight up that you need to have doctors that aren't afraid to prescribe it. Calls all stories of ivermectin overdose toxicologically impossible and fake news.
Then goes into a lecture about how the vaccine causes variants.
I liked the commentary on Fauci though, and totally agree that he should be aggressively fired from his job from a cannon.
So at the end of the day, we're stuck trying to determine who is telling the truth on this. It's pretty much impossible at this point unless you want to start running your own experiments. You just have to make your own choice on who you want to trust I guess. What a disaster.
It's an awful idea to have this kind of controversial subject matter discussed with 3 people that already agree with each other, and zero push back on anything.
One thing that's galling is that David Fuller/Rebel Wisdom repeatedly tried to get Bret (or both) to come on and debate the ivermectin/vaxx stuff in a good faith discussion, but according to him they kept refusing. I'm like "goddamn you're supposed to be in the Intellectual Dark WEB which means you're supposed to HAVE the difficult discussion, not dodge it". I actually tweeted something like "without the Web aspect of the IDW all you're left with is the Intellectual Dark" at Bret in my frustration.Saw a few clips on my lunch break from Rogan today. It's just not a mystery any more what their stances are here.
Full blown, unambiguous advocacy for taking Ivermectin. Says straight up that you need to have doctors that aren't afraid to prescribe it. Calls all stories of ivermectin overdose toxicologically impossible and fake news.
Then goes into a lecture about how the vaccine causes variants.
I liked the commentary on Fauci though, and totally agree that he should be aggressively fired from his job from a cannon.
So at the end of the day, we're stuck trying to determine who is telling the truth on this. It's pretty much impossible at this point unless you want to start running your own experiments. You just have to make your own choice on who you want to trust I guess. What a disaster.
It's an awful idea to have this kind of controversial subject matter discussed with 3 people that already agree with each other, and zero push back on anything.
He only pushes back on people dumber than he is, like Dave Rubin. More intelligent grifters are safe.Joe actively avoids pushback. It exposes more than usual that he’s just an uneducated moron.