Hugare
Member
That's also exactly my problem with Jeff Grub's reviewI wanted to give Kallie a fair shake and really see where she's coming from, but it sounds like she went into the game with certain expectations, and when they weren't met she made up her mind about the game and didn't give it a fair shake for the rest of her playthrough. A playthrough she rushed, where she barely did any content outside of the main story. It really sounds like to me that she wasn't the best choice to review this game.
He complained about the game not being revolutionary (really)
He expected things like: being able to sit on every bench (yeah, he also complained about this), being able to enter every building, being able to play in some slot machines, complained about offering "limited" options for stealth and combat ....
And man, this pisses me off. Because we have RDR 2 sitting at a 97 MC score.
A game where you can't sit on every bench and interact with every object.
Where you can't enter every building. Where you can't interact with NPCs more than "hi" or "rob".
Where mission design is ATROCIOUS, all you do is shoot shoot bang bang, and you can't even deviate from the linear path otherwise its "game over".
Where was he in 2018 to tear a new asshole in RDR 2 with those criticisms?
Witcher 3 didnt revolutionize gaming in 2015. It was just a damn good game in almost all fronts. And being good at that level is something so rare, that despite not revolutionizing the gaming world, it was still my GOTG.
And I expect the same with Cyberpunk.
Last edited: