cyberpunk switch 2 direct feeds leak

Kataploom said:
"Switch 2 has better textures, global illumination and higher level of detail than Xbox Series S and PS4 Pro in Cyberpunk 2077. It also offers better general performance than PS4 Pro version."
Click to expand...
LordOcidax said:
Mark my words, the Switch 2 is going to receive a port of Cyberpunk 2077 and in the dock mode is going to run and looks better than the PS4 Pro version…
Click to expand...
jm89 said:
Bro thinks this is some flex. Congrats I guess, cause anything less is gonna be a big oof.
Click to expand...

u2t3e9V.jpeg


I miss Tom Sawyer, Sweetooth and Gamer79 Gamer79

ZfHk1Pq.jpeg
 
Last edited:
To be honest with the number of replies on hardware power and peoples challenging me for over a year constantly, to say I feel vindicated would be be an understatement

Bryan Cranston Mic Drop GIF
 
Physiognomonics said:
Never beating graphically intensive PS4 games, even docked, with that memory bandwidth. It's going to on par with PS4 graphics with downscaled PS5 games (which developers also do on PS4 like latest Jedi Survivor BTW).
Click to expand...
Elfstar said:
Can't wait to see the "it's between a Pro and a Series S" crowd to backtrack and state how much power doesn't matter when Nintendo will underclock the console so much it will barely reach Steam Deck camp.
Click to expand...
Klosshufvud said:
Delusional Nintendo fanboys who think Switch 2 will come even close to PS5 or even Series S at a mere 7W TDP? Delusional fanboys who think DLSS is a magic solution despite being known to offload computing from GPU to CPU?

Yup, business as usual.
Click to expand...
Klosshufvud said:
Upscaling from 540p to 1080p is bad business no matter what upscaling or reconstruction technique used. There simply isn't enough pixels to work with to make a decent image. This is why upscaling techniques really only becomes viable when base resolution is minimum of 1080p. And there will absolutely be a TDP limit even when docked. Why? Because the cooling is still the same. Docking does not magically add huge fans to cool down a 300W power output. Just look at Switch 1. You'll see even in docked, its TDP is highly modest compared to other consoles. Because it's still restricted by its handheld cooling.

If you're expecting more than from a Steam Deck, you're delusional. DLSS under these restricted settings (weak CPUs, low amount of compute units, low base resolution) is not at all comparable to a beefy PC using DLSS with a high-end CPU to support it. Such comparisons are meaningless.
Click to expand...
FalconPunch said:
This is where the Nintendo delusionist begin to show their true colors. Nvidia GPUs besting amd gpus in the desktop space has absolutely nothing to do with performance in the low power space. Keep in mind that at each price level where they compete, Amd is better in rasterization than Nvidia.

We don't even know what process node Nvidia is using for this chip but if it's Samsung 8nm, it's not going to be touching the Z1 extreme in the Rog Ally talk-less of the Series S. Some seriously low iq takes in this thread. Also, DLSS has a fixed cost to it and unfortunately, mobile hardware will not have as many tensor cores as desktop. We're talking about a tdp limited chip and people here are dropping clown level takes. Absolutely ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Muddy said:
Yes it's not.

It's actually more expensive cause Nvidia.

So you expect an Nvidia powered handheld on par with the Series S to cost 400 dollars?

When AMD powered handhelds cost 1000 dollars with the similar specs.

Yeah right.
Click to expand...
The Infectious Paradox said:
Switch 1.5
Click to expand...

😂😂
HNHrxZZ.jpeg


More quotes incoming, don't worry there's plenty of crows left in the kitchen.
 
Last edited:
LordOcidax said:
😂😂
HNHrxZZ.jpeg


More quotes incoming, don't worry there's plenty of crows left in the kitchen.
Click to expand...
These people don't reason based on specs or technical comparisons or anything grounded, they just cry "iT's BeCaUsE nInTeNdO 🤪" and keep it going over and over again without listening.

The specs were public, even some tried using the chinese guy badly made simulation, pixel counting a heavily compressed youtube trailer of an old build, relying blindly on DF, etc. Just to keep the narrative even tho the specs were public for years already.

Even the "less powerful than Steam Deck on portable mode" claims were always false, Steam Deck GPU isn't even 1.6 TFLOPS in real world scenarios because that would imply the GPU always running at 1600 MHz which never happens, it's around 1 TFLOPS normally because it tends to run at around 1 GHz and the same for the CPU, claiming it's superior to the one on Switch 2 because someone made a graph showing synthetical benchmarks comparing it at full speed (3500 MHz) when in reality it's between 1.7 MHz and 2.1 MHz in AAA games because, you know, games have to render graphics and the Deck have to dynamically allocate resource with a max 15w TDP.

The writing was in the wall, and even we the optimistic ones have had to update our expectations frequently because it was showing to be better each time.
 
I'm almost hesitant to wait a few months in case they release a 60fps patch.
As it is, the game is already a huge flex for cdpr and the switch 2.
 
Looks like shit. Also beginning to think gigabowser and lordocidax are getting paid to shill for this version of the game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

37 Minute Direct Feed Cyberpunk 2077 footage from Switch 2
12 13 14 15 16
768
3K
GigaBowser replied
Hitman direct feed Switch 2 footage
Analysis Hardware Hype 
31
700
xrnzaaas replied
DF Direct Weekly #209: Cyberpunk 2077 Switch 2 Hands On...etc
News  2
68
3K
mckmas8808 replied
Cyberpunk 2077 Switch 2 NEW footage from Japan
2
64
1K
geary replied
CDPR Switch 2 Cyberpunk Luanch Trailer
Business Trailer Hype 
15
222
GigaBowser replied
Top Bottom