Jay Sosa said:Played the demo, the design is ugly as hell. The red haired girls looks stunning though, may pick up a cheap copy just because of her. Is she a real actress or just some CGI model?
HixxSAFC said:
HixxSAFC said:'bad graphics'?
Quite easily one of the most beautiful games I've ever played..
Check out the amazing screenshots from Enslaved in that "post your ridiculously awesome downsampled videogame screenshots" thread.HixxSAFC said:'bad graphics'?
Quite easily one of the most beautiful games I've ever played..
HixxSAFC said:'bad graphics'?
Quite easily one of the most beautiful games I've ever played..
HixxSAFC said:Lindsey Shaw does her voice, looks very little like her though.
Jay Sosa said:Thanks, that's too bad.
Seriously...the receiver I have can't accept audio input from HDMI unfortunately ( I should have spent more money ). I planned on playing the game today, but now I'm contemplating taking it back for the 360 version instead.Always-honest said:so no 5.1 surround through toslink on the PS3 version. That is just... fucked up imo.
Oli said:Amazon orderers, did you get the code for the soundtrack yet?
Eurogamer said:In the final analysis, it's evident that both Xbox 360 and PS3 renditions of Enslaved have their own particular strengths, weaknesses and individual quirks. The implementation of the background streaming on PS3 clearly helps out a game like this: there are demonstrable advantages to the data streaming that are only partially matched on 360 when the game is installed on to the hard drive.
For its part, the Xbox 360 has its own plus points - generally higher frame-rates, lower levels of screen-tear, and a minor range of subtle graphical boosts. You also get Dolby Digital 5.1 as standard with the 360 version - oddly, the PS3 game only supports uncompressed LPCM 5.1 over the HDMI port, so no surround sound if you have your console attached to the amp with Toslink. Bizarre, frankly.
None of the disadvantages of either version are real game-breakers and overall either version is recommended, but if you own both consoles and have the choice of which version to buy, the Xbox 360 release is the one to get: a generally higher level of performance must surely take precedence over the occasional streaming problem.
derFeef said:@subversus
Yeah that was quite nice, even if if it was on the easy side. I am actually struggling more with the normal enemies. :lol
The Interrobanger said:Technically, the graphics are pretty horrible, I don't even see this as debatable. The art style is mostly decent though.
jonnybryce said:Oh, this thread continues to deliver.
I'm sad the game is over but don't feel like playing again right away. I need to find another enjoyable title like this - going from this to Black Ops for a while is a crime. Need more action/adventure.
beatbeat said:If the main character is as ugly as this one is,then no matter how awesome the rest of the package is,i won't buy.who wants to play as a bird/man/bum looking thing?...looks like he smells too...and not good.
Rated-Rsuperstar said:Ugh.. the trophywhere you have to save Trip from the rhino is so lame. Making you replay the whole chapter if you miss it is so infuriating. After missing it my second time, I ain't bothering with that again.
The Interrobanger said:Technically, the graphics are pretty horrible, I don't even see this as debatable. The art style is mostly decent though.
but its not debatable.V_Arnold said:You are mad.
You are insane.
You do not know the meaning of the word "horrible".
Pick one. Seriously.
subversus said:Castlevania?
DevelopmentArrested said:but its not debatable.
DevelopmentArrested said:but its not debatable.
SolidusDave said:Technically, yes.
jonnybryce said:Installing the demo as we speak! I don't like to play more than one single player game at a time, I'm weird like that, so I held off and am going to give it a shot now.
JordoftheDead said:I can't believe people are calling this game ugly. It has some low res textures here and there but it's a bloody great looking game at times.
I think I'm up to Capter 13 or so. Good game.
JordoftheDead said:I can't believe people are calling this game ugly. It has some low res textures here and there but it's a bloody great looking game at times.
I think I'm up to Capter 13 or so. Good game.
thetechkid said:Nope, I'm still wondering how they were/are supposed to deliver them.
8-10 hrsYagizY said:Any word on how long the game is?
Framerate isn't bad during the first six chapters. Just you wait, though, the second half of the game runs like dogshit. In fact, it basically ends up running similar to the PS3 demo and often much worse. Choppy framerates and constant tearing both become the norm. :\I have had very few framerate dorps during combat (up to chapter 6) actually and the pop-in also seems not quite that apparent that I feared it would be. I have it installed on my 360 so maybe that´s why? The only few times where the framerate really drops so that the camera chugs is during loading sections/reaching a new area.
beatbeat said:If the main character is as ugly as this one is,then no matter how awesome the rest of the package is,i won't buy.who wants to play as a bird/man/bum looking thing?...looks like he smells too...and not good.
dark10xdark10x said:Framerate isn't bad during the first six chapters. Just you wait, though, the second half of the game runs like dogshit. In fact, it basically ends up running similar to the PS3 demo and often much worse. Choppy framerates and constant tearing both become the norm. :\
In the demo, which at the moment is all I've played, I was kind of pulled-out of the experience because of it.Y2Kev said:I'm really impressed with what they do with the camera in this game. I like that a lot.
Y2Kev said:I'm really impressed with what they do with the camera in this game. I like that a lot.