Not entirely in line with the British politics of immigration other than how much of a crisis it is at the moment, but this seems like relavent news to be posted as it shows the prime minister's definitely behind getting more Syrian immigrants in and as easily as possible.
From his Facebook page:
Other articles related include:
BBC: David Cameron: UK to accept 'thousands' more Syrian refugees
I would also like to plug in a friend's opinion as he's a contributor to Huffpost and is definitely far more knowledgable about this than me, and the article seems well written to a layperson such as myself concerning this immigration crisis.
Huffington Post's Calum Miller: Stop Making the Migrant Crisis About Us
What do you guys think?
From his Facebook page:
Given the scale of the Syrian crisis, and the suffering of the people, I can announce we will provide resettlement for thousands more Syrian refugees.
We will take Syrians from the refugee camps. This provides them with a direct and safe route to the UK, rather than risking the hazardous journey which has cost so many lives.
We will discuss how best to design these schemes and the numbers we will take with NGOs and partners. We will set out further details next week.
We have given £900m of aid to help Syrian refugees - the second biggest bilateral donor. And we are funding shelter, food, water and vital medical supplies for millions of desperate Syrian refugees.
Other articles related include:
BBC: David Cameron: UK to accept 'thousands' more Syrian refugees
Britain, he said, would act with "head and heart" to help those most in need.
He also announced a further £100m in humanitarian aid for those in camps in Syria, Turkey, Jordan and the Lebanon.
Earlier this week, Mr Cameron said accepting more people was not the simple answer to the situation, described by some as the worst humanitarian crisis since World War Two.
But speaking in Lisbon after talks with his Portuguese counterpart, Mr Cameron said the UK had a "moral responsibility" to help those displaced by the four-year conflict in Syria and more details would follow next week following discussions with organisations working in the region.
Meanwhile, a large group of migrants stuck at Budapest railway station for days have set off on foot, saying they intend to walk to Austria, as the Hungarian authorities try to contain thousands trying to reach western Europe.
'Deeply moved'
Calls for the UK to take in more refugees have intensified after the publication of a picture of the body of a drowned three-year-old Syrian boy, Alan Kurdi, washed up a Turkish beach.
Speaking to the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire programme, the boy's aunt, Tima Kurdi, said his and his brother's death should be "a wake-up call for the whole world".
The government's approach to the crisis has continued to come under pressure from public and political figures, including:
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has written to Mr Cameron calling for the UK to accept more refugees and said Scotland would take in 1,000 "as a starting point"
Ex Lib Dem leader Lord Ashdown said the PM's response had been "shameful"
Bristol's mayor urged residents of the city to use their spare rooms to help
Former Conservative Defence Secretary Liam Fox called for a safe zone in Syria to help those in fear of persecution
A petition calling on the UK to accept more refugees has got more than three times the 100,000 signatures needed for it to be eligible for a possible debate in Parliament
I would also like to plug in a friend's opinion as he's a contributor to Huffpost and is definitely far more knowledgable about this than me, and the article seems well written to a layperson such as myself concerning this immigration crisis.
Huffington Post's Calum Miller: Stop Making the Migrant Crisis About Us
This is not about us. It is not entirely clear whether we would suffer from increasing our refugee intake. But suppose we did. How could we possibly lose anything close to what these families would gain from being here? And how is it that our being lucky enough to be born into affluence could possibly justify not sacrificing some of that for those born into warzones? How can we talk so much about our own economic growth and yet ignore the families torn apart around the world, who come humbly to us, knocking on our door for help? Economics is important. And practical politics is important. But it is all worthless if it is not put to the service of those who need our help most desperately.
I am a conservative, as are many of my friends. But most of us are conservative because we think that conservative policies help to deliver better outcomes for the most vulnerable in society. That is, for example, why we still think that economic growth is important. If we did not genuinely think conservatism helped the most vulnerable people in society, many of us would cease to be conservatives. So conservatism is no excuse for callousness or for selfishness towards those not lucky enough to have been born thousands of times richer than others in the world, as the average Brit is. There are parties we could have voted for if we wanted that.
So it is with sadness that I call on the party I once half-endorsed to cease their ruthlessness. To stop using reasonable economic questions as a way of turning attention from the challenging ones that call for our sacrifice. David Cameron tells us that 'the most important thing is to try and bring peace and stability to [Syria].' This may be true, but it is a diversion. Peace and stability in the Middle East is not going to happen any time soon, and there are thousands of people homeless, starving and dying right now.
What do you guys think?