• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Fitness |OT3| BroScience, Protein Dysentery, XXL Calf Implants, and Squat Rack Hogs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Redford

aka Cabbie
Cool, didn't know there was a lifting thread.

I'm so happy I was able to deadlift and squat 1plate for the first time yesterday.
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
LOL, sambas better be okay cause I ain't buyin new shoes.
3AQmK.gif
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
I found a neat little chart on HIT training.


Yeah, but you do HIT for a much shorter amount of time. For overall calories burned, regular cardio stuff is better. If the amount of calories burned total is the only variable you care about, do low intensity cardio shizz.
 

Mully

Member
Yeah, but you do HIT for a much shorter amount of time. For overall calories burned, regular cardio stuff is better. If the amount of calories burned total is the only variable you care about, do low intensity cardio shizz.

For fifteen minutes of HIT you burn an average of 126 Fat calories.

For thirty minutes of jogging you burn an average of 189 Fat calories.

You must also remember that HIT training is also exercising your cardiovascular system better than a jog.
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
For fifteen minutes of HIT you burn an average of 126 Fat calories.

For thirty minutes of jogging you burn an average of 189 Fat calories.

You must also remember that HIT training is also exercising your cardiovascular system better than a jog.

How are you getting the calorie figures? I've always heard that it was close to 100 calories per mile for the average person. 30 minutes of jogging sounds like about 3 miles.
 

Mully

Member
How are you getting the calorie figures? I've always heard that it was close to 100 calories per mile for the average person. 30 minutes of jogging sounds like about 3 miles.

I multiplied the average fat calories burned from each activity by the minutes I allocated for each one.
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
I multiplied the average fat calories burned from each activity by the minutes I allocated for each one.

Well, I guess it depends on how low intensity the training is, but if you jog about 10 minutes per miles you're probably going to burn more calories than that unless you weigh nothing.

Bleeearrghhh. This Twinlab protein tastes like ass compared to Optimum Nutrition 100% whey chocolate mint. We'll see if it tastes better if i add a scoop of ice cream to each shake.
 

Mully

Member
Well, I guess it depends on how low intensity the training is, but if you jog about 10 minutes per miles you're probably going to burn more calories than that unless you weigh nothing.

Bleeearrghhh. This Twinlab protein tastes like ass compared to Optimum Nutrition 100% whey chocolate mint. We'll see if it tastes better if i add a scoop of ice cream to each shake.

Haha add some hot fudge too.

HIT training is better for weight loss/cutting and twice a week. Jogging is great all around.
 

MjFrancis

Member
Keeping calories in check is a better fat loss tool than low-intensity steady-state cardio or high intensity interval training for fat loss. I think of the latter two options as the icing on the cake (but also prefer HIIT). Not to mention the frame of mind many people covet when they start counting the amount of calories they burn, they think they have full reign to eat a shitty meal. They overestimate how much they burn and underestimate how much they eat.

Just anecdotal evidence from those around me who have traveled that path. I recall reading a study or two that agreed with this sentiment, but I can't find them at the moment.
 

Enco

Member
Keeping calories in check is a better fat loss tool than low-intensity steady-state cardio or high intensity interval training for fat loss. I think of the latter two options as the icing on the cake (but also prefer HIIT). Not to mention the frame of mind many people covet when they start counting the amount of calories they burn, they think they have full reign to eat a shitty meal. They overestimate how much they burn and underestimate how much they eat.

Just anecdotal evidence from those around me who have traveled that path. I recall reading a study or two that agreed with this sentiment, but I can't find them at the moment.

Totally agree.

Calorie counting is really hard to do and that's where 90% of people fail.
 

entremet

Member
What's your heart rate getting up to and how long does it take you to recover?

I don't measure it. But I usually do 30 secs sprints followed by 60 second easy pace. I do it on the stationary bike. I never have my hands on the heart rate sensor.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
Based on the advice from my PT, I started doing 1 min sprints with 1 min of regular speed rowing on the machine. Holy fuck what a crazy effective exercise. Also not as mindnumbingly boring as regular row. I could last for 20 min on my first go, but I will work to increase that.

Frustrated by the slow weight loss in my first 2.5 weeks with my PT. I do 2 exercises a week with him (Mon = weight/circuit, Fri = sparring), and 2 cardio myself (Wed = spin, Tue = row+run). Eating 2000cal a day. Lost a sad 1.3kg only over the first 2.5 weeks.
 

dabig2

Member
The thing with HiiT is that the calories you burn during it are inconsequential. The benefit of HiiT resembles the benefits of weightlifting - you continue to burn fatty tissue LONG after your workout.

I've always been a fan of these 2 articles:
http://www.askmen.com/sports/bodybuilding_100/135_fitness_tip.html
http://www.simplyshredded.com/cardio-for-fat-loss-high-intensity-interval-training-cardio-vs-low-intensity-steady-state-cardio.html

Plus HiiT is a shit ton more fun than regular cardio :p
 

cameltoe

Member
Based on the advice from my PT, I started doing 1 min sprints with 1 min of regular speed rowing on the machine. Holy fuck what a crazy effective exercise. Also not as mindnumbingly boring as regular row. I could last for 20 min on my first go, but I will work to increase that.

Frustrated by the slow weight loss in my first 2.5 weeks with my PT. I do 2 exercises a week with him (Mon = weight/circuit, Fri = sparring), and 2 cardio myself (Wed = spin, Tue = row+run). Eating 2000cal a day. Lost a sad 1.3kg only over the first 2.5 weeks.

How much do you weigh? Whats your BMR? Body fat %?
 
Based on the advice from my PT, I started doing 1 min sprints with 1 min of regular speed rowing on the machine. Holy fuck what a crazy effective exercise. Also not as mindnumbingly boring as regular row. I could last for 20 min on my first go, but I will work to increase that.

Frustrated by the slow weight loss in my first 2.5 weeks with my PT. I do 2 exercises a week with him (Mon = weight/circuit, Fri = sparring), and 2 cardio myself (Wed = spin, Tue = row+run). Eating 2000cal a day. Lost a sad 1.3kg only over the first 2.5 weeks.

Losing almost 3 pounds in 2.5 weeks isn't bad, man. Weight loss is a gradual process.
 
For those doing leangains, has anyone done the 'recomp' diet? I know people have used it to bulk and lose weight but when I'm ready to cut, I don't want to lose weight as I am fine where I am at. I just want to be more cut. This points to 'recomp' but should I focus on losing the fat first and then go the recomp route?
 

Mr.City

Member
For those doing leangains, has anyone done the 'recomp' diet? I know people have used it to bulk and lose weight but when I'm ready to cut, I don't want to lose weight as I am fine where I am at. I just want to be more cut. This points to 'recomp' but should I focus on losing the fat first and then go the recomp route?

At first, I was baffled by what you were saying, but I understand a little. If you want to be more cut, then some weight loss is probably going to happen. What's your current situation like with training, body fat, etc?
 
At first, I was baffled by what you were saying, but I understand a little. If you want to be more cut, then some weight loss is probably going to happen. What's your current situation like with training, body fat, etc?

I'm just looking into the future right now, planning for the next steps.

Current routine is RPT, leangains style. Body fat, I'm not too sure. Maybe 15/16%.

IF isn't about calories or macros, it's about when you have your meals and the size of them.

You can apply whatever dietary framework you want on top of that.

If you need your hand held, try this:

Maintenance kcal: bw x14-16 (higher for men, lower for women)
Set protein at 1.5g/lb bw

Bulking:
Off days: 90% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, .75g/lb carbohydrate, rest from fat
Training days: 125% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, 2.5g/lb carbohydrate, rest from fat (should be fairly low)

Recomp:
Off days: 90% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, .5g/lb carbohydrate, rest from fat
Training days: 110% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, 2g/lb carbohydrate, rest from fat

Cutting:
Off days: 60% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, set carbs at 50g, rest from fat
Training days: 105% maintenance, 1.5g/lb protein, 2g/lb carbohydrate, rest from fat

Someone on T-Nation posted that. I can't find the exact post from LeanGains, but I know Martin talked about for the recomp, on workout days, eat 20% more and on off days, eat 20% less. I think for fat loss, it was 20% less overall.

I'm aware I'm going to lose weight. But the idea is to minimize fat loss and increase muscle gain so that I will still be 225/230 but with more muscle than fat. If that makes any sense.
 

Bit-Bit

Member
Hey guys, I've got some pretty nice definition on my upper abdominal and it's all due to diet and lifting weights. But I still have a small amount of fat covering my lower abdominal and was wondering if I can't get rid of it with some HIIT.

My question is I normally workout in the afternoon after work. But should I do my HIIT sprinting after the workout or should I split one in the morning and one in the afternoon? And if so, which one should I do first in the morning, lift weights or HIIT sprinting?
 

rage1973

Member
Someone on T-Nation posted that. I can't find the exact post from LeanGains, but I know Martin talked about for the recomp, on workout days, eat 20% more and on off days, eat 20% less. I think for fat loss, it was 20% less overall.

I'm aware I'm going to lose weight. But the idea is to minimize fat loss and increase muscle gain so that I will still be 225/230 but with more muscle than fat. If that makes any sense.

This is the best guide on how to calculate your macro depending on cut, bulk or recomp.
http://rippedbody.jp/2011/10/23/how-to-calculate-leangains-macros/
 

Brolic Gaoler

formerly Alienshogun
What did Petrie do?

Dunno, but here's a new pic!

Feb2012.JPG


Deload done for the week. Can't wait to be back at it on Monday. Random guy that's always at the gym came up and tapped my on the shoulder today commenting on how strong and fit I'm getting. Felt good, even if it seemed a little creepy.
 

Trey

Member
Dunno, but here's a new pic!

514183853-04d7e0eefddff0cbcb9043ce657adbfa.4f357740-full.jpg


Deload done for the week. Can't wait to be back at it on Monday. Random guy that's always at the gym came up and tapped my on the shoulder today commenting on how strong and fit I'm getting. Felt good, even if it seemed a little creepy.

Beast.

Yesterday's attempt at a workout was an utter failure. Forgot my gym chalk at home and only allowed myself about 45 minutes to workout. Compounded with me trying to go for a PR in squats. Yeesh, never again. I shall rally tomorrow with righteous fury.

Just checked Petrie's posting history: he started posting in a weight problem/self loathing thread. Things went bad.
 

Brolic Gaoler

formerly Alienshogun
Beast.

Yesterday's attempt at a workout was an utter failure. Forgot my gym chalk at home and only allowed myself about 45 minutes to workout. Compounded with me trying to go for a PR in squats. Yeesh, never again. I shall rally tomorrow with righteous fury.

Just checked Petrie's posting history: he started posting in a weight problem/self loathing thread. Things went bad.

Just the description of the thread is enough to understand what happened. I'm guessing someone got offended, lol.

As for what happened with you, yeah, I hate when I have to work out in a constrained time frame. Nothing worse than feeling rushed.
 

Trey

Member
Just the description of the thread is enough to understand what happened. I'm guessing someone got offended, lol.

As for what happened with you, yeah, I hate when I have to work out in a constrained time frame. Nothing worse than feeling rushed.

Yeah, just gotta put it behind me. I was disappointed in myself but I'm not going to allow myself to dwell on it. Happens.

And I knew what must have happened from the thread title. Damn son. Just ain't safe to talk like you would around here in a thread like that. Shouldn't be gone for too long.
 

Mr.City

Member
Holy shit, Romando! The rage and sadness in that thread was staggering. So many uniformed people foaming at the mouth when they just want their pants to fit better and a little less junk in the trunk. Couple that with the pleasure addiction, and oh boy!
 
I'm never gonna be able to OHP 5 reps @ 165.

The 5th one just kills me every single time. Sucks.

Oh well, gotta keep going! Gonna try one more time next week before deloading.
 

Domino Theory

Crystal Dynamics
I'm just looking into the future right now, planning for the next steps.

Current routine is RPT, leangains style. Body fat, I'm not too sure. Maybe 15/16%.



Someone on T-Nation posted that. I can't find the exact post from LeanGains, but I know Martin talked about for the recomp, on workout days, eat 20% more and on off days, eat 20% less. I think for fat loss, it was 20% less overall.

I'm aware I'm going to lose weight. But the idea is to minimize fat loss and increase muscle gain so that I will still be 225/230 but with more muscle than fat. If that makes any sense.

I've been on Leangains for 13 months now, but only started the recomp. portion on November of last year. I haven't seen too much of a change in my physique, but I have gotten MUCH stronger since I started the recomp.

I attribute my small change in physique due to the calorie range confusion I have and the fact that every two weeks or so I cheat for one or two meals and I feel as though those cheats are strong enough to negate a week's worth of progress. :(

Everytime I try to calculate my maintenance calories from multiple sources, I always get a wide range anywhere from 2,500 cal to 2,900 and there's no fucking way I need 2,900 cal to maintain myself. One number that's been sort of consistent in popping up is 2,600 cal so I'm sticking to that.

Workout days = 2,800-3,000 cal
Rest days = 2,000 cal
 
so back to the hiit vs steady state cardio discussion:

i've got a 5k coming up in about 7 weeks. the only cardio i've been doing is just playing a lot of basketball (about 3 times a week, about 1.5-2 hours not counting the wait in between games) which kind of simulates hiit to a lesser extent.

do you guys think 5k is a distance that i need to truly train for by jogging that distance a couple times during the week? or should i keep up with the basketball and maybe add a day of hiit? right now im pretty much lifting 2x and playnig ball 3x during the week.
 
I attribute my small change in physique due to the calorie range confusion I have and the fact that every two weeks or so I cheat for one or two meals and I feel as though those cheats are strong enough to negate a week's worth of progress. :(
Unless your cheat meals are 6000 calories of icecream i doubt a few hundred calories will make that much of a difference.
 

Brolic Gaoler

formerly Alienshogun
Unless your cheat meals are 6000 calories of icecream i doubt a few hundred calories will make that much of a difference.

Seriously. I have a cheat day every week usually on Fri/Sat and shit's going really well.

Just had a buffalo chicken sandwich with fries and a blue moon.

I'm not on that crazy ass fast though.
 

Mr.City

Member
Unless your cheat meals are 6000 calories of icecream i doubt a few hundred calories will make that much of a difference.

Wait a sec, it might. LG usually works with a 20% surplus on lifting days and a 20% deficit on rest days, so if you do the math, he's only going off of a 20% deficit total for the week. Depending on the person, that can be around 300-500 calories.
 
so back to the hiit vs steady state cardio discussion:

i've got a 5k coming up in about 7 weeks. the only cardio i've been doing is just playing a lot of basketball (about 3 times a week, about 1.5-2 hours not counting the wait in between games) which kind of simulates hiit to a lesser extent.

do you guys think 5k is a distance that i need to truly train for by jogging that distance a couple times during the week? or should i keep up with the basketball and maybe add a day of hiit? right now im pretty much lifting 2x and playnig ball 3x during the week.

5k is nothing, the basketball should be more than enough.
 

rage1973

Member
so back to the hiit vs steady state cardio discussion:

i've got a 5k coming up in about 7 weeks. the only cardio i've been doing is just playing a lot of basketball (about 3 times a week, about 1.5-2 hours not counting the wait in between games) which kind of simulates hiit to a lesser extent.

do you guys think 5k is a distance that i need to truly train for by jogging that distance a couple times during the week? or should i keep up with the basketball and maybe add a day of hiit? right now im pretty much lifting 2x and playnig ball 3x during the week.

I have a 10k race I am running this Sunday and the most training I have done is to run 1 mile on treadmill. 5k shouldn't be that big of a deal unless your cardio is in terrible shape.
 

MjFrancis

Member
I find it takes a lot of focus to do step-ups at all. Doing them without pushing with the foot/leg on the floor takes a generous helping of humblesauce.

Doing them high-rep must suck, but yeah, better than lunges. Either of them are taxing enough (when done with sufficient weight) to make most any man say "Fuck this" and hit the leg press instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom