I'd also like to keep an eye on Enker.
4th vote on Seath. 3rd vote on Terra. That's 2 bandwagons from him.
Actually, now that I notice that...I think he's a stronger candidate than Sept.
Vote: Enker
I don't think I'm going to move my vote around today, but obviously I'm open to it If someone can build a compelling case.
I guess my vote will go to Unmasked Ferret for the crime of being trigger happy.
VOTE: Unmasked Ferret
I voted for you because you're scum. Obviously. You know you're scum. I know it. Every post you make reeks of it.
People voting GC: Who of you makes this a policy vote and who gets actual scum votes from him?
-Don't lie about real life stuff.
-Don't question real life stuff.
If everyone would follow those two simple rules, it should never become a problem.
On this, can we replace in us the three UZ timezones South Tokyo time gmt+9. I spent most of my life in that country and those motherfuckers don't need three times. Network television only got two when i was growing up and that is literally catered to the lowest common denominator.YNnny, could we please have a countdown card for this page? I can't pay attention properly to vote counts and time when they get to another pageload.
YNnny, could we please have a countdown card for this page? I can't pay attention properly to vote counts and time when they get to another pageload.
On this, can we replace in us the three UZ timezones South Tokyo time gmt+9. I spent most of my life in that country and those motherfuckers don't need three times. Network television only got two when i was growing up and that is literally catered to the lowest common denominator.
Indeed, Dusk Soldier ought to come in and make a real vote. However I don't find his post content otherwise to be a problem. It's vague but not anti town.
You, terra, have not provided explanation of your previous votes. Thick as you are, you must know that that is what people are asking for. Given that you may be executed in a couple of hours, I want you typing up the explanation so we have it for later.
As for septimus, I can't make any argument to defend him. So I understand those voting for him. I'm not persuaded to change my vote, but he's the sort of player whose card I want to see.
Looks like I finished my gown just in time.
I guess my vote will go to Unmasked Ferret for the crime of being trigger happy.
VOTE: Unmasked Ferret
The game I played with Sorian, I tried to lynch him day 1 too. It's funny that you mentioned him. lol.
tea biscuits? really?
Where I come from, tea is served with crumpets, scones, and cakes. Goodness. Next you'll be telling me you add sugar to your tea...
no, he made a day 1 role claim and I wanted to see his flip. lol
It's not just about the numbers, whenever someone dies the town gains information.
You have to think a little further outside of the box then that.
For one, it's not going to be a unanimous vote. So that "we" killed the doctor, can easily become, "who" killed the doctor.
Once you know "who" killed the doctor, you can then start to look at the why for how each individual princess voted, and so on and so forth.
We're not allowed to post in this thread during the night phase, that's all he meant by that.
It's pointless in the sense that it's pointless to make day 1 votes based on day 1 discussion.
But obviously 4 or 5 days down the road, a lot of the discussion happening now can turn into a gold mine of good information.
I don't think I'm going to move my vote around today, but obviously I'm open to it If someone can build a compelling case.
I think we were all assigned random princesses, but I doubt they have any correlation to our actual roles or alignments.
Terrabyte20xx, I think it's really weird that you feel this confident that you think you can peg a scum player out of 20 random posters after only a few days of discussion and zero flips.
I voted for Unmasked Ferret because I think he was a little too quick to the gun on lynching, and while his reasoning was frivolous I still felt it was a little too specifically targeted. He could have just claimed RNG like a few of the other early lynchers did.
Your last post actually makes me think you are most likely town. I feel like a scum player wouldn't risk making that bold an accusation and having the player flip town. Not on day 1 anyway.
If you think i should vote for someone else, I'm all ears, but I don't see a scum player slipping up this early in the game.
It's totally fair to point out my naïveté. After all, you don't know me. You can't look at my play style to meta game because I haven't got one.I AM NOT DYING TODAY!! Not if I have anything to say about it. Not to be mean, but you're new. You wouldn't notice the fact that his posts barely contribute to THIS game.
These are all his posts from the game. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. Notice what most of his posts comprise of? Stuff like: "It's only day one" or "In this game I though this or that", Heck, his last one is commenting on roles.
A newbie would look at these and think: "Hey, these are actually pretty helpful."
But look at them again, and You'll find that they don't even ONCE actually contribute to actively finding scum. If you can't even see that, then I think we've found Scum #2.
Honestly, quoting every post seems more likely to obfuscate than highlight and that would generally be a red flag for me, but i see where you're coming from. He's still more useful and less damaging than certain others imo. Lynch him later if he doesn't change. For now, I think there are worse.I AM NOT DYING TODAY!! Not if I have anything to say about it. Not to be mean, but you're new. You wouldn't notice the fact that his posts barely contribute to THIS game.
These are all his posts from the game. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. Notice what most of his posts comprise of? Stuff like: "It's only day one" or "In this game I though this or that", Heck, his last one is commenting on roles.
A newbie would look at these and think: "Hey, these are actually pretty helpful."
But look at them again, and You'll find that they don't even ONCE actually contribute to actively finding scum. If you can't even see that, then I think we've found Scum #2.
Excuse me, WHAT HAVE I REFUSED TO TYPE?!?!?It's totally fair to point out my naïveté. After all, you don't know me. You can't look at my play style to meta game because I haven't got one.
But this, this is a bad play. Conflating "not anti town" to "helpful" is silly. I know you and I know what you'll do - panic and throw shade at nearly random people in a last ditch effort to avoid death. Your refusal to type up your reasoning for the legacy benefit to Town is scummy to the end.
You'd be better off jumping on a bandwagon of someone who might actually get enough votes to surpass yours.
Mind you, part of my non antipathy toward Dusk comes from the post you missed - it has reasoning. I don't think it makes any sense, but he defended his stance, so....
Reasons for most of your votes? You say you don't want to influence the but what they've already said is set in stone and we're approaching end of day. Much worse to meant town confused than to tip off scum who are already more attuned to our calls.Excuse me, WHAT HAVE I REFUSED TO TYPE?!?!?
And if you're talking about my strategy, it's simple. My drive by's were false accusations with no true reasoning for the sake of getting a response. People don't like it when you post a vote for " no reason" so I was hoping to get reactions from that. Depending on how they did is what would shape how I would advance. Problem is, no one responded.
You ought to post your reasoning for who you chose for this technique. You must have had a reason for each user.
And that wasn't a good tactic. You tried it and it failed. You should have abandoned it, at least 12 hours ago real time, if the lights were all on upstairs.
Please note that I haven't voted for you. I simply have seen nothing you've posted that convinces me you would be valuable through to day two.
Hi. I'm not scum. Obviously I don't have proof, and I don't think people piling onto me are scum either, per se. I'm not even miffed if I get the axe, since I don't think no lynch is a good play. However, let me ask you this:
Do you want to kill a snowman?
Why would you claim lovers? =/
Hi. I'm not scum. Obviously I don't have proof, and I don't think people piling onto me are scum either, per se. I'm not even miffed if I get the axe, since I don't think no lynch is a good play. However, let me ask you this:
Do you want to kill a snowman?
If we weren't neck-and-neck on the chopping block with about an hour left, we might have had a different approach.Why would you claim lovers? =/
In this post you are Olaf, then in the next you're Anna? Perhaps the mafia thread is full of "!!!!!"
Maybe take a look at this guy if Terra and I don't make it.In this post you are Olaf, then in the next you're Anna? Perhaps the mafia thread is full of "!!!!!"
While nobody seems to be counter claiming those role names, it means nothing because mafia could have a list of available names.
I don't think you're lovers, I think you're barely even friends.
Anna and Elsa sing that song.
Elsa has one line: "Go away, Anna."Wait, relistened to it, just Anna.
At work on phone
Next time claim Masons
Can't ever really interpret seath logically, this at the least will remove a distraction.