Always-honest
Banned
A lot of people say the AI is good, some people say its bad. Seems inconsistent at worst and really competent at best.
The AI is quite good.
Ah okay, thanx.
A lot of people say the AI is good, some people say its bad. Seems inconsistent at worst and really competent at best.
The AI is quite good.
Not 64 though?
GAF logic
Defiance was a better game .
you, my friend, you sound bitter. why?
That is the fun thing for me.
I absolutely loathed the Halo games with the exception of CE but absolutely love Destiny.
There is something in this game that just clicks for me. I can not quite get my hands on what it is.
So with 6 or 7 you failed your exam? Because that is his whole point.
Suddenly a 6-7-8 has become the new "this game is terrible" hype and the only true games worth buying are the one's who start at 85 until 100.
That is where gaming is going towards for a lot of people.
I'm not, I'm just explaining you the reasonning behind. But as a gamer, I'm really thinking of what this game brings that I never seen elsewhere.
Think about it, what if you were told "Wow ! This game is the biggest game ever made ! It's so impressive !".
Publishers don't throw numbers for fun. It's to build hype, to send a message. As a gamer, you're going to react to that message. When you'll be playing, you'll sure have a good time, but you also expect that promised to be fulfilled.
Also, taking this sentence alone just ruin the context. I also said a lot of things before that.
Ultimately, why should I waste my time playing a 6/10 or 7/10 game when there's so many 8/10 or 9/10 games out there that I haven't played yet? That you probably haven't played yet either?
I truly hate this meme. If you were choosing a doctor based on his grades in school you'd rate the exact same way. The american grading system is the exact same way and nobody bats an eye. Yet somehow this becomes hell on earth when it applies to game reviews.
Cause 6/10 or 7/10 games can be tons of fun and therefore are not ''a waste of my time''?
2014 has been the year of fun. Titanfall was fun, Destiny is fun. Everything is super fun time.
The stuff you said about studying for 8 hours a day to just get a 6/10 or 7/10 isn't relevant imo. Hopefully you know that there's loads of people who would be happy with that grade? Even after hours and hours of studying?
I don't really care what publishers say, it's marketing, I try not to fall for that.
Maybe I didn't read enough previews of the game but for me it's fulfilling promises. I got what I expected, a fun loot-based co-op shooter in a sci-fi setting.
Cause 6/10 or 7/10 games can be tons of fun and therefore are not ''a waste of my time''?
I am not that impressed so far. Hasnt hooked me like borderlands did. I went back to playing diablo last night on my xbox one.
Which just show how using school grade was a bad idea for your comparison.
It's marketing but it's also highlights of the product you're buying.
Also, for your last part, I'm not taking any judgement on Destiny. I never said this applies to Destiny, all I'm doing is explaining to you why some people would consider a 8 disappointing, because then again, they're throwing so much money at it that they could make a huge game that would set a milestone.
Also, I don't remember saying 6 or 7 games are bad. I never used "waste of time" either. You're just making assumptions here my good sir.
I may repeat it again, but my point was to say that because of the huge budgets, people expect huge games, hence why a 8 can be "disappointing" for some people. I'm not saying it is the case or that I do think so. I'm explaining the reasoning behind this.
...Hold on, where has this comparing review scores to academic grading thing come from? This isn't the first thread I've seen it in.
They're two entirely different scales for measuring two entirely different things.
I wonder if the game being cross-gen impacted the design in any way and hold back some of the idea's and potential for this game. Maps could certainly be bigger with more memory available, but it seems like cross-gen did no favors to the quality of the gameplay.
...Hold on, where has this comparing review scores to academic grading thing come from? This isn't the first thread I've seen it in.
They're two entirely different scales for measuring two entirely different things.
Mediocrity?
Nah, I'm just kidding, it's great that you're enjoying it.
Ultimately, why should I waste my time playing a 6/10 or 7/10 game when there's so many 8/10 or 9/10 games out there that I haven't played yet? That you probably haven't played yet either?
Ok, the review concludes with "...and has a strong and varied endgame"
What is that endgame? Can someone please explain, I'm serious, I'm a little lost here :/
Does he mean the 4 strike missions and the 1 upcoming Raid with "strong and varied endgame" or am I missing something?
A lot of people say the AI is good, some people say its bad. Seems inconsistent at worst and really competent at best.
If I was developing a game I would spend as little time working on AI as possible, because the truth is people don't even know what they are seeing when it comes to AI, and no matter what I do some people will call it the worst AI ever.
Ultimately, why should I waste my time playing a 6/10 or 7/10 game when there's so many 8/10 or 9/10 games out there that I haven't played yet? That you probably haven't played yet either?
If I was developing a game I would spend as little time working on AI as possible, because the truth is people don't even know what they are seeing when it comes to AI, and no matter what I do some people will call it the worst AI ever.
Like literally, I think I could have actual people controlling all the "AI", and people would still throw out the "The AI is terrible!" claim.
Ultimately, why should I waste my time playing a 6/10 or 7/10 game when there's so many 8/10 or 9/10 games out there that I haven't played yet? That you probably haven't played yet either?
I wonder if bungie pulled a halo2 with destiny. Create a super ambitious title but had to scrap most of it due to being too demanding for the less power consoles.
Eh, not really bothered by the reviews. It's good fun and I'll play this for a few hundred hours, most likely.
Because your opinion of a 6/7/8/9/etc. rated game may be different from someone else's.
Buy/play a game because it has a feature set that you enjoy -- not one that does its best to fit a genre ideal for a marketable score.
Or put out a base of the game which is good. Then add to it with dlc etc to make it a far better game.
blessing in disguise?
now i don't have to buy a next gen console.
If I was developing a game I would spend as little time working on AI as possible, because the truth is people don't even know what they are seeing when it comes to AI, and no matter what I do some people will cal8l it the worst AI ever.
Like literally, I think I could have actual people controlling all the "AI", and people would still throw out the "The AI is terrible!" claim.
So you take critic scores over your own opinion? I have never bought am game/ movie etc because critics have given it a high score. The end of the day no one will have the exact opinion then you.
Destiny reminds me alot of Diablo. With the exception that Destiny has great mechanics and Diablo has none.I am not that impressed so far. Hasnt hooked me like borderlands did. I went back to playing diablo last night on my xbox one.
Awesome game in my book. A strong 8/10.
Destiny reminds me alot of Diablo. With the exception that Destiny has great mechanics and Diablo has none.
Talking about 3 of course. You click on stuff. That's basically it if you boil it down, the numbers do the rest. With Destiny this process is covered by pretty good fps mechanics.Diablo I and II had terrible mechanics? Huh?
Diablo 3's a step down but I wouldn't even call that terrible.
If I was developing a game I would spend as little time working on AI as possible, because the truth is people don't even know what they are seeing when it comes to AI, and no matter what I do some people will call it the worst AI ever.
Like literally, I think I could have actual people controlling all the "AI", and people would still throw out the "The AI is terrible!" claim.