Two player lobbies + no spectating is just a slap in the face.
It's a damn shame because I personally really enjoy the flow and feel of SFV. I enjoy playing it quite a bit.
But reviewers definitely need to pop off against the product because it's unacceptable in today's market. This wouldn't be an issue if this was like a F2P product or even $20 like Killer Instinct.. but at $60 you need to put out more stuff on release than that. If reviewers can dock points off of Star Wars Battlefront (and I can tell you many of them have very strong feelings for Star Wars plus bias) then they can definitely got to town on SFV.
Two player lobbies gonna set the correct precedent for online sets in SFV before they patch in the 8 player lobbies.
Fuck large lobbies and fuck waiting!
That's a silly argument when lobbies can be set to the player amount. You are not forced to run the full 8 man lobbies.Two player lobbies gonna set the correct precedent for online sets in SFV before they patch in the 8 player lobbies.
Fuck large lobbies and fuck waiting!
Yeah man, god forbid people have principles and standards, and not just lap up whatever new product a company is hustling.lol principles
Is that Hana from prison school?
Yeah man, god forbid people have principles and standards.
No but people need to be coerced
This is where ZTS and/or Marz will come and tell you that you are a scrub because you hate waiting because you aren't good enough to stay on top of the Lobby.No but people need to be coerced into the superior way of playing online, too many SF4 lobbies were 3-4 players, hopefully it sticks well after they add in higher player count lobbies.
mine too dawg
Two player lobbies + no spectating is just a slap in the face.
This is where ZTS and/or Marz will come and tell you that you are a scrub because you hate waiting because you aren't good enough to stay on top of the Lobby.
Or something.
This is where ZTS and/or Marz will come and tell you that you are a scrub because you hate waiting because you aren't good enough to stay on top of the Lobby.
Or something.
I wish they made it so you could fight other people in the lobby, instead of king of the hill. But sounds like it might be SF4 style lobbies...No but people need to be coerced into the superior way of playing online, too many SF4 lobbies were 3-4 players, hopefully it sticks well after they add in higher player count lobbies.
I wish they made it so you could fight other people in the lobby, instead of king of the hill. But sounds like it might be SF4 style lobbies...
You got a game earlier than expected with all the core features that make it a competitive game, and a guarantee that they'll continue to add bells and whistles.
Eh... better than being a company apologist these days.Nah, gamers aren't entitled at all.
Basically, at least Capcom seems to be somewhat listening now instead of fingers in their ears era (Inafune).Eh... better than being a company apologist these days.
Something something Be Outraged quieter.Eh... better than being a company apologist these days.
Why does it have to be one or the other?Eh... better than being a company apologist these days.
|OT3| & Knuckles
I feel bad for mike ross. No wonder hes been looking rough. The man went through hell. Duration 2:28:03 Look at those kills. HOW. HOW DO YOU STILL LOSE. TECHIESMANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN LOOOOL. High skill bracket. With those deaths and kills? Ya, okay.
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2032281895
You know where you are at man?Why does it have to be one or the other?
You got a game earlier than expected with all the core features that make it a competitive game, and a guarantee that they'll continue to add bells and whistles.
"Slap in the face"
Nah, gamers aren't entitled at all.
Was kinda hoping you'd tell me I'm in the jungleYou know where you are at man?
This is GAF. We only deals in extremes and absolutes.
Like I said before I don't think too many people seem hype for SFV outside the usual suspects. MKX is the mainstream fighter. You're going to release a fighter with the bare minimum at launch when competition is going all out.
Eh... better than being a company apologist these days.
NRS was smart to test out their new netcode on a game that has already been out for a while.
it's like, nah, they wouldn't be doing that shit if they weren't gonna use this new rollback netcode for Injustice 2/whateverthefuck.
the greatest masterpiece of our times aka FGHQ OT3 is complete. Should I bother waiting for 20k to post it up?
Your standards are incredibly low if you think it's okay to ship a bare bone fighting game product when other companies have consistently put out a product with better value. It's okay to criticize a game man. If we don't criticize a company/product, it will never get better. It's 2016, and we aren't even getting the bare minimum of standards that should be in any fighting game at launch.
I understand the model they are going for, but $60, and minimum effort up front is pathetic. You can call me entitled all I want because I have expectations of what should be in a fighter in 2016.
SFV will be low 60s on metacritic
where's the sf5 ot?
K Sabot has never done anything that I would deem scrubby. Please stop putting words in my mouth.This is where ZTS and/or Marz will come and tell you that you are a scrub because you hate waiting because you aren't good enough to stay on top of the Lobby.
Or something.
Joke --->K Sabot has never done anything that I would deem scrubby. Please stop putting words in my mouth.
it's more like they need to take attention away from sf5.
NRS was so smart they decided to give the platform with the largest install base the middle finger.