There was a movement to get that word bannable on here too, if I recall correctly.
Yeah I'm losing track of all the words we're banning or trying to ban here.
There was a movement to get that word bannable on here too, if I recall correctly.
The ones directed at women can also be used on men.
Agreed.My problem with all of this stems from the fact that GAF is a pretty liberal/progressive place. I don't really think these groups, while still minorities, are nearly as ostracized or in need of protection as the moderation thinks, at least on this site. People seem to be pretty open here about all sorts of viewpoints/lifestyles, and it's accomplished mostly through methods other than intimidation.
It feels unnecessary, bordering on white-knighting to me. Yes, words have power, but it feels like outright banning them gives them more of it, and ignores the fact that they have the power to change over time. Some of the uses I've seen for gendered words on this site and their subsequent bans don't even seem to be cases where they were used as slurs against any group in particular, but just generalized insults, as these words sometimes have transformed into.
And there we go. That's all there really is to it. I'm surprised that the "but what about men" argument could even transcend to slurs, when the only slurs for men aim to depict them as "less than a man".
And there we go. That's all there really is to it. I'm surprised that the "but what about men" argument could even transcend to slurs, when the only slurs for men aim to depict them as "less than a man".
Yeah I'm losing track of all the words we're banning or trying to ban here.
I prefer child man.Exactly, like manchild.
And there we go. That's all there really is to it. I'm surprised that the "but what about men" argument could even transcend to slurs, when the only slurs for men aim to depict them as "less than a man".
And there we go. That's all there really is to it. I'm surprised that the "but what about men" argument could even transcend to slurs, when the only slurs for men aim to depict them as "less than a man".
And there we go. That's all there really is to it. I'm surprised that the "but what about men" argument could even transcend to slurs, when the only slurs for men aim to depict them as "less than a man".
Yeah I'm losing track of all the words we're banning or trying to ban here.
What a dickish thing to say. This guy's a real cock about this issue. Just a total asshole.
Still not the same but if people want those banned too they should just say so. Otherwise it seems like trying to argue the male insults are equivalent (also slurs) in order so that they can keep saying the ones directed at women. Which is it.
Does "bastard" imply you're "less than a man"?
(I understand that technically it can apply to women as well, but I see it almost exclusively used to men.)
What a dickish thing to say. This guy's a real cock about this issue. Just a total asshole.
If you believe that calling somebody bitch is an attempt to make them seem feminine, then you must believe that women are more likely to complain and be selfish.I've seen dick used on both men and women. Any time it's used against women it's not meant that she is displaying masculinity. It means she is being a jerk.
Now I've heard men called a bitch. Or a pussy. In those contexts, it is always used to make them seem feminine. Being more like a woman IS the insult. Which makes it an entirely different beast.
And I've never heard cock used in that context.
I was specifically responding to the idea that all slurs directed at men are demeaning towards their sex. Which they aren't, someone can try to argue that they are, but all that genital focus doesn't seem to land the same way on men as it does if you call a woman a cunt or something. If anything, those just seem to affirm that males who act stupidly are just seen as ALPHA DAWGZ or something.
As I posted on the previous page, this issue begins and ends with context. Nobody needs to whine about the PC police, it's simply about not being a shithead to people. Not banning a specific word.
That a popgaf thing?where does bitch mob fall into all of this?
Still not the same but if people want those banned too they should just say so. Otherwise it seems like trying to argue the male insults are equivalent (also slurs) in order so that they can keep saying the ones directed at women. Which is it.
I've seen dick used on both men and women. Any time it's used against women it's not meant that she is displaying masculinity. It means she is being a jerk.
I always feel like you could look at calling somebody a "dick" as describing them as over-masculine and aggressive (in a sort of male-dominated way).
At least, that's an interpretation one could come to if we were applying the same microscope that we use while deriding other (female) gendered insults.
My problem with all of this stems from the fact that GAF is a pretty liberal/progressive place. I don't really think these groups, while still minorities, are nearly as ostracized or in need of protection as the moderation thinks, at least on this site. People seem to be pretty open here about all sorts of viewpoints/lifestyles, and it's accomplished mostly through methods other than intimidation.
It feels unnecessary, bordering on white-knighting to me. Yes, words have power, but it feels like outright banning them gives them more of it, and ignores the fact that they have the power to change over time. Some of the uses I've seen for gendered words on this site and their subsequent bans don't even seem to be cases where they were used as slurs against any group in particular, but just generalized insults, as these words sometimes have transformed into.
I insult all people equally.
Some of the uses I've seen for gendered words on this site and their subsequent bans don't even seem to be cases where they were used as slurs against any group in particular, but just generalized insults, as these words sometimes have transformed into.
Does "bastard" imply you're "less than a man"?
(I understand that technically it can apply to women as well, but I see it almost exclusively used to men.)
If you believe that calling somebody bitch is an attempt to make them seem feminine, then you must believe that women are more likely to complain and be selfish.
My point still stands that there is no insult that really attacks manhood. Bastard is used mostly against men, but it isn't an attack on masculinity, or a word meant to devalue men. If you called a woman a "bastard", you are not chastising her for being like a man.
Manchild is used exclusively on men, but it only works in the context of a man who is viewed as highly immature, and isn't attacking his manliness, but his immaturity.
My problem with all of this stems from the fact that GAF is a pretty liberal/progressive place. I don't really think these groups, while still minorities, are nearly as ostracized or in need of protection as the moderation thinks, at least on this site. People seem to be pretty open here about all sorts of viewpoints/lifestyles, and it's accomplished mostly through methods other than intimidation.
It feels unnecessary, bordering on white-knighting to me. Yes, words have power, but it feels like outright banning them gives them more of it, and ignores the fact that they have the power to change over time. Some of the uses I've seen for gendered words on this site and their subsequent bans don't even seem to be cases where they were used as slurs against any group in particular, but just generalized insults, as these words sometimes have transformed into.
My point still stands that there is no insult that really attacks manhood. Bastard is used mostly against men, but it isn't an attack on masculinity, or a word meant to devalue men. If you called a woman a "bastard", you are not chastising her for being like a man.
Manchild is used exclusively on men, but it only works in the context of a man who is viewed as highly immature, and isn't attacking his manliness, but his immaturity.
I'm not following.
I've never really associated "bitch" with any gender. I grew up with it just meaning mean and whiny.
"Stop being such a bitch" is usually employed to tell someone to suck it up and stop whining. If this is to be taken as making them seem femine, then they're also saying that being femine means incessant whining.
This is an impressive paragraph, combining as it does three different bad arguments into one unified whole, ala Captain Planet:
* "it's just white-knighting"
* "gay just means stupid"
* "banning words makes them more powerful"
Unfortunately, none of them make any actual sense.
Guy/Girl: You're such a _____(Insert whatever insult you want)
Me: Wow! That hurt. Hahahaa
Just laughing at whatever they say to you is probably the best method. It turns it completely back on them and pisses them off even more since they didn't get a rise out of you. Since, that's the whole point of insults anyway isn't it?
My point still stands that there is no insult that really attacks manhood. Bastard is used mostly against men, but it isn't an attack on masculinity, or a word meant to devalue men. If you called a woman a "bastard", you are not chastising her for being like a man.
This sort of dismissive reaction doesn't really help to enlighten me to the point you're trying to make and, in fact, sort of turns me off to it, even though I'd be receptive otherwise.
The point of slurs is to remind the person that they're inferior.
Don't know if I agree with this. How about that horrible F word that rhymes with "bag it." For a long long time it was (and still is) used to demean men, whether they be gay or not. In fact, most gay slurs, I would argue, directly attack a man's manhood, because of the misguided and ridiculous notion that being gay some how makes you less of a man.
But it only works if you get pissed off about it and let the person know it bothers you.