Muffin1611
Banned
Also what does that have to do with FEP being Neutral?
I mean as in the discussion got pretty heated at some point, and I don't think the neutral would let it come to that and rather bail and switch what he's looking at.
Also what does that have to do with FEP being Neutral?
ha! sorry. I'm in class and multitasking and it's easy for me to forget to finish a sentence or something, and I've got some other things on my mind. It's been a day. But here it's also influenced by the fact that I'm thinking through it.You typed all of this and yet somehow still didn't end up answering my question as to whether you think FEP is more likely to be Scum or Neutral.
i'm impressed tbh
Then what do you think pushed a Scum!FEP, who was universally Town Read, to act this way and cast himself in such a negative light? He could've just continued on as normal and likely would have never been caught.
I mean as in the discussion got pretty heated at some point, and I don't think the neutral would let it come to that and rather bail and switch what he's looking at.
ha! sorry. I'm in class and multitasking and it's easy for me to forget to finish a sentence or something, and I've got some other things on my mind. It's been a day. But here it's also influenced by the fact that I'm thinking through it.
Mafia FEP could easily be trying to get someone being scumread lynched as the other half of the reveal with kits.
Neutral FEP would be going against so much of the this-game lore we've constructed around the neutral.
Scum FEP could be trying to find the neutral to avoid for NK. Neutral FEP could be trying to build cred so that if he draws the NK, he argue it away. Neutral FEP could be trying to guide NKs by spreading so many seeds. But by saying oreo, isaac, and you could all be neutral candidates, and by going so hard after me... how is that productive?
This is what I keep coming back to: why the fuck does any FEP do this at all? I keep going back to the if-thens (like this post) - would neutral FEP be trying to figure whom to best burrow/ignite to maximize his chances at wincon?
I don't have a straight answer on this one. Let me ask you a question: do you think FEP is town?
It may be that in general today I'm hesitant to say "x is true" because we are getting close and I haven't been super accurate here.
Well, I'm just speculating, but either kits was scum and FEP was getting a bit desperate and feared we might go for him after he was kits biggest defender yesterday, or if kits wasn't scum, town yesterday voiced concerns or got more critical of his real scum partner yesterday and FEP thought now may be the time to go for the green check and godfather angle, and let the discussion around monkey dominate this day. That's all I could think of right now.
Well, I'm just speculating, but either kits was scum and FEP was getting a bit desperate and feared we might go for him after he was kits biggest defender yesterday, or if kits wasn't scum, town yesterday voiced concerns or got more critical of his real scum partner yesterday and FEP thought now may be the time to go for the green check and godfather angle, and let the discussion around monkey dominate this day. That's all I could think of right now.
For todays vote I'm either for oreo as neutral suspect or FEP as scum. I know I said earlier that neutral would be my priority, but sleeping over it, I'm not completely sure of it anymore.
We kill neutral -> We eat a NK from scum
We kill scum -> We either eat a NK and an ignite; eat only an ignite if NK hits neutral; or nothing at all if NK hits neutral and neutral decides to burrow
The first option is playing it safe, the other one is taking a risk, but with possible great outcome.
What do you guys think? Take the risk, or play it safe?
I don't disagree. This is what I keep coming back to - NONE of this makes any sense. So many of the things he's said can be easily disproven or rejected outright. So without any kind of explanation or motivation it's hard to figure, and with no flips, it won't get any easier to figure.I'll go back to what I asked Muffin: how does it make sense for a Scum!FEP to do what he is doing? He was universally Town-Read up until the point he flopped away from Kits and even then, wouldn't it have been far safer for him to just keep going as normally instead of going all-out and pulling strawman arguments out of thin air?
The only reason I'm hesitant to believe tunneling townie is that this did start the day of the Stan lynch and he wasn't tunneling. He just kept shading. This level of sudden determination just seems weird from any angle. I too was reading FEP as town. But now I just don't know.To answer your question I have 2 ideas as to what's happening: FEP is Town and tunneling really hard or he's Neutral. I don't think a Scum!FEP would do what he's doing even if Kits was Scum. There is no way to 100% verify Kits flip so the idea that he's trying to obscure it and is going this far to do so seems kinda insane. I won't ignore the theory that it's possible but if FEP really was going to go that hard on someone - why Monkey of all people? It would have been way easier to go after someone else. Now prior to all of this FEP is pretty universally Town Read and I honestly think he was playing really Townie, so I can see here that he found something 'scummy' and just dug himself into a hole and refuses to leave it, digging up any scrap of info he finds to push his point because he believes he's right.
That's a good explanation for the doctor yelling, actually. The rest, honestly, I don't think is as tinfoil hat as any of the other possible explanations; it's weird no matter how you slice it. But I actually quite like that doctor explanation.Now, a Neutral FEP requires some tinfoil hat theory so buckle up kids. Neutral FEP gets by on a fairly Townie game but hasn't hit Scum, he's also 1 of 3 of the Top posters in the game and might even be considered a 'Town Leader'. Maybe he realizes if he burrows one of the other two Top Posters ( myself or Monkey ) and pushes for the other to be lynched and succeeds, suddenly he's the Top Poster and has control over the conversation. This would explained why he claimed 'WIFOM Doctor' at the end of the last Day Phase - didn't give time for the real Doctor to counterclaim and, if by the start of the next Day he wasn't counterclaimed and there wasn't a NK, could claim he was a Doctor and protected himself. When, in reality, he's the Neutral and couldn't be NKed anyway.
also, willing to vote for him as Scum but still 'just speculating' on reasons he could be scum? 🤔
I don't disagree. This is what I keep coming back to - NONE of this makes any sense. So many of the things he's said can be easily disproven or rejected outright. So without any kind of explanation or motivation it's hard to figure, and with no flips, it won't get any easier to figure.
The only reason I'm hesitant to believe tunneling townie is that this did start the day of the Stan lynch and he wasn't tunneling. He just kept shading. This level of sudden determination just seems weird from any angle. I too was reading FEP as town. But now I just don't know.
That's a good explanation for the doctor yelling, actually. The rest, honestly, I don't think is as tinfoil hat as any of the other possible explanations; it's weird no matter how you slice it. But I actually quite like that doctor explanation.
Here's the problem I have with everything: every possible alignment, it's easier for FEP not to do this. Which is why I'm just like ¯\_(ツ_/¯
I'm not married to the vote. I'm essentially voting on lynch all liars/shade while voting elsewhere as scumtell/something is causing this. But I'm open to other developments. Problem is this has overshadowed every damn thing. Even though there are other conversations happening, we're going to circle back to this because it's weird.
nin, oreo, isaac - would love your thoughts.
I'm not speculating why FEP is scum, I'm speculating why scum FEP would change tactics like that, as I was asked to.
I'm pretty sure I told you all already that imo weak justifications for my vote as well as kits defense yesterday and incoherent arguments today are the main reason why FEP comes over scummy to me.
I feel like FEP's actions today have to be looked at in concert with your other reasons you listed. You said if Kits is Scum then a Scum!FEP would've gone hard against Monkey to obscure the Kits lynch, you also speculate that if Kits WASN'T Scum then he's doing it to protect someone else. I'm asking which you feel is more likely because if he IS Scum, what's the justification for what he's done today?
I don't disagree with your reasons for scum reading him ( sudden Kits flip and arguments that make no sense ) but I don't get the reason for them, especially the latter. That's what I'm asking.
also I apologize if I don't make sense. For some reason I had to read your reply a few times before I sort of got what you were saying. >.>
Scum hunting is results based. Someone batting 0 when scum had been exposed is impressive.This is going to come off really asshole-like but
have you actually read most of the game, FEP? Like, honestly. Monkey is one of the few people I've seen actually scum hunting and the fact that you repeatedly keep calling her out for not doing that is absolutely ridiculous and is not helping your case. It feels like you're purposefully cherry-picking examples of her from this Day Phase and not previous ones that fit your narrative
Not true. That is just the best case scenario, which is only possible with the neutral alive. One of the very first things i ran was a worst case scenario for hitting mafia.This is my fault for not taking the time to sit down and go over everything in-depth but are you forgetting the fact that most of your scenarios involve the Neutral hitting Scum in order for us to come out on top?
Because you are gambling A LOT on the chance that not only is Monkey Scum but that the Neutral hits Mafia for us as well when they have a WAY higher chance of scoring Town. Stop saying 'lynching Mafia is our best shot here', more aptly you should say 'lynch Mafia and hope the Neutral is a damn good shot and hates Scum or else we're still fucked'. Does the NK introduce the element of a wasted NK? Yes, and that helps us as the game dwindles but also is dependent on Scum hitting them which they still haven't done. But you're forgetting the key fact that the Neutral is WAY more likely to hit Town due to how many more players we have than them hitting Scum, something you seem to just be eagerly handwaving away.
But let's pretend we get mafia today.
D5: 7p 4t 2m 1n
D6: 4p 2t 1m 1n
Still pretty grim actually. This is a bad case in which maf hits town and neutral ignites town. However, if town can hit the next maf
Your read list from other phases is irrelevant today. Today, your scum lists have been made of everyone not on your kits lynch.You're being reductive here, talking around the discussion rather than engaging. Of course rac's not on my scum list. I'm saying that's someone I had town read. I might have called nin out, but that doesn't mean I'm voting him today. But what of the rest?
Two posts at the end of d3. Renewed at the end of d4You started building that up the day of the Stan lynch. You said I had a red flag, was dead weight, was anti-town. Then you dropped it in favor of kits, then Muffin.
That was a typo. I'm almost always on mobile but notice the grammar. "I was putting you on any town lists" meant to say "I wasn't putting you on any town lists".This is a lie. You called me scum at least twice that I can remember off the top of my head last day phase and said I was 99% scum while Muffin was 70%ish. That's not a town list.
My now who is flip flopping? What am I, monkey? Maf or neutral?
Answer my question. You're sending me these mega posts but you aren't engaging the core argument, just with little details.Uncertainty over your zigzagging behavior is not flip-flopping.
You've yet to point out a single lie. The best you have is that I started shading you d3 and then focused on other shit d4... When I said muffin was 60% scum and you were 99%... that was this day phase, while my vote was on you.You've made your own. You are lying, blatantly, boldly. You have been pointing fingers at one person while voting another, even though you said one (me) was more likely scum than the other (Muffin).
Uhhh...You mean like if I was mafia, I wouldn't defend Stan? Which you keep saying I did.
Stan wasn't town tho... why would maf defend town?If kits was town maf wouldn't defend her.
If kits was maf there is one maf member remaining. That member may be burrowed. They need to kill the neutral today or else maf may lose the game.
Not sure i understand the question. If she were to flip town, i would have been wrong. But i think the logic is simple here whether she is scum or not.Fep, if I get your argument right, are you saying that by keeping monkey alive, and that guaranteeing scum gets their NK, you are absolutely sure that monkey is scum?
If monkey was lynched, and flipped town, that's you on the line for that
This is flatly untrue and repeating it doesn't make it true. Sawneeks did vote for kits; she's not on my list, though she did switch off. oreo was on the lynch, and is on my list. isaac didn't vote for anyone at all, which is most suspicious of all.Your read list from other phases is irrelevant today. Today, your scum lists have been made of everyone not on your kits lynch.
D3: "red flag" for me, "everyone who has even hinted about not lynching Stan is in the crosshairs," "we just don't need these people," "this is the most blatantly anti-town thing to happen in the entire game. There is no argument."Two posts at the end of d3. Renewed at the end of d4
I've engaged it. You just don't like my answer. Saw didn't either. But I'm not trying to give palatable answers; I'm trying to be transparent in my thinking. I don't know if you're scum. You could be tunneling like crazy. You could be mafia trying to cover to to get rid of someone. You could well be neutral. I don't know because I can't figure your motivation for leaping down a rabbit hole but it's killing all other discussion.Answer my question. You're sending me these mega posts but you aren't engaging the core argument, just with little details.
Am I scum or maf? Why?
Which could be one reason to see you as scum here. If scum wasn't kits, but you are, you could be trying to keep discussion off isaac, oreo, even nin. Anyone else. And it's very much up in the air right now as to what will happen with the vote. I'm almost always going to answer with long posts. It's easy to keep me engaged and focused on a thing. So if you want to talk about Muffin's theory, it's not that you're dumb - it's that I'm easy to bait.I've included the "if kits and i were maf" scenario, maybe more relevant for you. You'll notice I've never said mafia wouldn't defend their team. With lynches and ignites to worry about, I think maf wants to keep their team alive.
Looking at the numbers again, here's my biggest mistake. I've been operating with the idea of, even if I'm wrong and we ML monkey, it's better than MLing someone else. And this isn't wrong. But the difference is slight. This is why I unvoted at the end of the second numbers post.
So we need other candidates. We have less than 24 hours. It would be better for us to hit mafia but anything is better than town.
omg brb hanging myself since you keep literally asking me to hammer at youMonkey, if you want to keep hammering me
oreo, you flag Muffin as scum (I assume for tunneling/defending as you state above), but then vote for the person who he says is flying most under the radar. Does that impact your read of Muffin at all?
I guess the "kits wasn't scum and protecting somebody else" scenario is more likely, because a sole scum acting on his own this way is almost throwing the game. The risk of going against monkey is a bit high for the other one.
The only reason that I'm seeing is that FEP didn't think pushing a monkey lynch was THIS hard, because he may have thought that the combination of monkey going for CM and being still alive as a green check would be enough to convince us of monkey being the godfather, not expecting that we'd see the CM thing as something monkey would do and not giving that much weight to the godfather role. As monkey resurfaced, FEP laid the seeds for going against her a while ago already, and maybe thought one additional night for the green check to survive would be needed to convince us.
The problem I have is that I personally wouldn't do any of this if I were any alignment. So I can't help but see FEP as scummy even if I don't fully grasp the reason.
Scum hunting is results based. Someone batting 0 when scum had been exposed is impressive.
Not true. That is just the best case scenario, which is only possible with the neutral alive. One of the very first things i ran was a worst case scenario for hitting mafia.
This is the worst case scenario if we lynch mafia. And town monkey being alive makes it most possible because mafia definitely doesn't miss their nk. But even in this worst case scenario, town can still win the game if we then lynch mafia and then the neutral.
So, three successful lynches in a row. Same as if we kill the neutral today, we enter lylo for the last two. The difference is that this is the worst case scenario for hitting maf today and the best case for hitting the neutral.
Looking at the numbers again, here's my biggest mistake. I've been operating with the idea of, even if I'm wrong and we ML monkey, it's better than MLing someone else. And this isn't wrong. But the difference is slight. This is why I unvoted at the end of the second numbers post.
Essentially, while we can survive an ML, we need to be very lucky to have a chance whether it is monkey or not.
Do I think Monkey is the godfather? Yes. If no one else does and she won't be voted, I have to relent though. Better to wifom it today than tomorrow but whatever.
I hope I can convince people my play, regardless of whether you like it or not, doesn't make sense as scum.
So we need other candidates. We have less than 24 hours. It would be better for us to hit mafia but anything is better than town.
Can anyone else make any cases either way? Why someone is scum or why someone is town?
Not sure i understand the question. If she were to flip town, i would have been wrong. But i think the logic is simple here whether she is scum or not.
What is in mafias best interests?
1. Not being lynched.
2. Lynching the neutral
3. Not missing their nks
Mafia is not bussing while that neutral is alive unless the writing is on the wall. And without flips, even then it's not necessary. A crazy gambit to lynch mafia monkey is not in mafias interests at all.
If monkey is definitely not the neutral, her lynch is not in mafias best interests. Drawing the lynch to myself as mafia violates mafia interests for both 1 and 2 and doesn't serve any mafia interests.
Monkey dying in the day increases mafia chances of missing a nk. We can wifom on why they let her live yesterday, but this is just a fact. Town monkey alive at night is in mafia best interest.
Whatever she flips, it would make no sense for me to push so hard for monkey lynch as mafia.
After this, I think I'm done. I'd vote isaac today because I do think there's potential there. Cases could be made for nin or oreo, but I'm less inclined; I've been iffy on oreo all game but he's the lowest of my potential not-town reads today. But I'm gonna say honestly, please just go ahead and kill me or FEP if no one's going to talk about anything else. If we can eat another mislynch, I will fucking fall on that sword. I am just tired at this point and we're not getting anywhere else. If FEP or I am scum - since it ain't both - even figuring that out doesn't win us the game but what else is happening?
D3: "red flag" for me, "everyone who has even hinted about not lynching Stan is in the crosshairs," "we just don't need these people," "this is the most blatantly anti-town thing to happen in the entire game. There is no argument."
early D4: starts with feeling good about Muffin, "not impressed" with me, "Monkey is godfather with the green check," "But really, all this staring at the votes really points out monkey. On every lynch except for stan. That's just bizarro world to me. Maybe green checks make you bold."
These d4 quotes are all while you're still saying kits is scum, before you switched to Muffin. I don't feel like continuing to reread. That last one is #1255.
Not as convincing but I have brought it up. Of course it makes sense for neutral to try and lynch their scum targets. But not at the risk of dying themselves. Of course the same applies to town and I've done moderately poorly in that regard.On mobile and should be able to proper response in a few hours but FEP, you keeping saying 'my play doesn't make sense as scum' and I agree. But you've never answered against the argument of you being neutral.
Not sure i understand the question. If she were to flip town, i would have been wrong. But i think the logic is simple here whether she is scum or not.
What is in mafias best interests?
1. Not being lynched.
2. Lynching the neutral
3. Not missing their nks
Mafia is not bussing while that neutral is alive unless the writing is on the wall. And without flips, even then it's not necessary. A crazy gambit to lynch mafia monkey is not in mafias interests at all.
If monkey is definitely not the neutral, her lynch is not in mafias best interests. Drawing the lynch to myself as mafia violates mafia interests for both 1 and 2 and doesn't serve any mafia interests.
Monkey dying in the day increases mafia chances of missing a nk. We can wifom on why they let her live yesterday, but this is just a fact. Town monkey alive at night is in mafia best interest.
Whatever she flips, it would make no sense for me to push so hard for monkey lynch as mafia.
No, you're right that it would be a weird scum ploy to push like this, but I don't find your argument convincing.
If monkey was town, then scum would be pleased to keep her alive, since we are all thinking she's our best shot at catching the Godfather right now. Meanwhile, scum has a slightly smaller pool to now try to get the neutral.
How does monkey dying in the day increase the chances of scum missing the NK? I'm not following that. If you already laid it out in a post, you can quote it and I'll go over it again
I count it against results when we're talking about someone who wasn't on even the easiest scum lynch imaginable.FEP this is absolute bullshit and you know it. 'Scum hunting is based on results'? Really? When the 1 confirmed Anti-Town we have is due to a Town PR claiming and not from our own deduction you count that against 'results'?? So why aren't you also going after Muffin then?
Super godfather? Lol. Yes, what you wrote sounds like crazy bs. But that's not my position. How you cut through wifom is by making a decision. You've decided she's town and I've decided she's the godfather.So take Monkey out because she's either this super Godfather who has us all caught despite scumming hunting and putting in more work than most other players OR because we do Scum's dirty work for them so they have a higher chance at hitting a Neutral?
that doesn't sound like crazy BS to you?
Yes, it is better to deal with it now. But either way the mislynch is basically fatal. Very small chances of a town win.Monkey mentions this too but I'm slowly starting to agree, better to deal with this now instead of tomorrow in potential LyLo.
I hope I'm not the only one who finds this terribly ironic considering you keep pushing for Monkey, the Green Checked player, to be lynched on the off-chance she's Scum. Not to mention you keep INSISTING that if she's Town she will be killed anyway for a safe Scum Kill so it's just safe to kill her anyway. Come on, FEP.
The fuck? This is some straight up scum bullshit, saw. In what fucking world is that an interpretation? Christ.'if monkey is definitely not the neutral'? What, do you think Trigger lied?
No shit. That's your key for not throwing the game tonight. But I guess feelings are fine too.also again the whole, 'doing this as mafia makes no sense!' push. You've mentioned it twice with the stuff I've quoted ALONE, probably more if I went and looked around the past few pages.
Just repetitive but we're already fresh out of luck. If you want to risk a mislynch you ought to to it sensibly and even that likely ends in disaster. Numbers are on this page.Quoted FEP above saying something similar and having thought on it some I'm inclined to agree. We can risk a potential mislynch today but after that we're going to be running close to empty on any luck we have and fucking up becomes a greater risk. If both parties here are Town, or some variation of Town/Neutral/Scum, it's doubtful any of them die tonight since it either throws shade on whoever lives or gets a set-up for a mislynch on a potential LyLo. I'd rather prefer to sleep on it before committing but I'm tempted to say we just resolve this now then let it run into tomorrow.
No they aren't. Since when do you have to be convinced to throw shade? Monkey's been shading her fucking self since d4. Guess it's pretty scummy she hasn't self voted yet.I also want to say these are some really good call-outs that Monkey pulled here. If FEP was that convinced on Monkey to shade her for that long, and that early on D4, there is zero reason for him to not switch earlier than saying he would have had Day End not been so near. Smells like BS to me.
How does monkey dying in the day increase the chances of scum missing the NK? I'm not following that. If you already laid it out in a post, you can quote it and I'll go over it again
Basically. Even if we lynch the neutral, mafia won't know until tomorrow. Town monkey is 100% nk. If they choose not to kill her, they increases their odds of a miss because she is not in the pool of eligible players.I think the idea that FEP is forwarding is:
Lynch me today, either catch scum or cull a town - leaving 1-2 scum alive out of six. One of those options for the NK is the neutral. Raw probably is that if we mislynch a town, they have a higher chance of hitting the neutral. But if I'm alive, FEP swears this is they night they will NK me for sure since they will know I'm not the neutral.
I'm not justifying a town lynch. I specifically said today that a mislynch on you is still fucking dangerous, albeit slightly less dangerous than one on anyone else.Which seems like a lot of ifs and speculations predicated largely on us lynching a townie today, and it's probably my biggest scum-gut feeling on FEP right now. If we were on you for focusing on numbers, FEP using numbers to justify lynching a townie at endgame should be a screaming red flag.
Unless I'm the godfather. Which, sorry, am not. But it's an argument that will linger, I expect. There's just nothing I can do about it.
Kits is included in that.If I survive the night, everyone who has even hinted about not lynching Stan is in the crosshairs. This is going back to D1 "we just don't need these people" mentality.
CM was anti-town as fuck but no-one has countered the hypnotist claim. Stanley, being the target of it, claimed scum. As in, the one thing this power would force scum to do and no one else. No matter how much you don't trust CM, this is the most blatantly anti-town thing to happen in the entire game. There is no argument.
And your gotcha post about being so certain about you for saying you raised a red flag and then voting kits instead...
Had two typo gotchas today already.In this narrative it was town to defend Stan and scummy to shade you for doing it. In this universe it is scummy to It is scummy to actually defend people who are scum.
Just got up at 5pm again after laying sick in bed for hours reading stuff. Glorious.
Sorry for making you sick, monkey
I'm gonna catch up soon, one stupid thought I had just know: Did anybody entertain the possibility that kits was the neutral?
Just got up at 5pm again after laying sick in bed for hours reading stuff. Glorious.
Sorry for making you sick, monkey
I'm gonna catch up soon, one stupid thought I had just know: Did anybody entertain the possibility that kits was the neutral?
Just got up at 5pm again after laying sick in bed for hours reading stuff. Glorious.
Sorry for making you sick, monkey
I'm gonna catch up soon, one stupid thought I had just know: Did anybody entertain the possibility that kits was the neutral?