As for my own posts, I don't post unless I really have something to say because of this fluffy nonsense. Also, my drive by votes matter, I never do anything without reason.
All that being said:
VOTE: DuskSoldier
Yet you constantly fail to provide these reasons. If you want to pressure them, wouldn't it be better to actually build a case? If you want them to trap themselves, wouldn't it be better to not vote them? (Please only do the latter only until a bit prior to day end, so people get a idea of your real opinions in case you should be NK'd)
Why are you and Royal_Flush picking on Rynam? I see nothing wrong with his vote.
Because voting for a "No Lynch"-voter is by far the easiest vote, and Scum loves easy votes. The fact that he was Town when he voted "No Lynch" in his first game doesn't exactly help his case.
Lovely wallflowers coming to life? How wonderful~
This gif creeps me out for some reason.
1.How do you feel about weemadarthur's town list?
2.In regards to freakinchair's feelings on no d1 lynch, do you think he is just a naive new player, agree with him, or feel like maybe he is scum?
3.how do you feel about the Daryll vs weemadarthur thing?
1. Uncalled for, but he started to get some heat. Could very well be "They are on to you, quick, make a reads list" scumchat tip. Reads themselves have no explanation, so not much that I can say about them, but it makes it look even more like an attempt to get out of the heat.
2. The former.
3. I don't know Darryl's alignment, but I do know that weemadarthur is after him for very wrong reasons.
We need the discussion though. Calling certain kinds of posts "pointless" during day 1 is vey counterproductive. Sure, as we learn more and have more info to go on fluff/vague posts will become increasingly frowned upon, but right now? It's literally all we have. It's not so much about the specificity of posts' contents, rather the intention.
I think calling approaches with weak reasoning out is a valid approach, because I hope I can get them to make follow-up mistakes if they're scum.
_______________________________
And now the final act of this post:
[Worst post I've seen in a long time]
You are twisting my words however you please and make up bullshit theories about gambits so obvious a five your old could look through them. The post is so dumb, I didn't even want to answer it at first. But because ignoring you would only drive you deeper into this dark place you are going, I'll try to explain to you what's wrong with this post. Let's start.
Imagine Darryl = Mob Godfather.
ok, fine. That's possible. What do we do with this assumption?
He is more abrasive than normal for really early posts:
He has the highest/very high post count, along with attracting attention by being abrasive. He does normally post a lot, but he also normally tries NOT to look too suspicious.
I don't know where you got the impression Darryl normally doesn't bully Newbies into submission D1, but that's what he always does. If you want to make Meta arguments at least do your homework!
If he's mafia, then he can only desire to attract attention from Town. Why might that be? To get a cop to look at him and clear him (wrongly)! Then he becomes suddenly trusted overnight, and can steer the discussion even more obviously than on day one.
He suppresses the godfather reminder so we don't question the cop's reading:
See, this part actually makes sense.
Now, what are his mafia goons doing? Obfuscation.
Not before it starts getting dangerous. Darryl had only one vote on him and not that much heat. There was not a single reason to intervene just yet and build a connection.
Here Royal is making a point about high post counts being pro town:
He's passing it off as supporting another frequent poster, but really he's subtly supporting Darryl, the MOST active poster.
I thought it was quite obvious what I meant. Sorian was an example that doesn't give you such a hard time liking his many posts.
Then he openly defends Darryl against repercussions from the abrasive posting meant to draw attention from the probable town aligned cop:
He just wants people to overlook any subtle thing that strikes them as scummy in Darryl's posts.
At no point in this game I ever said Darryl was Town. I've never seen Scum Darryl. I have no clue how well he operates on the other side. This looks like normal Darryl. He could be Scum Darryl, I don't know. And I don't fucking care
for the first few days because except him and ocassionally Ferret noone is driving this thread forward. Motion is important especially in the early game and if this motion comes from Scum, fine. Gives us more posts and connections to catch them from other scum flips or - vice versa - get connections to other scum from his flip.
Here, he argues with me that a mafioso won't be found in the low-post-count batch of users. Why? Because Royal himself is one of them! And he wants me to look away!
And here you start blatantly making things up. I never said there isn't Scum in the low-post-count players. That would be fucking retarded. I said Scum isn't necessarily spread out over various activities. They might (and statistically are more likely to than not), but don't have to. Post count is one of the few things that is not a valid connection between Scum players.
They also both have posted lies. The wiki says ejecting liars is good gameplay. Here is Darryl making a false role claim:
Everything I've heard suggests that false role claims pressure actual power roles to claim, so this is something that is harmful to Town. I'm sure he'll say it was an obvious joke, but that's not a good gameplay mechanic, so it makes him expendable.
Here is Royal trying to make a scum claim sound like a joke post:
But it's not a joke, it's the plain truth. His lies are found in his misdirection posts. Or if he's just easily led, and turns out not to be scum, the claim of being scum is a lie. Either way, liars harm Town in the end.
Oh, obvious lies noone ever will believe and were only made to prove a point trigger you? Here, have three more:
- I'm a 72 year old Woman from Nebraska.
- Ynnny gave me a list with all player's alignment because we have a long term sexual relationship.
- In 1985 Mexico nuked the entire West Coast of the US.
If you want to go after me, fine. But please find actual scummy behavior and don't make up bullshit.
