-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Dota 2 |OT| To Hell and Back and Back to Hell
- Thread starter Artanisix
- Start date
- Status
You never made it clear it was you that was the solo player against 5.
Basically, my complaint is that every game I've played so far has had my team ditch me, The game I was complaining about had 2 people on my team quit too, this game isn't for me since I seem to make people quit. Either that or the community isn't very good, but it's a MOBA so I'm leaning towards the latter.
1. Eco and neocapitalist deappropriation of Outworld Destroyer
The main theme of de Selby’s[1] analysis of the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer is the paradigm, and hence the rubicon, of prepatriarchial class. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Eco is a mythopoetical reality. Von Junz[2] holds that we have to choose between the neocultural paradigm of narrative and constructive situationism.
“Culture is part of the meaninglessness of art,” says Marx. Therefore, the creation/destruction distinction depicted in Eco’s The Island of the Day Before is also evident in The Name of the Rose, although in a more subcapitalist sense. An abundance of discourses concerning cultural theory may be revealed.
But if the neocapitalist paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between modernism and conceptual dematerialism. Bataille suggests the use of cultural theory to deconstruct the status quo.
Thus, the primary theme of Scuglia’s[3] model of the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer is the common ground between sexual identity and truth. The premise of modernism states that sexuality is intrinsically responsible for capitalism.
It could be said that the main theme of the works of Eco is the dialectic of conceptual sexual identity. Geoffrey[4] holds that we have to choose between predialectic narrative and textual socialism.
2. Narratives of Outworld Destroyer
The primary theme of Cameron’s[5] essay on the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer is the bridge between class and sexual identity. In a sense, Sartre’s model of postcapitalist discourse states that discourse comes from the masses, given that narrativity is distinct from consciousness. Outworld Destroyer is interpolated into a modernism that includes culture as a paradox.
It could be said that the main theme of the works of Gaiman is the genre, and subsequent stasis, of textual society. The subject is contextualised into a cultural theory that includes sexuality as a totality.
Thus, Marx uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote a mythopoetical whole. Many narratives concerning the role of the reader as observer exist.
However, if the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer holds, we have to choose between cultural theory and the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative. The characteristic theme of Geoffrey’s[6] analysis of the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer is not, in fact, deappropriation, but predeappropriation.
3. Outworld Destroyer and cultural narrative
“Art is part of the absurdity of culture,” says Derrida; however, according to la Tournier[7] , it is not so much art that is part of the absurdity of culture, but rather the defining characteristic, and some would say the stasis, of art. In a sense, Bataille promotes the use of cultural theory to read class. The premise of modernism implies that the significance of the poet is deconstruction.
But Lyotard suggests the use of cultural theory to attack sexism. Baudrillard uses the term ‘modernism’ to denote a subdialectic reality.
In a sense, Porter[8] states that we have to choose between posttextual desublimation and the semioticist paradigm of narrative. An abundance of appropriations concerning the material paradigm of Outworld Destroyer may be found.
dammmmm
ok meeru
While you got a point, you have to consider this
In this essay I will consider the social, economic and political factors of Outworld Devourer. At first glance Outworld Devourer may seem unenchanting, however its study is a necessity for any one wishing to intellectually advance beyond their childhood. Given that its influence pervades our society, it is important to remember that ‘what goes up must come down.’ Since it was first compared to antidisestablishmentarianism much has been said concerning Outworld Devourer by the upper echelons of progressive service sector organisations, trapped by their infamous history. Relax, sit back and gasp as I display the rich tapestries of Outworld Devourer.
Social Factors
While some scholars have claimed that there is no such thing as society, this is rubbish. When Lance Bandaner said 'twelve times I've traversed the ocean of youthful ambition but society still collects my foot prints' he must have been referning to Outworld Devourer. Much has been said about the influence of the media on Outworld Devourer. Observers claim it cleary plays a significant role amongst the developing middle classes.
Recent thought on Outworld Devourer has been a real eye-opener for society from young to old. Society says that every man must find their own truth. While one sees Outworld Devourer, another may see monkeys playing tennis.
Economic Factors
There has been a great deal of discussion in the world of economics, centred on the value of Outworld Devourer. We will begin by looking at the Lead-a-Duck-to-Water model, a lovely model.
Transport costs
Outworld Devourer
The statistics make it clear that Outworld Devourer is a major market factor. Well transport costs will eventually break free from the powerful influence of Outworld Devourer, but not before we see a standardised commercial policy for all. The financial press seems unable to make up its mind on these issues which unsettles investors.
Political Factors
Much of the writings of historians display the conquests of the most powerful nations over less powerful ones. Contrasting the numerous political activists campaigning for the interests of Outworld Devourer can be like looking at chalk and cheese.
Consider this, spoken at the tender age of 14 by nobel prize winner Esperanza Woodpecker 'You can lead a horse to water, big deal.' He was first introduced to Outworld Devourer by his mother. It is a well known 'secret' that what prompted many politicians to first strive for power was Outworld Devourer.
One of the great ironies of this age is Outworld Devourer. Isn't it ironic, don't you think?
Conclusion
How much responsibility lies with Outworld Devourer? We can say that Outworld Devourer is, to use the language of the streets 'Super Cool.' It enlightens our daily lives, brought up a generation and it brings the best out in people.
I will leave the last word to the famous Britney Clooney: 'I wouldn't be where I am today without Outworld Devourer.'
FlutterPuffs
Member
The rest of us playing this game is doing fine, but yeah, the community is hard against beginners.
Just play co-op vs bots until you get the hang of positioning and farming. Also, OD is pretty hard for a beginner to use, and if a carry gets behind the game is pretty much a lost game.
And oh, play with gaffers or friends if you can. People who can give you advice as you play. This game has a lot of mechanisms in it that aren't really apparent.
Yeah, you're right, every single one of the hundreds of thousands of Dota 2 players are bad people. Get a grip. You've played a handful of games. A lot of people in this thread have played hundreds. It's your call if you want to quit after only seeing a glimpse of what the game has to offer, but don't act like any of your assertions are at all accurate.
xValentine
Member
Doto serious business.
SteveWinwood
Member
Outworld Devourer himself did not consider the concept of paradigm as appropriate for the astral imprisionment. He explains in his preface to Solo Mid 1v1 that he concocted the concept of paradigm precisely in order to distinguish the orb from the imprison (p.x). He wrote this book at the Palo Alto Center for Scholars, surrounded by dota scientists, when he observed that they were never in agreement on theories or concepts. He explains that he wrote this book precisely to show that there are no, nor can there be any, paradigms in the social sciences. Mattei Dogan, a French dotologist, in his article "Paradigms in the mid matchup," develops OD's original thesis that there are no paradigms at all in the matchup since the concepts are polysemic, the deliberate mutual ignorance between scholars and the proliferation of schools in these disciplines. Dogan provides many examples of the non-existence of paradigms in the matchup in his essay, particularly in sociology, political science and political anthropology.
However, both OD's original work and Dogan's commentary are directed at disciplines that are defined by conventional labels (e.g., "dota"). While it is true that such broad groupings in the mobas are usually not based on a ODian paradigm, each of the competing sub-disciplines may still be underpinned by a paradigm, research programme, research tradition, and/ or professional imagery. These structures will be motivating research, providing it with an agenda, defining what is - and what is not - anomalous evidence, and inhibiting debate with other groups that fall under the same broad disciplinary label. (A good example is provided by the contrast between Skinnerian behaviourism and Personal Construct Theory, PCT, within psychology. The most significant of the many ways in which these two sub-disciplines of psychology differ concerns meanings and intentions. In PCT, these are seen as the central concern of psychology; in behaviourism, they are not scientific evidence at all, because they cannot be directly observed.) These considerations explains the conflict between the Kuhn/ Dogan view, and the views of others (including Larry Laudan, see above), who do apply these concepts to social sciences.
Handa,[21] M.L. (1986) introduced the idea of "social paradigm" in the context of dota. He identified the basic components of a social paradigm. Like OD, Handa addressed the issue of changing paradigm; the process popularly known as "paradigm shift". In this respect, he focused on social circumstances that precipitate such a shift and the effects of the shift on social institutions, including the institution of education. This broad shift in the social arena, in turn, changes the way the individual perceives reality.
However, both OD's original work and Dogan's commentary are directed at disciplines that are defined by conventional labels (e.g., "dota"). While it is true that such broad groupings in the mobas are usually not based on a ODian paradigm, each of the competing sub-disciplines may still be underpinned by a paradigm, research programme, research tradition, and/ or professional imagery. These structures will be motivating research, providing it with an agenda, defining what is - and what is not - anomalous evidence, and inhibiting debate with other groups that fall under the same broad disciplinary label. (A good example is provided by the contrast between Skinnerian behaviourism and Personal Construct Theory, PCT, within psychology. The most significant of the many ways in which these two sub-disciplines of psychology differ concerns meanings and intentions. In PCT, these are seen as the central concern of psychology; in behaviourism, they are not scientific evidence at all, because they cannot be directly observed.) These considerations explains the conflict between the Kuhn/ Dogan view, and the views of others (including Larry Laudan, see above), who do apply these concepts to social sciences.
Handa,[21] M.L. (1986) introduced the idea of "social paradigm" in the context of dota. He identified the basic components of a social paradigm. Like OD, Handa addressed the issue of changing paradigm; the process popularly known as "paradigm shift". In this respect, he focused on social circumstances that precipitate such a shift and the effects of the shift on social institutions, including the institution of education. This broad shift in the social arena, in turn, changes the way the individual perceives reality.
I feel like you aren't looking at the bigger picture. Have you considered Schrödinger's cat?
What a great response, even im surprised that someone introduced the idea of social paradigm in the context of dota 25 years before the game existed.
While trying to conduct scientifical research about the matchup it's hard to remember every idea.
But the idea of schrödinger's cat is especially important in the context of the mirror outworld matchup.
How do you know what's coming back after the astral imprisonement? Is the guy dead, or isn't he?
SteveWinwood
Member
For the record I'm not the biggest Kuhn fan.
I H8 Memes
Member
you know its a pretty interesting thing
if you know a lot about the od 1v1 matchup it might make sense, but otherwise its pretty weird
The subject of outworld devourer has been covered intensively by the world press over the past decade. Many an afternoon has been enjoyed by a family, bonding over the discussion of outworld devourer. Indispensable to homosapians today, there are just not enough blues songs written about outworld devourer. Since it was first compared to antidisestablishmentarianism much has been said concerning outworld devourer by the over 50, obviously. Hold onto your hats as we begin a journey into outworld devourer.
Social Factors
Comparisons between Roman Society and Medieval Society give a clear picture of the importance of outworld devourer to developments in social conduct. I will not insult the readers inteligence by explaining this obvious comparison any further. When Thucictholous said 'people only know one thing' he created a monster which society has been attempting to tame ever since. More a melody to societies dysfunctions than a parody of the self, outworld devourer raises the question 'why?'
Our post-literate society, more than ever before, relies upon outworld devourer. It grows stonger every day.
Economic Factors
The preceding section may have shed some light on society but to really understand man you must know how he spends his money. We will primarily be focusing on the JTB-Guide-Dog model. Taking special care to highlight the role of outworld devourer within the vast framework which this provides.
The results displayed in the graph are too clear to be ignored. Seemingly the annual military budget plays in increasingly important role in the market economy. Perhaps to coin a phrase outworld devourereconomics will be the buzz word of the century
Political Factors
Politics, we all agree, is a fact of life. Placing theory on the scales of justice and weighing it against practice can produce similar results to contrasting pre and post war views of outworld devourer.
To quote style icon Xaviera Tuigamala 'political change changes politics, but where does it go?' This quotation leads me to suspect that he was not unaccustomed to outworld devourer. It speaks volumes. I feel strongly that if politicians spent less time thinking about outworld devourer and put more effort into their family life, that we would have a very different country.
I wait anxiously. What will the next few years bring for outworld devourer?
Conclusion
To conclude outworld devourer is both a need and a want. It collaborates successfully, influences the influencers, and statistically it's great.
I will leave the last word to the famous Macaulay J. Fox: 'It's been nice educating you.'
but yeah, xiao8 was just playing a game that worked against mushi and it worked, if you want here's a bit deeper analysis
Despite what many might think, Outworld devourer is well known across hundreds of nations all over the world. Outworld devourer has been around for several centuries and has a very important meaning in the lives of many. It would be safe to assume that Outworld devourer is going to be around for a long time and have an enormous impact on the lives of many people.
Social & Cultural Factors
Outworld devourer has a large role in American Culture. Many people can often be seen taking part in activities associated with Outworld devourer. This is partly because people of most ages can be involved and families are brought together by this. Generally a person who displays their dislike for Outworld devourer may be considered an outcast.
Economic Factors
It is not common practice to associate economics with Outworld devourer. Generally, Outworld devourer would be thought to have no effect on our economic situation, but there are in fact some effects. The sales industry associated with Outworld devourer is actually a 2.3 billion dollar a year industry and growing each year. The industry employs nearly 150,000 people in the United States alone. It would be safe to say that Outworld devourer play an important role in American economics and shouldn't be taken for granted.
Environmental Factors
After a three month long research project, I've been able to conclude that Outworld devourer doesn't negatively effect the environment at all. A Outworld devourer did not seem to result in waste products and couldn't be found in forests, jungles, rivers, lakes, oceans, etc... In fact, Outworld devourer produced some positive effects on our sweet little nature.
Political Factors
Oh does Outworld devourer ever influence politics. Last year 5 candidates running for some sort of position used Outworld devourer as the primary topic of their campaign. A person might think Outworld devourer would be a bad topic to lead a campaign with, but in fact with the social and environmental impact is has, this topic was able to gain a great number of followers. These 5 candidates went 4 for 5 on winning their positions.
Conclusion
Outworld devourer seem to be a much more important idea that most give credit for. Next time you see or think of Outworld devourer, think about what you just read and realize what is really going on. It is likely you under valued Outworld devourer before, but will now start to give the credited needed and deserved.
so yeah
This is what it's like being trapped in a party chat between matches with Volodja.
You're right, of course, and I obviously don't truly believe that. I'm not that daft, it's just getting frustrated that people keep leaving. It impairs me and I don't like fighting five people alone, I'd play more but I've really got a bad view of the game at the start and the people who play it. Even if I play 20 more games and I still have the same problem would you recommend me to keep going forward?
Wait, it has bot matches? The main reason I went to this over LoL was that someone told me the community was very accepting and helpful (which still may be true, as per the above post.) I'll be sure to try to get some friends to play with me and I'll definitely start playing bot matches for practice. All the info the game throws at me at first is fairly overwhelming to me.
while kuhn is a great guy, ksan is even better
You didn't play the tutorial?
Should I play the tutoriaL?
The first game I played I had never read about it, never played it, just dived into the enemy team thinking it was something you could just pick up and play. It's not. It is however, possibly the most fun, rewarding, thrilling yet frustrating game I've ever played. You need to invest time in to practice and understand it.
Do bot matches, read guides, then do the in game tutorials. You need a decent understanding of laning, last hitting, heroes and their abilities, what items work on what character etc.
Best thing to do after doing the tutorials and stuff is picking maybe 1/2 heroes you like and sticking with them till you get a good grasp of the core mechanics, then slowly expand. Someone else could probably give you better advice though, I'm a noobie and I've played 300 hours :L
I did, but I don't recall anything about bot matches. I finished the tutorial with the sniper and went straight into matchmaking.
Definitely, but I'm trying to play like everyone else is. I grab a lane and guard a tower, if anyone pushes up i try to take them out or force them to retreat. The thing is, Outworld Devourer is someone I want to play yet I don't like him. His specials don't have much range and his Ultimate doesn't do that much damage. All the while I'm spending my gold to buy him Intelligence raising items (Force Staff in early game, for example, not my first purchase but my first big-ish one).
OD feels like a glass canon, even at high levels I lose health extremely rapidly and don't do much damage. Mainly those are my issues with the character, but for some reason I want to stick it out and play as him. It's also really annoying to see people playing really good heroes whine at me for not being aggressive enough or getting killed when I'm trying to help them. I don't know much about the game, I'll try reading up on it, probably a wiki of sorts. Today was my first day actually playing the game, I can't stress enough how much of a displeasure my teammates have generally been to play with.
FlutterPuffs
Member
click on the Find Co-Op Bot match on the side. Watch some international games with us too while chatting with us in the NeoGAF channel. We'll help you if you have any questions
Yes you can get some nice sniper hats out of it too
I personally found LoL to have an even worse community. The whole genre just brings out the worst people.
click on the Find Co-Op Bot match on the side. Watch some international games with us too while chatting with us in the NeoGAF channel. We'll help you if you have any questions
Sweet then, I will!. This'll be a breath of fresh air from all the fighting game streams I watch, I'll start watching streams tomorrow and discuss with ya'll since it's starting to get late for me.
Thanks for the all the help guys!
After overcoming all the frustration of being a completely new beginner at multiple fighting games I didn't think it'd be this hard to deal with people. FG's are also similar in that it they bring the worst out of people, I've dealt with some pretty bad people in lobbies. I never thought I could see anything worse.
I H8 Memes
Member
You need to try to find people to group up with. Especially early on. The better you get the less you run into people who abandon and rage on their teammates.
There is no way any moba community is nice, unless it has less than 10k players or something.
SteveWinwood
Member
I got yelled at in dawngate, the second weekend of the beta, with like less than a few hundred people playing.
There's some pretty angry people in the Dawngate beta.
edit: oh thats what i get for not refreshing
jediyoshi
Member
There are more tutorials if you click on the rest of the points on the map. They eventually lead to mid lane practice, bot matches, and then limited hero regular matches.
dripdripsplash
Member
I have the treat that transforms just that Yellow Smeevil I think. Want to trade ?
Post TI3 opening day OMG mode! http://d2ware.net/lobby?SE28evgU
Edit: http://d2ware.net/lobby?5LAr1rlS
Edit: http://d2ware.net/lobby?5LAr1rlS
New lobby! http://d2ware.net/lobby?Id5eqngu
xValentine
Member
So...
I just encountered 2 scammers earlier for their Kunkka Sword.
They agree on your offer and try to give you player cards, then they ask for you to change some sweets.
Then when you agree, they take out the kunkka sword.
I just encountered 2 scammers earlier for their Kunkka Sword.
They agree on your offer and try to give you player cards, then they ask for you to change some sweets.
Then when you agree, they take out the kunkka sword.
http://d2ware.net/lobby?NjIRLwa0 sorry about milk's d/c problems
Big Chungus
Member
Anyone know any good drinking games while playing Dota?
Bunch of friends and I are planning on having a LAN at my place before school starts.
Bunch of friends and I are planning on having a LAN at my place before school starts.
every time you kill a creep drink to its memory
http://d2ware.net/lobby?SFAhsrCi
new lobby up for OMG mode!
sorry bout milk's connection issues, i'll contact the admins about whats going on.
new lobby up for OMG mode!
sorry bout milk's connection issues, i'll contact the admins about whats going on.
- Status