Support NeoGAF

[Karim]

On PS5 Pro, these textures are better than PS5 but also of worse quality than on XSX. It's not a texture loading issue when it is all time and noticeable in all instances and at the feet of the character.

Then, you can't you see the difference in LOD at a distance?? It's evident and very clear both in floor and rock textures as well as in vegetation. It's just a matter of not wanting to see it.

PS. The screenshots I have been posting throughout the thread are from up to 4 different comparative videos. I don't need elanalista to tell me what I can observe or see on captures and what conclusions draw.

I don't know any reliable resources who reported better LOD and textures on series X. But you are not new to find missed enhancements on series X multiplat. The xbox brand inside your mind is like the mescaline.

 

[Mr Moose]

Ran the benchmark on high 1440p FSR on "pro like" PC (3600/9060XT). Average 67fps, frame-gen off. FSR looks like shit.

16GB = 896GB/s vs PS5 16GB = 448GB/s.

 

[Darsxx82]

Doble post sorry

 

[Darsxx82]

I don't know any reliable resources who reported better LOD and textures on series X. But you are not new to find missed enhancements on series X multiplat. .

Dude. You have the same source describing that detail... and it does so because it's OBVIOUS to any eye. But it shouldn't be necessary; anyone with two healthy eyes can see what's mentioned in those screenshots, and the difference is more than evident.

The explanation for why this is happening? That's already speculative thing because can be multiple reasons, but this detail is clear and evident, and can be seen in any comparison video or footage.

From here on, dude, look in the mirror. You're the perfect example on this forum of responding without arguments to everything obvious whenever you don't like what you see, and justifying things based on the credibility or lack thereof of the sources "because all are XBOX bias and their heads make them invent things and manipulate". ... When it's in your interest, of course.

Yesterday you defended elanalista as a credible source and open threads with his material. Cover your face a little, man. At least disguise it a little.


PS.

The xbox brand inside your mind is like the mescaline

Sorry, but you repeat yourself a lot. Since you're making personal attacks, at least make some funny ones like yesterday's fabulous : "brain damage from too much sex on the Xbox." Otherwise, besides showing us your frustration and childishness, we'll think you also don't have much wit when you insult.

 

[evanft]

16GB = 896GB/s vs PS5 16GB = 448GB/s. Series X GPU alone has more bandwidth than the PS5 total bandwidth, At 12.5GB for games the GPU bandwidth could be lower on PS5. It literally why XSX has no issue targeting 1440p while the PS5 struggles keep 1080p.

If XSX was the main platform, PS5 would be sweating hard.

Only 12GB Is for games which even Sony stated. PS5 can hold larger game maps but seems to struggle with game res hence the 8GB main + 4GB. Just like how on the PS4 only 5GB out of the 8GB was for games. XSX uses a 10GB RX 6700xt while the Series S is a 8GB RX 6500xt. Leaving the PS5 with a dynamic 4GB RX 6600xt.

Did you just use the fucking Google AI summary as a source?

 

[Mr Moose]

Did you just use the fucking Google AI summary as a source?

My source is that I added them the fuck up!