nial
Gold Member
For how much did the cheaper, $200 Lite model released 1.5 years into the console's lifecycle account for this?PS4 before the Switch 1 launch (NSW launch price: $300):
![]()
End result:
![]()
People have short memory.
Last edited:
For how much did the cheaper, $200 Lite model released 1.5 years into the console's lifecycle account for this?PS4 before the Switch 1 launch (NSW launch price: $300):
![]()
End result:
![]()
People have short memory.
We just have to, apparently prices have to go up by at least $100 each generation because… well… because… look Switch 2 did it and we need to justify it…yeah, I mean...if this is what 450 buys these days......what does how much does a console that we would consider truly next gen cost in a couple years, given the current infation and tarrif BS? we might be looking at 750 dollar consoles.
For how much did the cheaper, $200 Lite model released 1.5 years into the console's lifecycle account for this?
Lite model was released after 2 years and half from launch and represent a measly 16.7% of the total Switch sales worldwide as December 2024.For how much did the cheaper, $200 Lite model released 1.5 years into the console's lifecycle account for this?
Yuo, got that wrong, it was 2.5 years. Accounting for 25M unit sales makes a difference, really.Lite model was released after 2 years and half from launch and represent a measly 16.7% of the total Switch sales worldwide as December 2024.
I'm not saying it wasn't useful, I'm stating that the majority of Switch sales comes from the more expensive hybrid models (to the surprise of no one).Yuo, got that wrong, it was 2.5 years. Accounting for 25M unit sales makes a difference, really.
They should, I can't help but feel that they set this up themselves with Furukawa (in prior financial briefings/interviews) talking about how their customers expect affordability and that they'll take 'this' and 'that' into consideration when thinking about pricing.This amount of attempted "damage control" is a huge red flag coming from Nintendo. They are definitely feeling the heat.
They had to react, but they were clearly unprepared and they're so bad at it (always been). It's good that they're stuggling and hopefully the situation leads to taking real meassures to mitigate the situation instead of handling talking points.This amount of attempted "damage control" is a huge red flag coming from Nintendo. They are definitely feeling the heat.
While he is sorta in a position to only be a scapegoat, he could have been a Reggie and demanded the tech demo be a free pack in. He also does have major influence over pricing in the US market. Very likely that he had a part in the 80 dollar bullshit.It's so that we know he's very obviously the bad guy scapegoat
can Reggie come back from retirement?
Yea but most of the bigger games will be switch 2 exclusive going forward like Mario Kart world and Donkey Kong Bananza.That is arguable:
![]()
Metroid Prime 4: Beyond - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Rhythm Heaven (series) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Tomodachi Life sold close to 7M units on 3DS, btw.![]()
Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
and Nintendo is not a premium brand.What's Nintendo's fault if you're poor? Games are a luxury, not a basic necessity.
Edit: I mean this response in the "general" sense, not directly talking to you RobbThey should, I can't help but feel that they set this up themselves with Furukawa (in prior financial briefings/interviews) talking about how their customers expect affordability and that they'll take 'this' and 'that' into consideration when thinking about pricing.
Then we get a $450 system, $80 games, $80 controllers, and $10 freeware games..
![]()
I don't disagree, but I think it's more about the setting of people's expectations than anything else.That makes your launch total Between $500-$640 max if you need to budget. If you can't afford that fir a console LAUNCH then you have other, more significant financial priorities you need to be focusing on
Nintendo has always been premium, it never devalued its products, no matter how many years go by, they themselves tell you to your face, it's worth what it costs.and Nintendo is not a premium brand.
that's not what premium is.Nintendo has always been premium, it never devalued its products, no matter how many years go by, they themselves tell you to your face, it's worth what it costs.
What? The Nintendo brand is premium. You literally pay more for their products than if sold by generic XYZ company. You're confusing quality with brand reputation. Brand is definitely premium.that's not what premium is.
i think Nintendo has more cultural capital (like Disney or Lego). so they can price their product higher. but definitively their products and brand are not premium. (could be perceived as such tho)
What? The Nintendo brand is premium.
(could be perceived as such tho)
Cultural capitalYou literally pay more for their products than if sold by generic XYZ company.
Nintendo´s brand reputation is that of a family brand, kid-friendly (similar to what Disney used to be).You're confusing quality with brand reputation. Brand is definitely premium.
I think after the announcement of the next Xbox/Playstation console we will look back on Switch 2 as an extremely affordable launch.I don't disagree, but I think it's more about the setting of people's expectations than anything else.
If you talk about affordability and then come out with products that are priced higher than the status quo, it'll rub people the wrong way, no matter if they can actually afford it or not.
I can see that, maybe not extremely, but still. Everything is relative of course.I think after the announcement of the next Xbox/Playstation console we will look back on Switch 2 as an extremely affordable launch.
Good point and even today, if you want a great console you're looking @ $500 and up...or you can get a Series S or some other console where you'll never own your games.I can see that, maybe not extremely, but still. Everything is relative of course.
Outrage today will be based on today's comparative prices.
nintendo is competing against themselves in my opinion and i feel alot of casuals already got their nintedno fix with switchSony was competing in a red ocean against a serious competitor that launched a year before them.
Nintendo is swimming alone in a blue ocean today.
Plus, let's be real...$499/$599 in 2006 isn't the same as $499/$549 in 2025
Cultural capital
Nintendo´s brand reputation is that of a family brand, kid-friendly (similar to what Disney used to be).
Its quality?. The build quality of its hardware is not premium at all (joy-con drift?) and they sold a cardboard accessory for example.
Tbh I think the biggest competitor to the Switch 2 might be the Switch (1), well, until we know what Sony and MS are working on. Which seems like a pretty good spot for Nintendo to be in.Want to go the handheld route? You're not getting anything under $500 except a Steamdeck LCD...where you can't own your games physically, has a smaller screen, no HDR, only 60fpps and the modern AAA games can barely run on it.
So as you can see the options for a comparable option, under $500 aren't thar great. Switch 2, @$449 is still a great price, especially considering all of the tech under its portable hood.
Because Nintedo is not for enthusiasts. It's for parents who buy a cheaper console for their children and has Mario, Pokemon and kirby.even if the quality may not be there for enthusiasts who know better.
Because Nintedo is not for enthusiasts. It's for parents who buy a cheaper console for their children and has Mario, Pokemon and kirby.
remembers the 3DS debacle. What happened?
![]()
Nintendo apologizes to early adopters for 3DS price cut
Company's CEO says Nintendo was forced to drop the price of the 3DS in order to help the platform "gain popularity."www.cnet.com
![]()
Nintendo is not a brand that can compete in the premium market. If Nintendo offers a more expensive console than a PS5 (which is not even meant to be a premium product, but is perceived more premium than Nintendo´s) or the SW2´s price is in the same realm of a PC handhelds; They will be alienating their mass market audience: SW2 pricing is at odds with the market.
Either everything goes up or Nintendo folds.
When you buy a Nintendo game you can mostly be assured it's going to beI'm sorry, but you're wrong. People pay a premium for Nintendo because of their brand reputation of creating fun, accessible, and innovative products. There is a perceived economic value to their products based on this. Brand reputation is defined by public perception. I'm not saying that cultural capital isn't important to them, but brand reputation drives their premium price for their products even if the quality may not be there for enthusiasts who know better.
Yeah, thats what I said about a brand having a Premium perception (like Disney or Lego).You and I are talking about the word premium in two different contexts. You are talking about it from the physical asset perspective and I'm talking about it from the economic value of the Nintendo brand. I don't disagree with that point. However, the brand has a premium based on its perception in the marketplace. They can and do charge more for what they make because of the Nintendo brand name.
Why do you, as a consumer, argue for higher prices? You are on an enthusiasts board; I am willing to go out on a limb and guess that the majority of posters here can afford to buy a Switch 2.What's Nintendo's fault if you're poor? Games are a luxury, not a basic necessity.
Because Cyberpunk 2077, Elden Ring and The DuskBloods are the epitome of "Cartoonish looking"...A handheld with bunch of cartoonish looking games, with game prices 80$$$ yuh nuhhh
Lol, why even buy a console at this point.Work 3 jobs.
Problem solved!
The above is an example of the short memory people has that I cited before.Nintendo is not a brand that can compete in the premium market. If Nintendo offers a more expensive console than a PS5 (which is not even meant to be a premium product, but is perceived more premium than Nintendo´s) or the SW2´s price is in the same realm of a PC handhelds; They will be alienating their mass market audience: SW2 pricing is at odds with the market.
PS4 before the Switch 1 launch (NSW launch price: $300):
![]()
End result:
![]()
People have short memory.
PS3's $600 launch price in 2006 is equivalent to roughly $950 today.
The irony is that even at that price Sony was losing a lot of money per unit sold.
Krazy Ken.
Is this a serious statement? Games aren't priced based on the media they're printed on.... Digital games would be free.I would love to see the actual figures on what it costs them to make a game cartridge.
Even a house?Console prices in general freak people out, I don't love paying $400 for anything.
Its strange that you ignored WiiU which released a couple of months before PS4. And he is right, Nintendo themselves is actively avoiding direct confrontation with Sony and MS! Nintendo worst nightmare is Sony targeting hybrid market.The above is an example of the short memory people has that I cited before.
They are the best in milking their fanbase ... thats the objective truthThere are subjective truths and objective truths.
You THINK they are the best, I THINK they are not. Those are subjective truths/opinions.
Objective truths are:
Nintendo sells very obsolete consoles, at premium prices.
Nintendo games lack high production values in many fields, and they are sold at premium prices.
Nintendo Switch 2 games are in line with what Nintendo has been doing for decades now. And they want to charge even more for these obsolete products with low production values.
You like to pay for those products premium prices and you get your kicks out of them, that's all good, it's your money i couldn't care less. But saying that they are the best there is. That is nonsense, I won't accept that as a universal truth, because they clearly aren't. They sell a lot of games? you bet.