Falchion
Member
Can you kill someone in Primal and then boot up FC4 and dig up their bones!?
That would be such an insanely fun meta game I would buy Primal just for it.
Can you kill someone in Primal and then boot up FC4 and dig up their bones!?
........im like laughing because I have no idea what you are talking about anymore.
....I don't know why Cross felt the urge to comment on my post that literally was laughing about how ubisoft can be lazy too and had nothing to do about any type of critique on how good or bad the game is and if the area is the same as far cry 4 and now here you are trying to what? Call me out for a shitpost? Because I said ubisoft can be lazy too... For a height map. Lol!!
I don't even know why I entertained this lol!
I swear some people think game development is just dragging and dropping stuff from one place to another.
Proper, deep rooted ignorance.
How is Primal compared to FC4? I have played neither but Primal looks like it would be fun to try.
Are you blind or just being ignorant?
This is a small section of the map and there are way more differences than I can point out with MS Paint. This also doesn't show you how completely different the map feels from the ground.
![]()
How is Primal compared to FC4? I have played neither but Primal looks like it would be fun to try.
Ubsisoft earned their rep. Now they have to change that perception.
You're either going to think the game is boring, because it's just Far Cry 4 with a shitty melee combat system, or you'll fall in love with the unique setting.There's generally a positive vibe toward it in the OT, but I would say it's definitely the worst FC since 2, including Blood Dragon.
How is Primal compared to FC4? I have played neither but Primal looks like it would be fun to try.
Now imagine if it wasn't Ubisoft or an exclusive, we'd then be saying how genius it is.
I mean, both Syndicate and Primal have been solid entires in their respective franchises. And The Division's categorically not my shit but people seem to have liked the betas a lot. Same deal with Rainbow Six.Ubsisoft earned their rep. Now they have to change that perception.
I mean, both Syndicate and Primal have been solid entires in their respective franchises. And The Division's categorically not my shit but people seem to have liked the betas a lot. Same deal with Rainbow Six.
People's opinion of Ubisoft has moved on from being about the quality of their games, they just straight up hate the company. Not saying they didn't make their bed, but now it's reached a point where fair discussion of a Ubisoft game on its own merits has become impossible on the good ol' World Wide Web.
Wondering if you all who dont care about it would react the same if Dark Souls 3 was having the same layouts of Bloodborne...
I cant still beleive it, whats next, same layout of map in a futuristic environment?
Im on the side who just dont like it. Lazy effort to cash in quicker.
I would literally say the same thing, as in:shocking news, game developers reuse assets for a sequel.Wondering if you all who dont care about it would react the same if Dark Souls 3 was having the same layouts of Bloodborne...
I cant still beleive it, whats next, same layout of map in a futuristic environment?
Im on the side who just dont like it. Lazy effort to cash in quicker.
They did the same thing with Blood Dragon and 3 so... heh.
How is Primal compared to FC4? I have played neither but Primal looks like it would be fun to try.
didn't Saint's Row 2 reuse the map from Saint's Row?
Far Cry 4 was fun even though it took me a bit to get into. I had only played 1 & 2 before it so I can't say how it compares to 3 and Blood Dragon. But it's definitely better than the first two. Primal is much more enjoyable to me than 4. The whole craft system, taming pets, etc. It's just awesome.How is Primal compared to FC4? I have played neither but Primal looks like it would be fun to try.
I plat'd both FC4 and Primal. Honestly I think anyone who plays more than one Far Cry every 3 years is crazy. I really enjoyed FC4, but I hadn't played FC3 or Blood Dragon. I didn't like Primal at all, it was 3-4 hours of fun and then 15 hours of what felt like a chore.
Wondering if you all who dont care about it would react the same if Dark Souls 3 was having the same layouts of Bloodborne...
I cant still beleive it, whats next, same layout of map in a futuristic environment?
Im on the side who just dont like it. Lazy effort to cash in quicker.
I plat'd both FC4 and Primal. [...]. I didn't like Primal at all, it was 3-4 hours of fun and then 15 hours of what felt like a chore.
It was pretty bold of them to release DLC as a full retail release.
Rinさとり;197554023 said:The game has 20 dollars worth of content stretched to seem like a 60 dollar game.
You're either going to think the game is boring, because it's just Far Cry 4 with a shitty melee combat system, or you'll fall in love with the unique setting.
If you're the kind of person who thinks the Far Cry games have "shitty gunplay", you'll probably like Primal a lot more.
How is it $20 worth of content?
Smart is buying games I know I have a good chance of enjoying, regardless of how they were made. Bought Farcryrimal at full price and loved every minute of it. Worth every penny.
someone has really bought this game at full price? Oh boy.
someone has really bought this game at full price? Oh boy.
someone has really bought this game at full price? Oh boy.
Well thats you. I got maybe 5 hours into FC4 and stopped and traded it in. It felt like it was barely play tested, a lot of jank across the board. Thats why im apprehensive to go in full price for this, as cool as this game looks. Ill wait a little.
No but 3 and 4 re-used the same layouts.
Smart + Lazy = Efficient
didn't Saint's Row 2 reuse the map from Saint's Row?