Wafflecakes
Member
Its more than just this thread. Not going to go into it in here though.I don't get that from their posts. You're projecting something that's honestly not there.
Its more than just this thread. Not going to go into it in here though.I don't get that from their posts. You're projecting something that's honestly not there.
since we're all centering the white-guy-crying-racism's side of the story, lets hear from the actual students POV yall dont care about. Because clear none of yall even read past the lede
http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/2017/03/20/re-equity-inclusion-silence-and-fear-faculty-emails-reveal-controversy-over-race-and-diversity-at-evergreen/
So...why was he mad though? Seems like a case of white fragility but maybe someone more knowledgeable could explain it better.
I mean you brought it up.Its more than just this thread. Not going to go into it in here though.
White guy crying racism? Jesus you're disingenuous.
Weinstein took particular issue with one policy, put in place to encourage equity at Evergreen ”faculty voted to require official, yearly reflections on our individual progress relative to racial diversity." He appears to conflate this attempt to mend historical inequality and combat racism at Evergreen, with discrimination against white people, writing, ”It is hard to imagine a person of color being flagged by a conversion panel, or as an internal hiring candidate, due to their yearly reflections revealing cryptic bias, or insufficient progress with respect to race. But it is all too easy to imagine a white person (whatever that is taken to mean) being challenged on this basis." He continues that as a result of these and other diversity policies, ”We have now imposed on ourselves a de facto hierarchy based on skin color, and hooked it directly to mechanisms of hiring, promotion and dismissal–empowering some, and disempowering others."
I mean you brought it up.
Casting the professor's comments as "white-guy-crying-racism" makes me think that while you may have read his comments, you haven't processed them.since we're all centering the white-guy-crying-racism's side of the story, lets hear from the actual students POV yall dont care about. Because clear none of yall even read past the lede
http://www.cooperpointjournal.com/2017/03/20/re-equity-inclusion-silence-and-fear-faculty-emails-reveal-controversy-over-race-and-diversity-at-evergreen/
and you cant read, so where do we go from here?
I don't like the idea of putting the students in the cross hairs of the conservative, freeze peach, reverse racism is the real racism folks in retaliation thoughTelling people to leave campus was a terrible idea.
Casting the professor's comments as "white-guy-crying-racism" makes me think that while you may have read his comments, you haven't processed them.
He's Jewish actually, a group of people that have had to deal with their own forms of discrimination.Yes, that's white guy crying racism
I don't like the idea of putting the students in the cross hairs of the conservative, freeze peach, reverse racism is the real racism folks in retaliation though
So you didn't read or are choosing to ignore the part where students were actively looking for him, going to car to car, throughout campus.Sorry for not giving the benefit of the doubt to a white guy who thinks incorporating initiatives to improve Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in employee performance reviews is racism against white people. THEN following him to go on a bunch of right wing media platforms to cry about being a victim because students non violently organized against him and said some mean things in the process?
Yes, that's white guy crying racism
You left out the "threats of physical violence"Suing your employer for failing to protect you from "verbal hostility" sounds kinda snowflakey.
Going on a media outlet is a pretty shit reason to attack someone. I hate Fox as much as the next guy, but when the guy was ignored by the left wing media due to leftist blood-lust on the issue the guy really had no other choice if he wanted to get his side of the story out.
Off topic but What makes the new school an alternative campus lolIs this place even a real university? Just briefly reading about them makes them sound like like another "alternative college" like the new school in nyc
So you didn't read or are choosing to ignore the part where students were actively looking for him, going to car to car, throughout campus.
lots of white moderates/centrists on this site don't like me. It's very much a personal problem (for them) that exactly 0 of them have ever addressed me privately.
You left out the "threats of physical violence"
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of "everything wrong with The Left"One of the worst examples of the left eating it's own imaginable given the professors history with fighting for equality and being as progressive as they come. Not to mention an evolutionary biology teacher so he was actually giving out high quality scientific education. If you want one of the best case studies to look at its of Bret Weinstein. Not surprised the College settled.
Some activist students in America are absolutely fucking bonkers. Like genuinely a threat, if not the most unequiped, bratish, hostile and aggressive young kids you could ever find. Some of the videos of these students on YouTube are downright embarrassing to the human race that these young adults would refer to themselves as intellectuals in higher education.
That's what literally happened here.I think it can be said that this could be considered a bad idea without having to constantly worry about the alt-right getting a new scapegoat.
Trust me when I say it's not exclusive to white people. I've seen you're previous posts in other threads and it's always you being the most judgemental or reactionary. It's perfectly alright to criticize him for going on Fox News, but ignoring the context and following events tells me you tend to ignore information that opposes your personal narrative.
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of everything wrong with The Left
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of everything wrong with The Left
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of "everything wrong with The Left"
That's what literally happened here.
Was responding to the post I quoted which mentioned nothing of "larger reaction to the situation"It's not just the kids but also the larger reaction to the situation.
But kids are fucking dumb. The good thing is they're still in school and still young. They can learn from their actions before they get out into the real world and improve their politics and strategies a bit. I think pointing at a bunch of kids as T H E problem with The Left is just fucking silly to me. I'm sorryNot at all. The youth are the future generations growing up to "run" countries. I said this is a good case study of the left eating it's own and it is. I didn't say it was everything wrong with the left.
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of "everything wrong with The Left™"
Was responding to the post I quoted which mentioned nothing of "larger reaction to the situation"
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of "everything wrong with The Left™"
That's what literally happened here.
But they are kids. They're still learning and for the most part they probably learning about politics through the politics of their own campuses which are their communities.Some of these people are in their 20s. Stop calling them "kids". THEY CAN VOTE.
Some of these people are in their 20s. Stop calling them "kids". THEY CAN VOTE.
Was responding to the post I quoted which mentioned nothing of "larger reaction to the situation"
But kids are fucking dumb. The good thing is they're still in school and still young. They can learn from their actions before they get out into the real world and improve their politics and strategies a bit. I think pointing at a bunch of kids as T H E problem with The Left is just fucking silly to me. I'm sorry
It's weird using a buncha kids still in school as an example of "everything wrong with The Left™"
But they are kids. They're still learning and for the most part they probably learning about politics through the politics of their own campuses which are their communities.
My problem is that you excuse threats against him as not being an issue, because according to you he was never in danger since a black person wouldn't risk their educational prospects over this.Yes, Me. The black man decrying thinly veiled dog whistling white centrism, is part of the problem of racism. Not the guy who went on a whole right wing media tour to paint himself as the victim of a "blood lust" filled crusade by left wing college students for sympathy with a white audience.
I ain't ask to be on this damn ship anyway.
You could say this about most people in their 40s. Not kids.But they are kids. They're still learning and for the most part they probably learning about politics through the politics of their own campuses which are their communities.
The fact that our society has extended childhood into the late teenage years doesn't change their legal status. That's my point. Are our young people today increasingly maladapted to adult life and lacking the emotional sophistication necessary for the world outside of education? As a teacher, I say "god damn it, yes".They behave like kids. It's the height of temper tantrums and throwing toys out of the pram at the mere sight of any sort of debate, conflict or situation that might require a civil conversation. The aggression, demands, threats and everything on display that's caught on tape are the kinds of footage you'll hope they'll rewatch one day and think "maybe I was out of line there". Then again some "kids" never grow up.
Colleges and Universities are supposed to be breeding grounds for intellectual stimulation, debate, challenges and for you and your world views to be put under test. It's no wonder the right get so much damn mileage out of education with some of what's caught on camera or described in modern education.
They have responsibilities and are going to have to be responsible for their actions. Sure. Not arguing otherwise. I'm just saying it's silly to hold people, kids essentially, who are still living on college campuses and kinda new to politics and adulthood in general as what's holding The Left Back from achieving glory or whatever. That's nonsense man.They're not kids. They're adults. They can vote, they can get media coverage, they can influence and steer the discussion across the country (for better or worse), they can be violent and they can make their campuses look like war zones if things get out of hand.
My problem is that you excuse threats against him as not being an issue, because according to you he was never in danger since a black person wouldn't risk their educational prospects over this.
First off, this isn't "punching a Nazi". It's just some guy who didn't agree with what was happening. Not everything is a threat against the livelihood of black people and needs to be responded to as such (ie. threatening him is outrageous).
Second, you for some reason assume that it is black people threatening him. Why?
Lastly, drawing these racial concessions of "well clearly he was safe because a black person _______" is beyond absurd. You are drawing arbitrary lines so that no matter what happens, the argument will fall in your favour.
I have no issues with you hating this guy, or whatever, but changing the rules and context as you go is extremist nonsense. Using this logic we can condemn and/or justify anything we want, and it's detrimental to people who are actually trying to do good, imo.
They have responsibilities and are going to have to be responsible for their actions. Sure. Not arguing otherwise. I'm just saying it's silly to hold people, kids essentially, who are still living on college campuses and kinda new to politics and adulthood in general as what's holding The Left Back from achieving glory or whatever. That's nonsense man.
Stupid college kids aren't holding the left back, but it doesn't help when people prop them up or excuse their actions.They have responsibilities and are going to have to be responsible for their actions. Sure. Not arguing otherwise. I'm just saying it's silly to hold people, kids essentially, who are still living on college campuses and kinda new to politics and adulthood in general as what's holding The Left Back from achieving glory or whatever. That's nonsense man.
You left out the "threats of physical violence"
You could say this about most people in their 40s. Not kids.
The fact that our society has extended childhood into the late teenage years doesn't change their legal status. That's my point. Are our young people today increasingly maladapted to adult life and lacking the emotional sophistication necessary for the world outside of education? As a teacher, I say "god damn it, yes".
I agree about everything you say otherwise, though. At a previous high school I taught at, a number of my students planned on going to a "Christian University" so that they could be in a familiar culture. To those I knew well enough that I felt like they wouldn't cry to their parents about oppression, I would tell them what a mistake that is. The point of higher education is to challenge yourself intellectually and expand your mind about different viewpoints. To go to a school with the intention of keeping your beliefs intact is missing the point entirely. I wish we wouldn't even dignify such schools as being universities in this day and age.
The professor made a bad decision putting the students in the crosshairs of the conservative types.It was offered as an example of the left eating its own. The teacher is unquestionably very liberal and the students threatening him were also unquestionably on the left.
Yeah exactlyStupid college kids aren't holding the left back, but it doesn't help when people prop them up or excuse their actions.
If someone is talking about a "Christian" college, they mean an Evangelical school. (Just like w/ nearly every other usage of "Christian" where you could otherwise specify a denomination.)You shouldn't paint with such a broad brush.
There's nothing wrong with the vast majority of Christian colleges. Notre Dame is better than 99% of universities in the country.
Most Christian universities aren't propaganda factories like Liberty.
I don't see the ironyThe article says both. I focused on the ironic part.
The professor made a bad decision putting the students in the crosshairs of the conservative types.
Yeah exactly