Do it.... I know you won’t you chicken shit lol.
Seriously nows a great time. Both GPU makers just released their new architecture. There is always something on the horizon though.
They can, and some outlets do.Can they rereview this once the nect gen patch hits and the bugs ate gone?
That's how you make progress in society. Ban everything you disagree with.Guys guys guys, check out the review thread on Era. They're only allowing negative reviews and it's fucking hilarious. Maybe I'm getting too old ( I'm 27 jesus fucking Christ) but this is world is starting to scare me
Nah I think re-reviews are completely fair if a game has improved/changed dramatically since launch.They can, and some outlets do.
But personally, I think they deserve whatever score they get when they start asking for people's money. It's fair.
Fuck it, I did it, but with a slightly cheaper option. Found pre-built PC with a 3080 come in stock for $2199 and nabbed it. First prebuilt PC I've bought since like the mid-90s. Hope it doesn't blow up in my face!
Amazon.com: Skytech Siege 3.0 Gaming PC Desktop - Intel Core-i9 10900 2.8GHz, RTX 3080 10GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVME, Z490 Motherboard, 750W PSU, Black: Computers & Accessories
Amazon.com: Skytech Siege 3.0 Gaming PC Desktop - Intel Core-i9 10900 2.8GHz, RTX 3080 10GB, 16GB DDR4, 1TB NVME, Z490 Motherboard, 750W PSU, Black: Computers & Accessorieswww.amazon.com
Not an unlocked CPU, but I should be good for 1440p.
I agree.They can, and some outlets do.
But personally, I think they deserve whatever score they get when they start asking for people's money. It's fair.
The madlad actually did it.... holy fuck haha.
After seeing the rtx screens I am jealous that I got a 5700xt. The non rtx screens look great but that 3080 is going to do wonders for you.
Sure, I don't get upset if places do a 2nd review or something. I'm just saying that I personally wouldn't feel the need to.I agree.
But its also fair to change the score when the game keep on getting more value with time
So give a score on launch date, and if the game got better with time, update the review
Dont see how that wouldnt be fair
But in this case, the game is huge, so I dont see many outlets doing a re-review in the future
Sadly AMD seems to be a few years behind in both DLSS and RTX. Nvidia is the right choice for now imo.I kind of wanted to wait and see what the 6900 XT would bring, as I really do like AMD for some reason, but oh well! Evil empire Intel + Nvidia it is.
All I can say is play for yourself. Not everyone is going to have the same issues others have. Again going back to TW3, it's combat is trashed on by people all the time, but it's the characters, story, sidequests, and world that made people fall in love with it. Perhaps the positives just really outweigh the negatives here.
Lol. I just got perma-banned from r/games for saying that the Polygon writer "spent more time talking about bullshit like men with vaginas and voice issues than talking about the game".
If anyone is worried about the state of the world, don't be. These impotent people wouldn't have to constantly be abusing their limited internet powers to stamp out "wrong-think" if they held any sway in the real world.
How fragile must these people be?
They are closing fast and their price is too good to beat.... I might be biased since I have some stock.Sadly AMD seems to be a few years behind in both DLSS and RTX. Nvidia is the right choice for now imo.
Have you played control with RTX? It's pretty amazing.They are closing fast and their price is too good to beat.... I might be biased since I have some stock.
My 5700xt has been amazing and this is the first time I think I’ll miss out on RTX.
I dont see how giving a low score on the first review due to the game being broken/bugs would "reward companies" and be anti-consumersSure, I don't get upset if places do a 2nd review or something. I'm just saying that I personally wouldn't feel the need to.
On some level, I feel like it doesn't help consumers and just helps reward companies that release buggy, broken games and ask full price for it.
It's basically just up to each outlet. But you're right that game journalists barely seem to have time to review long games now - let alone review them twice.
I dont see how giving a low score on the first review due to the game being broken/bugs would "reward companies" and be anti-consumers
Like giving it a 5, and then giving it an 8 or whatever after patches.
But in this case is different because there are outlets giving 10-9's to the game, despite being buggy. So, yeah.
Maybe the bugs havent distracted them from the experience so much, I dont know
Holy shit the gamespot review, now inside that reviewer's brain :
Reminder, an RPG
You can't make this shit up. My fucking girlfriend who can barely play Mario Kart even with assists because she sucks so much at videogames would have gotten more content out of this game than this Gamespot reviewer.
- Barely ever crafted
- Almost never changed gear
- Did not do sidequests because one of them had cops and she does not like cops(?)
- Ignored quests because she had more important things to do
- Not interested in combat (ok, but might i reminder, you're a fucking reviewer? This ain't your couch session)
- Used mantis blades once
- Did not bother with gun attachments.
- Did not understand what was in inventory, because she did not have time
- Guns did not feel like Call of Dooty (duh) early on, because oh i don't know, again, RPG? (Deus Ex for fuck's sake?)
- A depressing game by design (dystopia?), stuck in 80's style (cyberpunk?), she's disapointed (what did she expects?)
What a piece of trash review.
Jules from WhatCultureGaming
5/5
says out of principle he doesn’t give perfect scores, but had to.
Says it runs well and is optimized great giving it’s scope. Mentions a few bugs and says they don’t affect day to day gameplay.
Hmmm, it's very likely going to slip under the Gold Standard of 90... so much hype looks like it wasn't justified in the end.
Dantics did a full 100% playthrough and explored everywhere and did all the quests he could, and he did about 120 hours. So I feel many of the people who are saying you can complete everything in 50-60 hours simply missed a lot of stuff from a lack of exploration.
Holy shit the gamespot review, now inside that reviewer's brain :
Reminder, an RPG
You can't make this shit up. My fucking girlfriend who can barely play Mario Kart even with assists because she sucks so much at videogames would have gotten more content out of this game than this Gamespot reviewer.
- Barely ever crafted
- Almost never changed gear
- Did not do sidequests because one of them had cops and she does not like cops(?)
- Ignored quests because she had more important things to do
- Not interested in combat (ok, but might i reminder, you're a fucking reviewer? This ain't your couch session)
- Used mantis blades once
- Did not bother with gun attachments.
- Did not understand what was in inventory, because she did not have time
- Guns did not feel like Call of Dooty (duh) early on, because oh i don't know, again, RPG? (Deus Ex for fuck's sake?)
- A depressing game by design (dystopia?), stuck in 80's style (cyberpunk?), she's disapointed (what did she expects?)
What a piece of trash review.
I want to become a food critic by just moving my fork through the plate, then give a bad review of the restaurant because i was not in the mood to try it.
IGNIGN Japan 10/10 https://jp.ign.com/cyberpunk-2077/48777/review/20202077
Japan reviewers resonate well with me
Holy shit the gamespot review, now inside that reviewer's brain :
Reminder, an RPG
You can't make this shit up. My fucking girlfriend who can barely play Mario Kart even with assists because she sucks so much at videogames would have gotten more content out of this game than this Gamespot reviewer.
- Barely ever crafted
- Almost never changed gear
- Did not do sidequests because one of them had cops and she does not like cops(?)
- Ignored quests because she had more important things to do
- Not interested in combat (ok, but might i reminder, you're a fucking reviewer? This ain't your couch session)
- Used mantis blades once
- Did not bother with gun attachments.
- Did not understand what was in inventory, because she did not have time
- Guns did not feel like Call of Dooty (duh) early on, because oh i don't know, again, RPG? (Deus Ex for fuck's sake?)
- A depressing game by design (dystopia?), stuck in 80's style (cyberpunk?), she's disapointed (what did she expects?)
What a piece of trash review.
I want to become a food critic by just moving my fork through the plate, then give a bad review of the restaurant because i was not in the mood to try it.
Holy shit the gamespot review, now inside that reviewer's brain :
Reminder, an RPG
You can't make this shit up. My fucking girlfriend who can barely play Mario Kart even with assists because she sucks so much at videogames would have gotten more content out of this game than this Gamespot reviewer.
- Barely ever crafted
- Almost never changed gear
- Did not do sidequests because one of them had cops and she does not like cops(?)
- Ignored quests because she had more important things to do
- Not interested in combat (ok, but might i reminder, you're a fucking reviewer? This ain't your couch session)
- Used mantis blades once
- Did not bother with gun attachments.
- Did not understand what was in inventory, because she did not have time
- Guns did not feel like Call of Dooty (duh) early on, because oh i don't know, again, RPG? (Deus Ex for fuck's sake?)
- A depressing game by design (dystopia?), stuck in 80's style (cyberpunk?), she's disapointed (what did she expects?)
What a piece of trash review.
I want to become a food critic by just moving my fork through the plate, then give a bad review of the restaurant because i was not in the mood to try it.
Yup.
what the fuck are you talking about?Lol why did they let a girl review this ?? this game is made for guys
what the fuck are you talking about?
No one has the final day one patch, they have half the patch. Will have to see how much improvement takes place with full patch implementedI'm blown the fuck away that a game this buggy is sitting at 90. Seems like it could be far better with polish. Wait a few months and play it fresh and it would likely be a mid 90s reviewed game.
Women earned the right to vote and play Cyberpunk a while ago.this game is made for guys not women
Women earned the right to vote and play Cyberpunk a while ago.
In some places they even are allowed to drive now.
The ESRB has given Cyberpunk 2077 the Mature rating, for depictions of:
- Blood and Gore
- Intense Violence
- Nudity
- Strong Language
- Strong Sexual Content
- Use of Drugs and Alcohol
Sure, but there are definitely women who play games that will be into it as well. Lots of men reviewed Animal Crossing too.Sure. But this game is not going to appeal to most female gamers its going to appeal to mostly bros people with more testosterone.