Lactose_Intolerant
Member
It wasn't a speech. He was answering questions.
Welp, time to stop answering questions.
It wasn't a speech. He was answering questions.
I agree. Add in having to deal with second amendment too
I'd also say teachers face this to a lesser degree
THIS. SHIT. RIGHT. HERE. Fuck this guy so fucking hard.
This OP doesn't do a good job of covering everything he said.
From NPR:
Hopefully that adds some context
THIS. SHIT. RIGHT. HERE. Fuck this guy so fucking hard.
Welp, time to stop answering questions.
That definitely is an interesting viewpoint.
From the OP, it doesn't look like he's blaming black women. Just saying that cops shouldn't be responsible to fix that problem. Which I'm not sure even makes sense.
Not looking forward to seeing the ideologues flood this thread and lambast him for adding nuance to the conversation.
we're simply asking police officers to stop killing people then constantly justify it but okay
I'm just going to point out that the DPD Chief is an African-American.
Whoops!
I know he's black. black people aren't removed from anti-blacknessBrown is black.
Coincidentally, older black men do end up doing the same thing.
You guys should watch the full presser QA rather than reading a summary. He made good points and his tone was reserved. He wasn't saying anything really bad.
There's nothing to get mad about.
I know he's black. black people aren't removed from anti-blackness
umm, isn't he more blaming black men (like himself) for not being a father figure to their children?
I don't think anyone is expecting cops to fix schools or most of the things he mentioned. People are protesting the unarmed killing of blacks.
Sure what he's talking about is larger societal problem, but I don't see what that has to do with the protests.
All we're asking is police be held more accountable in unjustified killings. Everything else he's saying it just noise in regards to that.
Thanks for this post. He's trying to make some interesting points, but kinda fumbled the delivery, unfortunately.
Good points made, but his solution contradicts his complaints. If you think the cops are overwhelmed by societal problems, why is your solution to hire more cops, instead of fixing the problems themselves ?
Was he saying "Man, we gotta figure out a way to stop killing unarmed people and doing everything we can to ensure the officer stays on the force/doesn't go to jail?" cause I don't hear anything about that in his speech.
It can be taken that way. I took it as single black mothers are consistently raising burdens to society.umm, isn't he more blaming black men (like himself) for not being a father figure to their children?
Was he saying "Man, we gotta figure out a way to stop killing unarmed people and doing everything we can to ensure the officer stays on the force/doesn't go to jail?" cause I don't hear anything about that in his speech.
I really wish more people understood this.
"He's saying the same thing I'm thinking therefore I am not out of touch nor racist!"
This was a press conference, not a speech.
He mentioned that being part of the community works by policing within the communities and trust with citizens is what will keep police safe. The part that OP mentioned was just a small portion of a rather lengthy QA.
How do cops "solve" single african-american mothers? Marrying them? Being their wing-man?
I don't understand. It makes no sense.
This is in response to the murder of his officers not to the BLM protests.
Those are two seperate issues.
In 2009, the department received 147 excessive force complaints and made 74,000 arrests. Within three years, arrests were down to 61,000, and within five years excessive force complaints were down to 53.
...
And in the years since 2012, when police shot 23 people, the number of police shootings has decreased each year, down to 11 in 2015. According to the data, Dallas police officers have shot one person this year.
After a series of officer-involved shootings in late 2013, Brown overhauled the department’s lethal-force policies, including a requirement that officers undergo training every two months instead of every two years. The new policies won him a lot of public criticism from police groups and police advocates. He was even criticized by the Dallas Morning News, which accused him of being “reactive” and “moving too quickly.”
...
Brown has fired more than 70 Dallas cops since taking office. But he doesn’t just fire bad cops, he also announces the firings — and the reasons for them — on social media. It’s a bold sort of transparency for which, again, he’s been criticized by police groups. Shortly after taking office, Brown fired a police officer who had kicked and maced a handcuffed suspect. But he not only fired the cop, he publicly praised the officer who turned that cop in, an implicit acknowledgment and criticism of the notorious Blue Wall. “One of the things that I really want to express about Officer Upshaw’s action is that we should not as a department ostracize him in any way. We should applaud him coming forward, him intervening,” Brown said.
...
Since the Ferguson protests in 2014, there has been a lot of reporting about the devastating effects on the poor that come from the aggressive enforcement of traffic infractions and other petty crimes. Brown was ahead of the curve here, too. Between fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2013, the number of traffic tickets issued in Dallas dropped from 495,000 to under 212,000. That’s a massive cut. Brown reassigned traffic patrols to beats he felt were more conducive to public safety
Then why did he tell protesters to stop protesting and become a cop?
umm, isn't he more blaming black men (like himself) for not being a father figure to their children?
Oh. In THAT case, he can sit on bladed dicks..
I know he's black. black people aren't removed from anti-blackness
Yes, but if his response to protesters is "come join the police to fix this problem I just told you we can't fix" instead of "go protest the legislature since they have more control over the root causes of these issues", that doesn't make too much sense. Not to mention the fact that BLM protests are specifically about police interactions with their communities.The Police Chief has zero input into the legislative process.
Oh boy. I think his intentions here were good but....some of those sentences...
I don't think anyone is expecting cops to fix schools or most of the things he mentioned. People are protesting the unarmed killing of blacks.
He's essentially saying "Be the change you want to see."
Wasn't this debunked as a myth?We've had this discussion on GAF about the high percentage of black single-parent homes before, and statistics show that it is absolutely a legitimate issue that should be discussed. Not sure if the policeman chose the right venue, though.
Was he saying "Man, we gotta figure out a way to stop killing unarmed people and doing everything we can to ensure the officer stays on the force/doesn't go to jail?" cause I don't hear anything about that in his speech.
Then why did he tell protesters to stop protesting and become a cop?
I'm not making his point for him. No one expects cops to solve that problem. No one calls them to ask about that problem. People do not call the cops to babysit or ask for relationship advice.You're making his point for him. He's saying cops are dealing with the larger difficulties in the black community, but are largely powerless to treat the root causes of those problems, even though they take all the blame for the results.
This.That definitely is an interesting viewpoint.
From the OP, it doesn't look like he's blaming black women. Just saying that cops shouldn't be responsible to fix that problem. Which I'm not sure even makes sense.
Bullshit. He had plenty of other shit to rant about.
Either way that point is irrelevant to the issue everyone is protestingThe quote was taken out of context either way, so the point is moot regardless.
Adding more good apples doesn't do anything in the long run when the barrel is completely rotten...
Yes, but if his response to protesters is "come join the police to fix this problem I just told you we can't fix" instead of "go protest the legislature since they have more control over the root causes of these issues", that doesn't make too much sense. Not to mention the fact that BLM protests are specifically about police interactions with their communities.
Did he blame black women? Did he say it is always their fault that they are raising children as single parents? He stated a statistical reality, not a statement of condemnation about its cause.
He seems to be saying that protests do nothing positive for communities and his lone solution is for black men to become cops to take care of their community. As if there's nothing remotely wrong with America's policing system currently.
I'm not making his point for him. No one expects cops to solve that problem. No one calls them to ask about that problem. People do not call the cops to babysit or ask for relationship advice.
This is in response to the murder of his officers not to the BLM protests.
Those are two seperate issues.
His ire is directed at legislators, teachers, bad parents. He is not talking about BLM directly. He is addressing society.Exactly. I don't know wtf he's talking about.
I'm gonna hope you're joking..you're usually "funnier" than this..
The Police Chief has zero input into the legislative process.