Donald Trump is corrupt.af

Status
Not open for further replies.
I truly believe this.

The Trump supporter who believed in "drain the swamp" is a complete dupe. They look like the people buying scratch tickets at Seven Eleven at 3am. Rubes. Dupes. Marks. Take your pick of what to call them... Poor, low educated people who loved an angry man saying what they wanted to hear at that moment. But he ain't going to do shit for these people. He's all about enriching himself and his peers.

Comes across as slightly patronising. The only way to get this mess sorted is to engage properly with these people and try to ease their fears/solve their problems.
 
Let's assume there is substance to both, that would still mean Trump's swamp is magnitudes deeper.

When I see actual corruption I'll believe it. Having stakes in business or involving corporate interests in governance is not corruption.

Also, from the posts I've read from you, I would've guessed you're a Trump supporter. Apologies if not.

I'm a good policy supporter and I hate identity politics. This place is heavy on the latter and pretty scarce on the former, probably why I tend to come up opposing the Democrats.

Trumps trade policies would annihilate the poor.
 
Mmm, just like all the substance to those Hillary claims.
Are you going to attempt to refute anything, or just continue blessing us with your faux-intellectualism?

Trump is factually corrupt, and there is mountains of evidence in these links and elsewhere to confirm it. There is no equivalent factual evidence against Hillary, as claiming something is not the same as truth. Similarly, what post-truth Trump supporters tarred Hillary with is about optics, not a pursuit of truth.

This corrosive both sides shit remains the most tellingly vapid exercise this whole cycle. Try harder to come up with relevant analysis so you dont bore us to tears with more mental farts.
 
The site's just called corrupt.af, a little preface why the focus is just on trump would make the motivations of the site more clear.

When you open up the site, the first thing you see is a picture of Trump with the caption: "Donald Trump is corrupt a(s) f(uck)."
 
Are you going to attempt to refute anything, or just continue blessing us with your faux-intellectualism?

Trump is factually corrupt, and there is mountains of evidence in these links and elsewhere to confirm it. There is no equivalent factual evidence against Hillary, as claiming something is not the same as truth. Similarly, what post-truth Trump supporters tarred Hillary with is about optics, not a pursuit of truth.

This corrosive both sides shit remains the most tellingly vapid exercise this whole cycle. Try harder to come up with relevant analysis so you dont bore us to tears with more mental farts.

Such fire.
 
It's a bit more of a pressing issue for that trait to be tied to the President of the United States though no?

He's worthy of being watched like a hawk sure but assumming he's already done more damage than certain politicians currently in office is a bit silly.
 
Comes across as slightly patronising. The only way to get this mess sorted is to engage properly with these people and try to ease their fears/solve their problems.

They don't want solutions, they want fantasies. Trying to engage them on this plane of reality is pointless, they have to feel the effects themselves before they have any chance of being reached.
 
He's worthy of being watched like a hawk sure but assumming he's already done more damage than certain politicians currently in office is a bit silly.

Given the way he has conducted himself in his business dealings it is almost certain he has done more damage than certain politicians.

This site would be apropos even if he wasn't president. He is corrupt as fuck.
 
Comes across as slightly patronising. The only way to get this mess sorted is to engage properly with these people and try to ease their fears/solve their problems.
Somebody should do that, but not me. I'm here to tell them they are useful idiots.

Fact check or die.
 
Comes across as slightly patronising. The only way to get this mess sorted is to engage properly with these people and try to ease their fears/solve their problems.

That's what you americans should do as individuals.

However, there also needs to be people pointing out the obvious.
 
#AllCorruptionMatters

Seriously, he is the next President. You surely understand why his corruption is a bit more in the spotlight then others.

I agree with the "more" but he's getting all the spotlight in this case. At the very least the site could also follow his "basket of deplorables". =)
 
I agree with the "more" but he's getting all the spotlight in this case. At the very least the site could also follow his "basket of deplorables". =)
It would take away from the point of the website: showing the corruption of Donald Trump.

All this "but others do it too" is just distracting from the actual discussion at hand, which is Trumps corruption.
 
I truly believe this.

The Trump supporter who believed in "drain the swamp" is a complete dupe. They look like the people buying scratch tickets at Seven Eleven at 3am. Rubes. Dupes. Marks. Take your pick of what to call them... Poor, low educated people who loved an angry man saying what they wanted to hear at that moment. But he ain't going to do shit for these people. He's all about enriching himself and his peers.
I prefer the term "live ones", we've got a bunch of live ones in this country.
 
He's worthy of being watched like a hawk sure but assumming he's already done more damage than certain politicians currently in office is a bit silly.

The site doesn't even mention that so okay? This is a fruitless discussion to have. I thought oppression Olympics was bad but now we have the corruption winter games.
 
For someone who bothers to follow, and then comment on politics, you'd think trying to float some 'Whataboutism' would be embarrassing. But the Trump Defense Force is evergreen in their deceit. Sad!

Meet the next POTUS and his penchant for destroying emails while under court order not to.

We see ya, bruh.

While this certainly reflects bad on Trump, if you're fine with Hilary doing it without legal consequence, Trump should get a pass too. (IMO both should suffer legal consequences.)

What say you, bro.
 
Comes across as slightly patronising. The only way to get this mess sorted is to engage properly with these people and try to ease their fears/solve their problems.

The problem there however is one of ego.

If their images of self-worth and reality are warped to dangerous degrees, how can you get through them? This is no different than trying to put religion in the coffin it belongs in: by confronting people, paradoxically, people will double down. They will let their dangerous views, ideas, and values become a fist to strike the world with.

How do you convince people this was a con if you can toss facts but their feelings are that God chose him to lead us, for example? This is the type of batshit nonsense I have to deal with on a daily basis. Rural America is home to this virus of thought.
 
While this certainly reflects bad on Trump, if you're fine with Hilary doing it without legal consequence, Trump should get a pass too. (IMO both should suffer legal consequences.)

What say you, bro.

To warrant a criminal charge, Mr. Comey said, there had to be evidence that Mrs. Clinton intentionally transmitted or willfully mishandled classified information. The F.B.I. found neither, and as a result, he said, “our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Let me know when Trump is the target of 30 years of concerted witch-hunts and outright lies by a major American political party. Until then, your attempts to run interference for the fascist talking yam are a distraction, son.
 
Or deletes stuff after being subpoenaed. >.>
Half true. Personal Emails on her server were routinely deleted after they handed over all work related emails. As per the norm, personal emails were deleted. They receive subpoena to retain personal emails. The person managing her ser at Platte Networks deletes them as per their original contract to delete emails older than 60 days. He gets into trouble and pleads the fifth. He said it was a lapse of judgment. Trump's timeline is correct. They received subpoena, IT guy still deletes emails. However (politifact)
the implication — that Clinton deleted emails relevant to the subpoena in order to avoid scrutiny — is unprovable if not flat wrong.
FBI's Comey himself said this confusion was not deliberate. They were able to retrieve some work related emails from the deleted ones. There is no grand conspiracy unless you believe Platte Networks was also in Hillary's pockets but by then there's no point in arguing further.

Now compare that to litany of accusations against the self-professed Sexual Predator we have for President Elect. There is no equivalency. Believing this email nonsense was equivalent to the volumes of scandals from Trump is what got us into this mess.
 
While this certainly reflects bad on Trump, if you're fine with Hilary doing it without legal consequence, Trump should get a pass too. (IMO both should suffer legal consequences.)

What say you, bro.
Sure. Comey said there was no deliberate attempt to destroy evidence after a grand witch hunt. There was no case. When can we expect FBI to examine Trump's emails? Trump's ties to Russia? Deals? Its only fair, no.
 
In forty years when people look back at the Trump presidency as one of the darkest and most morally inexcusable chapters in American History, people who tried to muddy the waters or run interference for this racist fascist are going to be looked at just as reprehensively as the American Firsters.

One has to choose their sides, because the world is watching. History will judge men for who they are now and what principles they stood for in the face of such obvious horror. You can either be the people condemningly mocked in future documentaries for your obscene acquiescence to this evil, or you can put your foot down and fight for actual justice against this monster.
 
Let me know when Trump is the target of 30 years of concerted witch-hunts and outright lies by a major American political party. Until then, your attempts to run interference for the fascist talking yam are a distraction, son.

Half true. Personal Emails on her server were routinely deleted after they handed over all work related emails. As per the norm, personal emails were deleted. They receive subpoena to retain personal emails. The person managing her ser at Platte Networks deletes them as per their original contract to delete emails older than 60 days. He gets into trouble and pleads the fifth. He said it was a lapse of judgment. Trump's timeline is correct. They received subpoena, IT guy still deletes emails. However (politifact)

FBI's Comey himself said this confusion was not deliberate. They were able to retrieve some work related emails from the deleted ones. There is no grand conspiracy unless you believe Platte Networks was also in Hillary's pockets but by then there's no point in arguing further.

Now compare that to litany of accusations against the self-professed Sexual Predator we have for President Elect. There is no equivalency. Believing this email nonsense was equivalent to the volumes of scandals from Trump is what got us into this mess.

I'm willing to give Hilary the benefit of the doubt on this, I'm no supporter of either, I found Benrie most to my liking and I live in the EU.

Sure. Comey said there was no deliberate attempt to destroy evidence after a grand witch hunt. There was no case. When can we expect FBI to examine Trump's emails? Trump's ties to Russia? Deals? Its only fair, no.

Is there no government body overseeing the president's actions in the US? The current and future president should be watched for acts of sedition of course.
 
Every aspect of government is now controlled by Trumps party, soon including the highest court in the land. Down to the state level. Republicans spent more money investigating the indisputably false Benghazi scandal than we did Watergate, and these noxious hypocrites already said they would consider any investigation into Russian hacks of our election to be partisan. That is a glimpse at the evil leading a nation they so clearly despise now.

Who do you propose oversee Trumps endless parade of corruption?
 
I'm willing to give Hilary the benefit of the doubt on this, I'm no supporter of either, I found Benrie most to my liking and I live in the EU.

Shorter: "I have no idea what i'm talking about but I felt compelled to blovitate about it anyways. Please ignore me on the subject of American politics in the future."
 
Every aspect of government is now controlled by Trumps party, soon including the highest court in the land. Down to the state level. Republicans spent more money investigating the indisputably false Benghazi scandal than we did Watergate, and these noxious hypocrites already said they would consider any investigation into Russian hacks of our election to be partisan. That is a glimpse at the evil leading a nation they so clearly despise now.

Who do you propose oversee Trumps endless parade of corruption?

Looks like you pointed out another flaw in political system.
 
Not sure if serious. In the history of the republic, there has NEVER been a president as corrupt and ethically compromised as Trump. Nobody else comes close.
Well, no. The Gilded Age Presidents were pretty fucking corrupt, and Trump's cabinet looks to be a return to those ignoble days.
 
Nice. They should do the same with the Clintons.
No they shouldnt because

A.) She wasnt very corrupt - especially not relative to Trump - so the site would get boring fast

B.) She isnt the fucking president so her "corruption" is not going to insipidly spread to all levels of government at a rate unseen in our lives.

P.S. Can you guys PLEASE try harder? It is embarrassing already.
 
Shorter: "I have no idea what i'm talking about but I felt compelled to blovitate about it anyways. Please ignore me on the subject of American politics in the future."

No, people like RustyNails can come along and shed imporant light on imporant details. If I hadn't say anything, he wouldn't have pointed this out and I still would've been less informed.
 
Hahahaha! I'm dead because its true. The news is fake and the corruption is real only when it benefits Democrats.
Sure, we should make one for every person that lost the Presidential election... /s

I see the battle against Clinton is continuing even after she has left the political stage. Amazing.
 
Sure, we should make one for every person that lost the Presidential election... /s

I see the battle against Clinton is continuing even after she has left the political stage. Amazing.
It is less against Clinton than that Trump's deplorables have learned how to help him gaslight. Deflect, deflect, deflect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom