I... I can't believe he's claiming an actual game named Mirrors (by Edge). I thought it was a joke.SolidSnakex said:
Yup, delusional and paranoid: confirmed.The bias and trend toward defamation in reporting continues with Kotaku adding the fact of the Fuzzyeye's statement to their piece wrongly accusing Dr Langdell in"Trademark Troll Is At It Again" but failing to alter their defamatory article -- or its title -- despite proof they were wrong. And then in the reader comments to their article "Tim Langdell Defends Himself in Open Letter to Mobigame" Kotaku just removed most of the positive comments that were being made about Edge/Langdell, leaving almost solely only the ones critical of Edge/ Langdell.
The move to the sunnier climes of Los Angeles brought with it more than an alleged windfall from Commodore. From 1990, perhaps realising what a valuable and wide-ranging trademark it had at its disposal, The Edge's primary business shifted from publishing videogames to vigorously pursuing companies whose products it believed infringed 'The Edge' mark.
From Namco's PlayStation release Soul Edge (which had its name changed to Soul Blade for the West) to Sony's PlayStation Edge to the UK's own Edge magazine, Langdell confronted anyone who used his trademark in relation to videogames. In every case the message was clear: change the name of your product, pay us a licence fee or face a court hearing. Some paid the fee quietly. Others, faced with legal threats that they believed were dubious, turned the tables and instead took The Edge to court. No matter what the outcome of these cases, Langdell's energy in protecting his trademark never faltered, even if the trickle of games that bore the name had long since dried up.
Yoboman said:You can't patent names can you?
AniHawk said:Oh, here it is:
![]()
So yeah, it's been changed since then so it's not such a blatant ripoff.
no matter how unsavory you find his tone, his alleged use of shill forum accounts to add volume to his arguments, or the way in which he flaunts his licensee's products as his own. Langdell clearly believes he has done nothing wrong and that his energetic confrontations are something that trademark law requires him to do. Fail to protect your trademark and you lose it, he tells me repeatedly.
Keyser Soze said:Is there nothing we can to to help this, and make sure the people involved listen. A corporate email address or something to send complaints en masse to?
dalyr95 said:http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/the-edge-of-reason
Even EDGE magazine has to pay him royalties for the name
Jay Sosa said:I still can't get over the fact that you can copyright a word. I mean WTF?
dalyr95 said:
Oh wow, never noticed that. :lolRei_Toei said:Hey, am I the only one who can't unsee the arrow in the G from EDGE?
![]()
CultureClearance said:
They lost trademark on several Transformers names like Bumblebee and hound and for awhile were calling them in print Autobot Bumblebee and Autobot Hound and the same for some others. Just because you trademark the name of a property doesn't mean you own every use of the words used everywhere else.
If so, Tim Langdell should patent "asshole." After all, he should protect the name that is so rightfully his. :lolYoboman said:You can't patent names can you?
ItsInMyVeins said:Are they doing that now, though?
someguyinahat said:I always wondered about this sort of thing, in the same way that the pokemon named Electrode is trademarked. If they can hold on to that, maybe they can make a new pokemon named "Edge" and get in on all these shenanigans. Now there's a court battle I'd like to see.
AzureNightmareXE said:is it just me or does he look like an evil mastermind?
Orbitcube said:Also, if anyone's interested, apparently the results of the vote to remove Mr. Langdell from the Board of Directors of the IGDA is going to be announced this Saturday (great timing, the vote went for a month).
God knows how he got on the IGDA board in the first place.
Yeah, didn't read that until just then.BluWacky said:Didn't he resign a few weeks ago, thus rendering the whole thing moot at this point?
Degen said:I'd check Wikipedia to see who came first, but the game company isn't even there.
Oh, snap. They were first. I guess they win.Uncle said:
mrgone said:Lorenzo Lamas can defend my trademarks any day! (He's immortal! And good with a sword!)
Fimbulvetr said:"Masters of the Game Since 1979" :lol
Zeitgeister said:Doesn't that mean that the patent will be dismissed this year? (I thought the maximum term for a single -nonrenewed- patent was 20 years, so...).
You cannot prevent trademark filings of the same name or symbol, etc. in different industries. That's against the law.BluWacky said:It's not a patent. It's a trademark. And it's been renewed several times since 1979, hence the current situation.