More likely than not, Kennedy would be on the right side of this case even with the 9th judge. Garland definitely wouldn't have overturned it. He was nowhere near a bad judge.
This isn't on the merits though. Just on the stay.
The case will work its way through the court system on the merits, and by then it'll be a 9-person court, but my guess is there probably aren't 5 votes to say that this is a constitutional EO.
Yep.
If someone like Romney implemented this it would have stood. Trump and his cohorts own stupid remarks sunk it.
Would Roberts even side with Trump here? I get why elected Republicans bow to Trump but Roberts isn't ready to hand over the government to a loose cannon Executive branch.
Trump folks are triggered as FUCK on twitter right now lmao.
More likely than not, Kennedy would be on the right side of this case even with the 9th judge. Garland definitely wouldn't have overturned it. He was nowhere near a bad judge.
You assume Gorsuch would rule in favor of Trump.
Yessss.Trump folks are triggered as FUCK on twitter right now lmao.
Even as a conservative I knew that was going to happen, it was poorly written, with more holes then Swiss cheese. Here's a tip have some fucking evidence that terrorists were actually coming in. Or maybe have a viable plan to screen people before closing the gate. It's like a child having a tantrum.
Would Roberts even side with Trump here? I get why elected Republicans bow to Trump but Roberts isn't ready to hand over the government to a loose cannon Executive branch.
Mike HuckabeeWhere can I get some of these juicy tears?
Trump folks are triggered as FUCK on twitter right now lmao.
Mike Huckabee
9th Circuit spends 3 days looking for copy of Constitution, can't find one anywhere in CA, and rules on immigration anyway
https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/829831166895198208Where can I get some of these juicy tears?
Well yeah, he did give him a lifetime job.
Well yeah, he did give him a lifetime job.
Exactly.
When Obama did it, he had evidence and a means to check people coming in from Iraq. (comparing fingerprint from IED devices to incomming refugees)
Trump simply wants to ban people based solely on their religion. He has no grounds, no evidence, and no means to properly filter out terrorists from non-terrorists.
He's just an asshole.
Would Roberts even side with Trump here? I get why elected Republicans bow to Trump but Roberts isn't ready to hand over the government to a loose cannon Executive branch.
Trump folks are triggered as FUCK on twitter right now lmao.
Federal appeals court like:
Yare Yare Daze.
I'm glad somebody has the guts to call Trump out on his BS.