I have a minor skin condition for which I semi-regularly take an oral medication which clears it up. I'll preface this by saying I don't think my family doctor is dumb and he's been my trusted doctor since I was born. I went in to see him a few years ago after some time off from taking the treatment, and he was like so what are you taking for this? I told him what I normally take (it should be on file but whatever), and he googled the medicine right in front of me and read one of the first pages summaries of the drug. Mentioned the risks that he was reading right off the site, and I'm like, yeah ok you've been giving me this for years. He's like are you sure you really want to take this though, here are the potential risks. I'm like, you're the fucking expert man how the fuck do I know, maybe we should do tests or something? You're the fucking doctor. Again, I've been taking this for years at your direction, so hook me the fuck up I guess?
Then like a year after that, I go in for more, and he's like oh wait there's a new one I want you to take instead that is potentially less harmful. I asked if it was more or less effective than the previous treatment, shrugged shoulders. Will the condition clear up permanently? Shrugged shoulders. They learn the accepted wisdom and repeat it, and I'd wager most of them don't really care to understand a lot of what goes on in the profession, when they can wear the white coat and point at peer reviewed studies and say well these guys say this works.
Another time many years ago I went to him because I was feeling pretty depressed and I was at the point where I wanted to know what my options were. I walked in and at the first word, he's like here you go take these pills. I was a little taken aback by this and decided not to take them (doing great now thanks for asking). I just feel like everyone is putting their trust in the guy above them without understanding anything. I can't stand drawn out internet arguments about this stuff anymore either because this is how everyone operates - it's googling battles and my trusted source can beat up your trusted source.
You're not far off the truth here.
I'll say this though: a doctor Googling stuff isn't necessarily a sign that they're ignorant. Drugs have become so many, so widespread, and so complex, that it's basically impossible for a good doctor to know very well more than a few dozen medications. So many contraindications, interactions and side effects for any drug. A quick check before writing a prescription is never a bad thing. A doctor knowing every detail about every drug belongs in pre-World War II novels, or in TV shows. Unfortunately TV shows about the medical world got us used to doctors having extremely obscure notions at the tip of their fingers, only to spend an entire episode checking the obvious online or on books. It doesn't work like that.
This is the age of Google. No way for a single doctor to know and remember everything, especially about drugs. Also patients will always Google drug effects, side effects and contraindications. Better be prepared to use the same tool to have a discussion with patients on even ground. The most important difference between a patient and a doctor is that the doctor should know how to put together all the pieces better than the Internet. A doctor should also know how to make a more accurate Google research on medical matters.
It's true, however, that a lot of professionals often act like push-button physicians and never think outside what they've been taught, and that once a doctor has made up his mind about a diagnosis, it can be hard to make hom look at any other evidence. I remember the introduction to the excellent book
How doctors think, which tells the story of a woman with celiac disease spending
years finding a diagnosis that you'd think most doctors would have suspected much earlier. I also remember one Italian woman who went to work in the UK, had some blood tests, and was told she had iron-deficiency anemia. She was actually the carrier of a beta-thalassemic trait, which is very common in Italy, and that can cause blood cell alterations similar to iron-deficiency anemia. No Italian doctor would be so easily misguided in such a case, but a UK doctor was easily tricked by his own bias.