I can understand that. Multiple prods on one person just seemed a bit excessive. After 2 votes I'm not sure how much more effective a prod can be.
The people giving me a slightly more town than not vibe are
Flatearthpanda
Ferret
Trigger
Freakinchair
Christina
Gryvan
Too many people have no commentary to get a read on
Terra
Exodus
Charleston
Rynam
Seath
Etc
I'm not suggesting everyone else is scummy. It's a disorganized thought summary. I've got twenty people to think about, and my mind can only hold seven things at once.
That is one of the scummiest town lists I've ever seen. That's also one of the scummiest scum lists I've ever seen.
As for my reads, the only player I like so far is freakinchair. His posts have this naive tone
Not really, no. I don't have thoughts on anyone yet. I just don't think it's a good idea to not lynch on the first day.So much suspicion of each other, but is there anyone people think is town? The poor sloth princess Seath doesn't exactly strike me as scummy for one. I think he's become an easy target.
Vote: Septimus Prime
I think you're one of the people taking the easy road. Any thoughts on the other players besides Seath?
??
I didn't post a scum list. And I don't understand why you think the town list is scummy. I don't understand any of your post, really. I'm just trying to keep actual conversation happening, without everything being stuffed with fluff.
My thought process right now is to just think about various Disney princesses and villains and wonder which are in the game. Also, who is the white haired girl in the pic in the OP?
My thought process right now is to just think about various Disney princesses and villains and wonder which are in the game. Also, who is the white haired girl in the pic in the OP?
You know exactly what list I was talking about. Don't let your semantics chasing get ahead of you.
The town list is the 3 people who voted No Lynch. Which is scummy and btw, did you even notice my questioning of these players and their choices that has just gone almost completely ignored? Gryvan is the only one who has been responding. Is that town behavior to you? The other 2 players haven't said jack, either. Trigger is off in dreamland feigning concern over vote prodding. He's scum. You're definitely scum.
You know exactly what list I was talking about. Don't let your semantics chasing get ahead of you.
The town list is the 3 people who voted No Lynch. Which is scummy and btw, did you even notice my questioning of these players and their choices that has just gone almost completely ignored? Gryvan is the only one who has been responding. Is that town behavior to you? The other 2 players haven't said jack, either. Trigger is off in dreamland feigning concern over vote prodding. He's scum. You're definitely scum.
You know exactly what list I was talking about. Don't let your semantics chasing get ahead of you.
The town list is the 3 people who voted No Lynch. Which is scummy and btw, did you even notice my questioning of these players and their choices that has just gone almost completely ignored? Gryvan is the only one who has been responding. Is that town behavior to you? The other 2 players haven't said jack, either. Trigger is off in dreamland feigning concern over vote prodding. He's scum. You're definitely scum.
Pretty sure I explained myself clearly in a few of my posts. This kind of aggressive eclectic posting is going to get you targeted... which makes me question what side you're really on.
Why exactly is aggressive posting scummy to you?
Okay, why is aggressive posting scummy/neutral-ey to you?
Could be trying to draw attention to himself as a target to be lynched or killed at night. Could be trying to assert himself as one of the good guys by aggressively accusing other people and painting himself as a target to mafia (but really he knows he's safe). Lot's of possible reasons.
All you need is your... imagination!
Nah, in our "I RNG my first vote" meta that's a Null read. In fact, I am more suspicious of the people who want to slow this already horribly slow thread further down by lynching active players. If they are driving discussion, they are good in early game, no matter their alignment. That's why you don't ever lynch Sorian before D3.I don't have a better target at this point, and I agree with Christina Mackenzie. In my experience so far, scum often starts off early and casting the first vote because we don't expect them to.
Vote: Unmasked Ferret
I want scum to win.It's a semantic argument. If there's a comma implied in the statement "let's get scummy, ladies" then that does sound pro scum. But I said IF. Anyway I want to see her contribute - it's been over 24 hours since start, correct? I'm poking at lurkers, and I believe she's been on the greater forum.
Nah, that's not how it works. Scum players most likely will have similar or lower activity than they normally have. If RNGesus has a funny day, all Scum players have similar posting activity. The biggets mistake you can make is "ok, we got the high activity Scum, now let's focus on low activity people". Concentrate on actual interaction.Darryl, it might be nothing of course. But it's probable that there are like five scum in such a large game, yes? So I just suspect one would hide in the early morning greetings, and another in the low-post-count batch. I dunno, I've never been here before.
That's at least one level too deep.Could be trying to draw attention to himself as a target to be lynched or killed at night. Could be trying to assert himself as one of the good guys by aggressively accusing other people and painting himself as a target to mafia (but really he knows he's safe). Lot's of possible reasons.
All you need is your... imagination!
That's convenient, isn't it?... Especially since you weren't even scum in your first game.For now i Just Vote on a No Lyncher, because I think that's not a Pro Town move, but I understand the reasoning behind such a Vote because I wanted to do the same thing in my last Game.
vote: Freakinchair
Not really, no. I don't have thoughts on anyone yet. I just don't think it's a good idea to not lynch on the first day.
Nah, in our "I RNG my first vote" meta that's a Null read. If they are driving discussion, they are good in early game, no matter their alignment. That's why you don't ever lynch Sorian before D3.
Anyone who says they are traveling/on holiday is getting a vote from me straight away. It's too much of a stealth scum crutch honestly.
I'll be away from home Thurs-Sun but I assume Night Phase will have taken over by then.
Hmm...
VOTE: gryvan
It would appear you've argued against your own position here. There are just as many reasons for aggressive play to be reflective of town. Without specifying one in the context of the current game you're basically saying you don't actually have an argument to make.
I'll agree with chair, here. Not seeing any town reasons for overly aggressive play. Not to say there aren't any, although I would say it's bad play on either faction if you get people worked up enough they vote for you emotionally. Not saying I see that happening either.Are there? You've supplied none.
Are there? You've supplied none.
Quick question on this, is the spoiler actually true? or was it just a joking spoiler?
And does that mean you can't vote over those specific days before night 1 starts?
Or the Mafia just lets them keep at it until they get lynched. Good reads and investigation would make scum want to silence someone, not gotten harassment.Town player sees slow conversation, this is bad overall for town in the long run, playing aggressively forces other players to respond. Town player has ability that will trigger if night killed, drawing mafia's attention would be a net boon. Town player who is vanilla, plays aggressively to draw attention away from PRs. Etc.
Use your imagination.
Two posts. First makes a possible vanilla town soft claim claiming inactivity for night phase (but that's fine lol! ;P) and the second complaining no one is posting.
So what's popping?
Actually, yeah.VOTE: Terrabyte20xx
2 drive-by votes, a couple images and some goofy story about RNGing yourself. Any thoughts about the state of the game?
A whole 12 hours+ since I posted and it's only been like... barely two pages? GAFIA ain't what it used to be that's for sure. Oh wait, you meant something else? I mean, I do agree with the sentiment for a Day 1 lynch, it's always been a good thing in the end. I don't immediately believe those against are Scum players, just a bit too pacificistic in Mafia.
I still reserve my vote until there's a land slide for the first day but I can always change my mind.
VOTE: Darryl
For now i Just Vote on a No Lyncher, because I think that's not a Pro Town move, but I understand the reasoning behind such a Vote because I wanted to do the same thing in my last Game.
vote: Freakinchair
Actually, yeah.
Fluffy, really really fluffy. For some reason a good majority of posts serve as nothing but filler. Lots of "flavor" posts by people, but not much meat. Daryl is probably the only one on my "town list" because he actually posts like he cares.
As for my own posts, I don't post unless I really have something to say because of this fluffy nonsense. Also, my drive by votes matter, I never do anything without reason.
All that being said:
VOTE: DuskSoldier
Pretty sure I explained myself clearly in a few of my posts. This kind of aggressive eclectic posting is going to get you targeted... which makes me question what side you're really on.
So even though you admit to understanding why a new player would vote no lynch, you decide to vote for the new player advocating a no lynch? Why chair over the others?
So even though you admit to understanding why a new player would vote no lynch, you decide to vote for the new player advocating a no lynch? Why chair over the others?
He was the only one without a Lynch on him. I have no idea who to vote else right now.
Why are you and Royal_Flush picking on Rynam? I see nothing wrong with his vote.
Could be trying to draw attention to himself as a target to be lynched or killed at night. Could be trying to assert himself as one of the good guys by aggressively accusing other people and painting himself as a target to mafia (but really he knows he's safe). Lot's of possible reasons.
All you need is your... imagination!
Oh, ok, I understand now. I have 2 of 3 no voters on my towny list. And 4 others you conveniently gloss over.
Freakinchair is an ultra noob like me. You yourself just said they sound naive and non scummy.
Euphemism isn't on either list I posted.
Gryvan was suspicious to me at first, but his later posts were responsive enough that I backed off my suspicions and moved him up to the pro town list.
Trigger brought up a conversation topic to stir discussion instead of just fluffy posts (wanting to know if anyone seemed Town) and I responded to it so there would be discussion. It didn't seem scummy to me, but you may be right about the other post not wanting pile ons being a bit scummy.
You don't seem to have any arguments against panda, ferret, or christina - do you have any arguments FOR any of them? Or for anyone else for that matter?
I'm truly not arguing semantics (anymore, that was just because there's NOTHING to talk about on the first page and I was excited to play...)
My hear more list is absolutely a neutral list and not a scum list. I hadn't wanted to be rude, but you head up my scum list. I just haven't got all my thoughts together to make a coherent argument, which is why I posted a good/neutral list and saved evil for later. And there would be more people on the hear more list - my evil tending list in my head isn't made of 'everyone else'.
I'm not scum. So skip the drama please.
These are open questions directed to everyone, feel free to answer whenever or not at all.
1.How do you feel about weemadarthur's town list?
2.In regards to freakinchair's feelings on no d1 lynch, do you think he is just a naive new player, agree with him, or feel like maybe he is scum?
3.how do you feel about the Daryll vs weemadarthur thing?
These are open questions directed to everyone, feel free to answer whenever or not at all.
Could be trying to draw attention to himself as a target to be lynched or killed at night. Could be trying to assert himself as one of the good guys by aggressively accusing other people and painting himself as a target to mafia (but really he knows he's safe). Lot's of possible reasons.
All you need is your... imagination!