Bumping this with the same headline is really only going to misinform people.
It's looking like Trump has Utah, unless turnout works against him. Which is a shame. Almost wish Clinton would encouraged her Utah supporters to vote for McMullin as a means to close the gap, but she's too close to taking it for herself for that to be viable.
Trump losing Utah to McMullin doesn't really hurt him especially bad. It will hurt his ego, but that's about all.
Imagine McMullin wins Utah.
If Trump has < 264 electoral votes, Trump losing Utah didn't cost him the election.
If Trump has >= 270 electoral votes, Trump wins anyway
If Trump ends up in the middle, where he has somewhere between 264 and 269 electoral votes, then McMullin's win will throw the election into the House. Seeing as how it's the House that the Republicans have on lockdown and their choices will be Trump and Clinton only, Trump will be elected President anyway.
Hillary's only interest in Utah was when she was seeing if she might be able to win the electoral votes by getting the rest of the state to split evenly between Trump and McMullin. If that's not possible, she doesn't really care if it's McMullin or Trump that wins.