thecouncil
Banned
why woudl WB consider Hobbit a "failed experiment" when the third movie is doing gangbusters?
Because it taps into the internet's delusions.
why woudl WB consider Hobbit a "failed experiment" when the third movie is doing gangbusters?
I dunno, he says "final" fight, who says Doomsday is not the final fight but the middle one?
lol, exactlyBecause it taps into the internet's delusions.
I'll bump the thread if its fake or not once BvS comes out and Bruce talks to his dead dad
I guess I could see them doing a multiverse.
This sounds like a complete fucking mess. A 3.5 hour film? Are they fucking serious?
After the first edit. Movies usually go through like 3 to as many as 10+ edits watching for time and content.
Not that uncommonThat's a shitload of cut content just to get it to the 2.5 hour mark.
Not that uncommon
they believe that script is “TOO GOOD”
Avengers had a runtime of 143 and 30 minutes of deleted scenes. We're talking over half an hour on top of that. Movie is long.
You have to remember, there is more than even that.Avengers had a runtime of 143 and 30 minutes of deleted scenes. We're talking over half an hour on top of that. Movie is long.
Hahahahahahaha. Good one.
Avengers had a runtime of 143 and 30 minutes of deleted scenes. We're talking over half an hour on top of that. Movie is long.
Do you know how editing even works? Not everything they shoot are released as "deleted scenes". Assembly and reconstruction is a huge part of editing and it is iterative.
I'm fully aware. A film is largely made in the editing room. The film was always going to be at the 2.5 hour mark. However the question is whether it's closer to the 3 mark. The whole post gives the worry that the plot is way too complex.
This sounds like a complete fucking mess. A 3.5 hour film? Are they fucking serious?
Well it's going to be all Terrio so it's possible?
Correction they are "bleep" serious.
My head hurts after ready all that.
Snyder can carry a movie visually, all he needs is a good script.
he's in luck then. This one is apparently too good
You really loved Argo, I take it.
(I liked the movie myself, just think it's odd that so many people see Terrio writing BvS as some kind of slam dunk for the script)
Well it's also likely all a steaming pile of bullshit. Lol. Snyder being over indulgent and making a long movie, I can totally believe. But nothing in this set of rumors seem very credible. Having a DC "Cinematic Multiverse" sounds stupid as hell too.
and what's interesting about Stewart? he's the least interesting of them all. only time Stewart was a decent character was in the 1970s and when he was crippled. you got four Human Lanterns to choose from. Jordan is the flagship and is going to remain that way.
"We have enough material for two movies" "Make it three!"
"We have enough material for three movies" "Make it two!"
I know this whole post smells of bullshit, but that to me stuck out as the sort of thinking you would actually find at a big studio
I would happily watch a 4 hour Justice League movie. I'm not even kidding.
Remember that when people talk about the John Stewart Green Lantern, they are more often then not talking about the one from the cartoons, where he was an interesting and likable character. Plus, you know, he's a black superhero that a decent number of people are familiar with, and if that part of this rumor is true, then he lost his chance at a lead role.
Honestly, the only part of this rumor I want to be true is the one of a director's cut of MoS.