You could say this about most people in their 40s. Not kids.
The fact that our society has extended childhood into the late teenage years doesn't change their legal status. That's my point. Are our young people today increasingly maladapted to adult life and lacking the emotional sophistication necessary for the world outside of education? As a teacher, I say "god damn it, yes".
I agree about everything you say otherwise, though. At a previous high school I taught at, a number of my students planned on going to a "Christian University" so that they could be in a familiar culture. To those I knew well enough that I felt like they wouldn't cry to their parents about oppression, I would tell them what a mistake that is. The point of higher education is to challenge yourself intellectually and expand your mind about different viewpoints. To go to a school with the intention of keeping your beliefs intact is missing the point entirely. I wish we wouldn't even dignify such schools as being universities in this day and age.
It doesn't really matter where you go if you can get a good qualification in something you like which is useful in life. Unless you were born into wealth, then study whatever you want I guess. Most people do need to keep an eye somewhat on a career path that will earn an okay salary. I think some of the brattyist and most aggressive students are probably from wealthy privileged backgrounds. Probably spoilt or have never had a day in their life where they didn't get something going their way. That's anecdotal, but I bet it's the case for some of them.
College or Uni isn't your home, it's a stop gap on the real road for life. It's to get an education, learn a bit about yourself and move on within a few years. Yeah, I get it being a community for a short amount of time, but students should realise it's a momentary stop in their lives, and for most it's primarily to get an education/qualification of some sorts. Not to go around staging a coup to take over a campus.
I should add I'm not really in favour of faith schools myself, I'm just saying above no matter where you go if your heads screwed on correctly you can work and learn and improve yourself.
What should he have done instead?
When your point of argument in this topic is being more concerned about who the professor spoke to than what actually happened it goes to show you care more about the "optics". Bret explained many times who was leaning out to him and who wasn't. No surprise the right was, to bash the left, but when you're wanting your side of the story heard you'll speak out to someone willing to give you a platform.
That plus people on the left get hyper defensive about situations that might make others on the left look bad. Tough. These students were out of order and shouldn't have others on the left defending them. The faculty and Dean completely failed to handle the situation as well, which is what the lawsuit is largely based on. They failed to protect the safety of Bret and his wife.
Edit: 2+ hours on Rogan if anyone wanted to hear about this as it happened (taped a few months ago) and judge Bret for yourself. The day of absence is explained right from the start
https://youtu.be/xq4Y87idawk