So much mumbling. Would it kill people to enunciate?
Part of it's the mixing.
But maybe they also did a lot more ADR back in the days of RTD? Voices seemed a lot clearer back then.
So much mumbling. Would it kill people to enunciate?
my guess is thatthe doctor is mopey after the death of clara, decides to go and see river to cheer himself up, but she doesn't recognise him
it seems kind of implausible that river doesn't believe he's the doctor though, given that she knows that time lords regenerate
I continue to not like episodes by Mark Gatiss.
But other than that he may have sank to Steve Thompson levels for me. Which annoys me because I hate blacklisting writers, but you can only give a guy so many chances.
Spoilers for Christmas and what the River/12 relationship will be like via a UK newspaper
Despite her shock festive return, Doctor Who , played by Peter Capaldi, still faces being lonely this Christmas because River doesnt recognise his new reincarnation and keeps romancing other fellas.
The lovelorn Timelord ends up chasing River around the universe in a vain bid to to win over her affections.
Show-runner Steven Moffat admitted that the Christmas special wasnt very festive - but thered be lots of kissing and flirting as Doctor Who turns into a saucy romcom.
Peter said: It is a lighthearted fun thing River doesnt recognise the Doctor and he gets upset because she is flirting and doing all sort of stuff with people.
She simply cannot be persuaded that he is the former Matt Smith/David Tennant/Christopher Eccleston - so there is lots of kissing, but not between River and the doctor!
I enjoyed this episode.
The whole point is that the scientist was secretly a Sandman and he orchestrated the events of the video to transmit the static signal as THAT'S what's creating the Sandmen. Not an infection.
Just watched it. If this is the case, didn't he succeed? So the Doctor didn't actually save the day this time? Will that all come back up at some point? That a mad scientist sandman just sent the signal to the whole solar system?
Sounds a bit rubbish to be honest. I figured the special would be pretty much an excuse to have Capaldi and Kingston bounce off each other, but if that summary's true, it could easily turn into a trainwreck.
Oh well, here's hoping it's better than it sounds (or that the Mirror's just pulling things out of their behind - though I don't think they'd fabricate quotes.)
They've not fabricated them quite verifiably, as it seems this has been their teaser info for Christmas at the Who convention that took place in London this weekend.
A shame about this season. Moffat is legit one of the best, if not the best, Doctors and yet he gets hampered with middling to boring storylines.
Exactly. River's last appearance was in 'Name Of The Doctor' and she 'died' in that episode. She 'died' believing the Doctor was about to die, too, as foretold in that prophecy. As far as she's concerned, the Doctor is dead. His regenerations ended at Eleven. To have a grumpy, Scottish old guy approach you, telling you he's the Doctor, would be a lot to get over, given you know your husband died on Trenzalore.She would have never met Twelve before, though. Originally the Doctor dies on Trenzalore as Eleven. The Time Lords changed history by giving the Doctor a new cycle of regenerations, so River has never encountered Twelve or any regeneration past him.
Worse than Fear Her? Worse than The Wedding of River Song?That might literally have been the dumbest episode of new Who.
Flat out boring as shit too.
Worse than Fear Her? Worse than The Wedding of River Song?
Nothing is worse than Colin Baker's first episode.
Nothing.
You joke, but one very angry guy in our writer's Q&A asked him why he thought Doctor Who fans were idiots because he couldn't say there wasn't a full series next year.
This was super uninteresting.
Last time an episode felt this waste-of-timeish was during season 6
She's been officially announced for it, so that's not a spoiler now. But what she's doing in it, obviously we don't know that yet.I haven't highlighted any of the spoilers regarding the Christmas special so I'm guessing all this talk about River Song is just people arbitrarily mentioning her right? I only mention it because if we were to try and spoiler stuff and then just openly talk about her then people might start to think that she was involved in some way.
She's been officially announced for it, so that's not a spoiler now. But what she's doing in it, obviously we don't know that yet.
I haven't highlighted any of the spoilers regarding the Christmas special so I'm guessing all this talk about River Song is just people arbitrarily mentioning her right? I only mention it because if we were to try and spoiler stuff and then just openly talk about her then people might start to think that she was involved in some way.
I have no idea what happened in the last episode.
Didn't help I'm on pain med and zoned off here and there but what? What the jump scare thing was going on at the end?
I'm surprised at how many people didn't understand the episode's ending, I felt it was pretty clearly laid out. The footage of the episode, in universe, has been put together specifically to get us to watch it and spread the infection, which is housed in the static. Reese Sheersmith's character is playing with Tropes to create something that people will want to watch and spread. The issue I think is that it didn't seem like an episode of Doctor Who, more like an episode of Inside No. 9 or similar, where it's a little self contained, slightly unsettling spooky story. The whole episode is very deliberately from outside of The Doctor's perspective, playing with him not understanding what happened, and he's just distracted and outwitted by the bad guy, as are we.
I'm surprised at how many people didn't understand the episode's ending, I felt it was pretty clearly laid out. The issue I think is that it didn't seem like an episode of Doctor Who, more like an episode of Inside No. 9 or similar, where it's a little self contained, slightly unsettling spooky story. The footage of the episode, in universe, has been put together specifically to get us to watch it and spread the infection, which is housed in the static. Reese Sheersmith's character is playing with horror/suspense tropes to create a story, something that people will want to watch. He's engineering these story beats to drive up tension and keep people watching. The whole episode is very deliberately from outside of The Doctor's perspective, playing with him not understanding what happened, and he's just distracted and outwitted by the bad guy, as are we. His confusion at the end is him knowing that something's not right, but being pushed off the station leading to him having to abandon what's happening without getting to the true nature of the infection.
Starting to wonder if Sleep No More was originally written as the first part of a two-parter, and then the second part was dropped and they just put out part one with minimal tweaking.
It was envisioned as a 2-parter, but he didn't think it would support it. As it turns out it didn't support 1 either.
Well, there is the stuff for a good idea in there. It just got wrapped up in an. at best, uneven episode.
The wrap-up was the story though, the rest was so weak and messy because it had worked backwards from a cheap gotcha so it ultimately didn't matter.
Wow. I enjoyed this episode quite a bit more than the likes of Kill the Moon, Forest of the Night episodes, or most of last series, really. It's certainly not on the same level as the sublime Zygon Inversion, but I thought it to be at least a solid Who episode in its own right and it really doesn't possess the kind of weaknesses that made those other episodes so unbearable to watch.Just finished Sleep No More. That episode was absolute trash, one of the worst I've seen in a long while (yes, worse than last series Forest garbage, worse than Kill The Moon). This was Fear Her levels of bad, and the best thing I can say about it is that since it was not a two-parter, I won't ever need to watch it again.
What a disappointment after the wonderful Zygon Inversion.