TLZ
Banned
But Nintendo never left the dedicated home console market. That's why Kerotan argument holds no water.
From Wii U Nintendo went directly to the Switch, that can be used exclusively as a home console. That's the beauty of its hybrid nature. You don't need to chase the high end graphics to be a home console. as the Switch and the Wii pretty much proved it.
The videogame industry is in constant evolution, and the past concepts that we have, that a home console needs to chase high end graphics, and that console need to have "Four legs instead of three always, unless its not the console with which I grew up for the last 30 years" is outdated.
Switch is both a home console and a portable console. That's why its a hybrid console.
And regardless o9f what they were, even if the PS5 was exclusively a VR machine, it would still compete directly against Nintendo, as both of them are videogame products, that demand people to choose one or the other(If they don't have enough money to afford both). Any argument that preaches that Sony or MS doesn't compete directly with Nintendo is bollocks. Even Phil admited as much in that interview for Kinda Funny.
You know what I mean by dedicated home console though. Non hybrid. Stationary. Basically every Nintendo home console pre Switch. What we have now is a hybrid. A departure from their home only consoles. This works for them very well as we can see.There's the PC market, mobile market and dedicated video game console market. Wii U, PS4, Switch and PS5 are all part of the latter, which is what Famitsu tracks.
The PS2 and GameCube were both part of the dedicated console market even though one plays DVDs and the other doesn't. A platform having additional functionality to a competitor doesnt prevent it competing.
Nintendo had a true attempt to challenge Playstation with the Wii U, but got the strategy wrong and completely failed. Then they had a another true attempt with the Switch and did a lot better.
The N64, GameCube and Wii were all true attempts as well.
They use different strategies sure, but that doesn't mean they don't compete.
The Wii and PS3 had different power levels and strategies, but still competed. Same with the PS2 and GameCube or PS1 and Sega Saturn.
As you said, the market sees value in the Switch's flexibility and functionality. That functionality does not prevent Switch from being a dedicated video game console.
I do agree about they're all competing in the same space though, regardless what they are. All are gaming systems competing for your time. Which one entices you the most to spend your limited valuable time on.