serenewarfare
Banned
I wonder which Rockstar studio will work on Max Payne 4. Rockstar Vancouver did Max Payne 3 and that studio got merged with Rockstar Toronto. Maybe Toronto will take up the reins?
there is no bigger sign of a developer being marks of themselves than unskippable cutscenes
I wonder what Rockstar studio will work on Max Payne 4. Rockstar Vancouver did Max Payne 3 and that studio got merged with Rockstar Toronto. Maybe Toronto will take up the reins?
I remember it selling less than they thought it would. Max is probably dead for a long time. I don't even think Rockstar are going to make linear games anymore. Bully 2, Red Dead, another GTA, another LA Noire(with Rockstar developing instead of Bondi) all seem more likely than another Max Payne.
the art is in how fast i can manage to press the button to skip over your terrible cutscenesWhy would anyone skip cutscenes? You're watching art unfold.
I remember it selling less than they thought it would. Max is probably dead for a long time. I don't even think Rockstar are going to make linear games anymore. Bully 2, Red Dead, another GTA, another LA Noire(with Rockstar developing instead of Bondi) all seem more likely than another Max Payne.
The cut scenes were also straight up rip offs of the Tony Scott style in Man on Fire, it was so blatant.The unskippable cutscenes made me stop playing Max Payne 3 a lot faster than I would have otherwise.
Tweet comments: "Can you do porn! Raw Anal on cam!!"
At least we got some new gifs.I think you are in the wrong thread ev0.
At least we got some new gifs.
There's just something sexy about a woman with food in her mouth.the kpop crowd is OBSESSED with girl-eating-food gifs, I just don't get it
And they are much better to look at than the other eating gifs used around here.
I wonder which Rockstar studio will work on Max Payne 4. Rockstar Vancouver did Max Payne 3 and that studio got merged with Rockstar Toronto. Maybe Toronto will take up the reins?
Kaitlyn might be too brolic for me at this point, I can't decide.
That match where Phil Brooks took on Paul Levesque.
That match where Phil Brooks took on Paul Levesque.
I'm holding out hope for Vice Noire which is LA Noire but with some more car chases and fights and set in the 80s. Based heavily around Miami Vice.
#blameBraun
Vince kept her unhappy and thick.
I mean we were JUST talking about Max Payne 3.I don't see another Noire game. At least not for a while. Bondi did a majority of the work on LA, Rockstar just published. It wasn't even Rockstar's engine. It was completely proprietary.
I mean we were JUST talking about Max Payne 3.
I don't see another Noire game. At least not for a while. Bondi did a majority of the work on LA, Rockstar just published. It wasn't even Rockstar's engine. It was completely proprietary. And the entire development process was complete hell. And they (Bondi) are allegedly still working on Whore of the Orient, which will almost assuredly never come out at this point.
lol holy shit how did that happen.
Anyways, hi wrasslegaf you guys are hilarious (in a good way)
lol holy shit how did that happen.
Anyways, hi wrasslegaf you guys are hilarious (in a good way)
At least we have a good rep
lol holy shit how did that happen.
Anyways, hi wrasslegaf you guys are hilarious (in a good way)
I can see them starting from scratch without Team Bondi (considering they presumably own the IP), without the gimmicky face capture bullshit. Maybe then the PC version can run above 30FPS.
I've got nothing to do with that guy! heh
apology gif![]()
Rockstar does own the IP. I think taking away the face capture is taking away a big reason why LA Noire sold as well as it did. It was a novelty. Yeah, the game was good, but the facial capture stuff got a lot of people in the door. I don't think the franchise has much value, but I think a game with similar ideas might work if Rockstar builds it from the ground up. But then it won't be a sequel to LA Noire. It'll be its own thing.
I am firmly of the opinion that the reason that game sold as well as it did was because there was a Rockstar logo on the box. YMMV, but I was working games retail at the time, and you'd be amazed how many people asked if 'that new GTA' was out.
Everything about that feud was perfectly booked to build on Punk's momentum. Remember that Raw where everyone walked out on the company and you had the fans in an empty arena with no commentators? Why can't we get such masterful storytelling like that anymore?Oh.....
![]()
lol holy shit how did that happen.
Anyways, hi wrasslegaf you guys are hilarious (in a good way)
I am firmly of the opinion that the reason that game sold as well as it did was because there was a Rockstar logo on the box. YMMV, but I was working games retail at the time, and you'd be amazed how many people asked if 'that new GTA' was out.
Rockstar does own the IP. I think taking away the face capture is taking away a big reason why LA Noire sold as well as it did. It was a novelty. Yeah, the game was good, but the facial capture stuff got a lot of people in the door. I don't think the franchise has much value, but I think a game with similar ideas might work if Rockstar builds it from the ground up. But then it won't be a sequel to LA Noire. It'll be its own thing.
Everything about that feud was perfectly booked to build on Punk's momentum. Remember that Raw where everyone walked out on the company and you had the fans in an empty arena with no commentators? Why can't we get such masterful storytelling like that anymore?
Oh.....
![]()