It's not even a vaccine. More like a flu shot. Small pox, measles, etc...now those are vaccines.
Do you think effective means 100% protection?
You are really showing that you just have no idea what you are talking about here.
All vaccines have breakthrough infections, measles is only roughly 97% effective, smallpox 95% effective at preventing symptomatic infection initially. Most vaccines require booster shots to maintain that effectiveness - measles and smallpox included. Whooping cough is only 80 - 90% effective and that's after an initial shot and 4 boosters and that's in young kids.
Having to take tests while fully vaccinated is some serious BS.
But obviously still a positive because of the outcome. It's sucks yeah, but rather a positive test now before a rampant spread later.
m.vk.com
Cringe Variant
If Beal could improve his game so he scored 60%+ of his field goals, would he decide not to because he could still miss? Or because his team could still lose games?
That's society for ya.
To be fair to them, professional athletes are far more likely to be hesitant when it comes to something like this. Any kind of unforseen side effect could be a career-ender. Many will look at the data for unvaccinated people and conclude that it's not worth taking the chance.
If you present it that way, it's quite wrong, too.
You know what's also a career ender? Severe illness from COVID19. Fortunately, a young fit person like him will probably not develop that. Even more fortunately, is that career ending severe illness is even less likely from the vaccine by an astronomical amount, as well as helping to insulate himself from being a vector of transmission that could endanger his friends of family members who aren't so young or fit as he is.
They insinuated that the vaccine doesn't protect you from catching COVID even though it does, as if the situation is a binary 100% effective or no difference. "It doesn't eliminate anyone from getting COVID". That's wrong. The vaccine has prevented huge amounts of people from catching COVID.
That is a reasonable statement. Don't forget all the other misinformation they presented.
Yes it is much more than that. Don't ignore the misinformation and false equivalences.
Your risk assessment is wrong. It DOES help much because it reduces your chance of getting severely sick in the first place.
Dude, do you have your own personal Bat-Signal for this thread or something? LOL.
It has horse paste armor.
Nope. You should do what I did and point out and then politely correct the misinformation.
The problem with pulling numbers out of your ass is that they will almost definitely be wrong.
That would be a real shame for them lol.
www.theguardian.com
And this is the reason why a Republicans do not have a master plan, they are as stupid as their Democratic counterparts. They willingly are letting their most ardent voters simply die.
Big age bracket there with 18-39.
Local data in to back up the unsupported speculation I made back in early August that children would be the most vulnerable to catching Delta.
Looking forward to finding out what studies show are the reasons and how it lines up with that speculation.
Big age bracket there with 18-39.
Backed up by this guick slice of what's currently happening in Saskatchewan with new cases.
BC school boards are taking their own initiatives to expand on provincial restrictions as needed.
Some good news as September closes out, the daily cases in the province are lower than 30% below the 1200/day predicted by modeling at the start of the month and covid ICU numbers continue to go down.
The comparison with Alberta is getting too lopsided to keep up regularly anymore.
The decision was in last week on which province had the policy failure in pandemic response.
A rep in the AB gov tried to pin the fault for the near overcapacity of the ICU on AHS CEO Verna Yiu, not the lack of covid policy from the government. That lady and Alberta health did amazing work expanding the system to handle what it has had to so far and kept the death rate as low as it is in those circumstances with those patients. Reporters were wondering why the AB health services CEO was appearing at news conferences earlier in the month when apparently no other provincial CEO has. Now it's looking like it may have been an attempt by the sitting government to shift blame as much as possible.
