• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Flat Earthers plan incredible trip to Antarctica to reach ‘end of the world’

S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
Do do they not believe in math?

The Greek figured this out 2000 years ago.. You can figure out exact circumference of the earth.. I mean they must know this, do they not??

OSC_Astro_02_02_Eratosthen.jpg
Math was made by humans so there is plenty of error. Checkmate round earther!
 

CeroFrio996

Banned
I wish I'd seen this sooner, then I could make a dumb joke about how they're meeting up from all around the world. Ah well. It just tickles me that even of they manage to do this without all of them dying of frostbite they wont change their minds
 

timeflais

Banned
Flat-earth intentionally injected to manipulate perception.
Associated with "chem-trails"?
Earth is not flat.
Geoengineering is real.
Geoengineering to be introduced as a tool to combat climate change?
"May cause harm, but not as much as global warming"
Planetary cycles vs human caused.
Chem-trails vs Geoengineering?
The first Kingsman movie, what was the antagonist involved in?
News cycles that introduce a subject are already years in advance.
Geoengineering patents since ...



 

CharlesMorgan

Neo Member
I don't think that they will be allowed to run around Antarctica at will. Some parts of Antarctica are totally sealed off unless you're John Kerry. They'll have to steer clear of those areas.
 
Last edited:

Geki-D

Banned
Do do they not believe in math?

The Greek figured this out 2000 years ago.. You can figure out exact circumference of the earth.. I mean they must know this, do they not??

OSC_Astro_02_02_Eratosthen.jpg
A lot of them argue -and I swear this is true- that math isn't "real life" and unless you can physically measure the Earth by wrapping a real tape measure around it, the evidence is invalid.
 

Weilthain

Banned
How do flat earthers explain gravity?

They would say something like it’s just mass and boyency. And that there is a set up and down.

Then they would say something like show me an example in nature where something due to its mass creates gravity and pulls smaller objects to it.

You’d have to resort to a maths equation or something like that and they wouldn’t accept it as proof of gravity.
 

Papa

Banned
They would say something like it’s just mass and boyency. And that there is a set up and down.

Then they would say something like show me an example in nature where something due to its mass creates gravity and pulls smaller objects to it.

You’d have to resort to a maths equation or something like that and they wouldn’t accept it as proof of gravity.

Why we still got flat earthers?
 

Weilthain

Banned
Why we still got flat earthers?

Most flat earth stuff is disinformation created to be people’s first exposure to the idea. They see the ridiculous arguments put forth and rightly dismiss the idea and move on.

People who fall for the disinformation are usually retarded or so extremely religious they are basically retarded.

Once you get past the disinformation you can start to unravel some of the weird shit.

The actual answer is because there is no real pictures of the “globe” from space. It’s all fake. The whole space stuff is largely fake.
 
Last edited:

zeomax

Member
Bitch there's YouTube footage of a weather balloon taking a GoPro into space. How can you think that's CGI? Your eyes are excellent at detecting genuine things even if your a dumass.
They think it was filmed with a fisheye lens and that's why the earth looks curved in the videos.
 

Wwg1wga

Member
Wow! why don't they send a gopro with a weather balloon in the atmosphere it's way way cheaper and it only takes less than 2 hours to confirm that the earth is not flat.
 

pawel86ck

Banned
Lol...what
What evidence is there of a hollow earth?
I'm not saying hollow earth is a fact, because I only believe what I can see on my own eyes, but there are interesting facts/anomalies:

-Seismic data
-Growing earth (therefore earth can be indeed hollow)

-The negative anomalies over the polar openings are so great that the U.S. has lost satellites over them. Today there are no satellites in polar orbit.
he3.gif

-Nowadays only government-approved teams are allowed anywhere near the poles, but historically almost every explorer who has traveled to the poles has recorded that as you get closer, it gets warmer, the snow and ice disappear, and greenery and wild-life reappear. Even modern-day explorers continue finding driftwood, pollen, animals, and insects the closer they get to the poles.
-The temperature, as one gets past a certain latitude, increases as one approaches the poles, which is not supposed to happen; arctic (and in less cases, antarctic) explorers have reported in their ship's logs to have taken off their climate gear
-Floating flora and fauna near the northern polar region's ocean: seeds, flowers and trees are found at latitudes where none should be, and they are often very fresh, not decomposed from many months of floating in the ocean currents that might have brought them from far away
-Many bird species in the northern hemisphere migrate north - before winter; birds in the southern hemisphere migrate south in their winter, too - if the poles are the coldest regions, it makes no sense, but flocks of millions of birds like the auk have been observed doing this, and they must have a very good reason
-The origin of icebergs: around the north pole, they are made of frozen sweetwater - not frozen saltwater. There is little if any precipitation of rain or snow (sweetwater) in the polar regions. Saltwater freezes to sea ice at low enough temperatures. There is no supply of sweetwater to explain the existence of icebergs which are hundreds of feet high, up to hundreds of miles long and dozens of miles wide
-All the solar system's outer planets emit more energy than they receive from the sun
-Larger planets with more mass should spin more slowly than smaller planets with less mass - but they don't: the largest, Jupiter, spins a lot faster (once every 10 hours) than Mercury, which is just a tiny fraction the size of Jupiter and needs 58 Earth days for one spin around its axis
he8.gif

he9.gif

-A massive planetary body with an incandescent and progressively cooling core would crack into pieces while cooling and shrinking
-A spinning planetary body in formation has zero gravity in its center, so mass does accumulate where gravitational and centrifugal forces are balanced within the area of the spinning matter, and that form would be a sphere with openings at the top and bottom, like a hurricane of matter in space - not as a solid body with a solid center (the center has zero gravity)
-Both Earth and Moon ring hollow for hours after struck with meteorites, as measured by seismic stations on Earth and on the Moon
-Earthquakes do not occur deeper than 450 miles, but down there, the supposedly molten magma would not create and release friction via earthquakes - a viscous or molten mass equalizes tension, it does not accumulate tension because it is flexible
-Gravity experiments in mine shafts show that the balls pointing to the center of gravity point away from the center of the Earth, instead of towards it, as measured by the distance at the top and bottom of two lead balls hanging from very long wires into a mine shaft

Why people dont want to talk about these facts/anomalies? Well maybe because many hollow earth theories involves UFO as well, and that's not what you want in the public scene. I will link few interesting theories and videos in the spoiler below... just remember watch at your own risk😉😀

NASA photos with pole opening


Admiral Byrd expedition to the pole and his encounter with UFO


Extremely long but interesting book that talks about Byrd expedition, it's mentioned here what he saw in details
 
Last edited:

DESTROYA

Member
I'm not saying hollow earth is a fact, because I only believe what I can see on my own eyes, but there are interesting facts/anomalies:

-Seismic data
-Growing earth (therefore earth can be indeed hollow)

-The negative anomalies over the polar openings are so great that the U.S. has lost satellites over them. Today there are no satellites in polar orbit.
he3.gif

-Nowadays only government-approved teams are allowed anywhere near the poles, but historically almost every explorer who has traveled to the poles has recorded that as you get closer, it gets warmer, the snow and ice disappear, and greenery and wild-life reappear. Even modern-day explorers continue finding driftwood, pollen, animals, and insects the closer they get to the poles.
-The temperature, as one gets past a certain latitude, increases as one approaches the poles, which is not supposed to happen; arctic (and in less cases, antarctic) explorers have reported in their ship's logs to have taken off their climate gear
-Floating flora and fauna near the northern polar region's ocean: seeds, flowers and trees are found at latitudes where none should be, and they are often very fresh, not decomposed from many months of floating in the ocean currents that might have brought them from far away
-Many bird species in the northern hemisphere migrate north - before winter; birds in the southern hemisphere migrate south in their winter, too - if the poles are the coldest regions, it makes no sense, but flocks of millions of birds like the auk have been observed doing this, and they must have a very good reason
-The origin of icebergs: around the north pole, they are made of frozen sweetwater - not frozen saltwater. There is little if any precipitation of rain or snow (sweetwater) in the polar regions. Saltwater freezes to sea ice at low enough temperatures. There is no supply of sweetwater to explain the existence of icebergs which are hundreds of feet high, up to hundreds of miles long and dozens of miles wide
-All the solar system's outer planets emit more energy than they receive from the sun
-Larger planets with more mass should spin more slowly than smaller planets with less mass - but they don't: the largest, Jupiter, spins a lot faster (once every 10 hours) than Mercury, which is just a tiny fraction the size of Jupiter and needs 58 Earth days for one spin around its axis
he8.gif

he9.gif

-A massive planetary body with an incandescent and progressively cooling core would crack into pieces while cooling and shrinking
-A spinning planetary body in formation has zero gravity in its center, so mass does accumulate where gravitational and centrifugal forces are balanced within the area of the spinning matter, and that form would be a sphere with openings at the top and bottom, like a hurricane of matter in space - not as a solid body with a solid center (the center has zero gravity)
-Both Earth and Moon ring hollow for hours after struck with meteorites, as measured by seismic stations on Earth and on the Moon
-Earthquakes do not occur deeper than 450 miles, but down there, the supposedly molten magma would not create and release friction via earthquakes - a viscous or molten mass equalizes tension, it does not accumulate tension because it is flexible
-Gravity experiments in mine shafts show that the balls pointing to the center of gravity point away from the center of the Earth, instead of towards it, as measured by the distance at the top and bottom of two lead balls hanging from very long wires into a mine shaft

Why people dont want to talk about these facts/anomalies? Well maybe because many hollow earth theories involves UFO as well, and that's not what you want in the public scene. I will link few interesting theories and videos in the spoiler below... just remember watch at your own risk😉😀

NASA photos with pole opening


Admiral Byrd expedition to the pole and his encounter with UFO


Extremely long but interesting book that talks about Byrd expedition, it's mentioned here what he saw in details

Interesting.
Love reading about different theories and possible explanations but ....according to that first video the earth grew to about 4-5 times in size? How do you explain all the extra mass? Where did it come from?
I’m no scientist but from what I know that’s not possible.
 

pawel86ck

Banned
Interesting.
Love reading about different theories and possible explanations but ....according to that first video the earth grew to about 4-5 times in size? How do you explain all the extra mass? Where did it come from?
I’m no scientist but from what I know that’s not possible.
The same like a balloon, so force from the inside push outer layer further and further making whole planet grow (and without any extra mass). The implication is earth should be hollow in order to grow and growing earth evidence support hollow earth theory.

Many years ago (somewhere around 2007) I have watched interview with one researcher who explained planets arnt made from a dust like most people believe, but star (like our sun) is a real planet maker. I dont remember his name, but according to him when small sun is ejected from the sun it drifts further away into deep cold space and the outer layer starts to harden. The outer layer is then pushed more and more and planet is growing bigger and bigger.

And how hollow planet should look something like that:

310px-Map_of_the_Interior_World.png


In the center is a inner sun (according to that researcher it's the remaing multimaterial from the star in it's original state), and it should provide light and warmth to support life. There is an interesting concept as above, so below and maybe it applies to planets as well.

Heart_Blog_Energy_LawOfAttraction_SelfHelp.png


And here's how human energy field looks like. For some reason it reminds me how hollow earth shouod look like, because there are two openings on the poles and similar energy circulation.

Like I have said in my previous post, personally I only believe if I can see something on my own eyes, so it's not like I'm convinced the hollow earth theory is true, but I find it interesting. Sometimes the truth is stanger than fiction but even if the hollow earth theory is true there must be a good reason why world elites dont want normal people to know about it.
 

zeomax

Member
Many bird species in the northern hemisphere migrate north - before winter; birds in the southern hemisphere migrate south in their winter, too - if the poles are the coldest regions, it makes no sense, but flocks of millions of birds like the auk have been observed doing this, and they must have a very good reason
Birds don't flying to the poles. They are flying to warmer regions during the winter. Here in Europe it is Central Afrika.
Vogelzug.png


Larger planets with more mass should spin more slowly than smaller planets with less mass - but they don't: the largest, Jupiter, spins a lot faster (once every 10 hours) than Mercury, which is just a tiny fraction the size of Jupiter and needs 58 Earth days for one spin around its axis
Mercury is the closest planet to the sun. The orbit takes only 88 days and the extreme gravitation from the sun have almost synchronised the rotation of the Planet with the orbit. Same effect as the Earth and Moon.

Why people dont want to talk about these facts/anomalies?
Because they are all bullshit and based on misunderstanding of the simple physics.
 
Last edited:

xrnzaaas

Member
Why share these plans with the public? Now they're going to be silenced for sure before they get a chance to tell about their groundbreaking findings...
 
Last edited:

Magik85

Member
Wow! why don't they send a gopro with a weather balloon in the atmosphere it's way way cheaper and it only takes less than 2 hours to confirm that the earth is not flat.


Because from 90000 ft. you still cant really see curvarture and the result in that video is really just fisheye lens.
90000ft. is too insignificant compared to earth size. To see real curve you had to be wayyyyyyy further from the planet.
 

pawel86ck

Banned
Birds don't flying to the poles. They are flying to warmer regions during the winter. Here in Europe it is Central Afrika.
Vogelzug.png


Mercury is the closest planet to the sun. The orbit takes only 88 days and the extreme gravitation from the sun have almost synchronised the rotation of the Planet with the orbit. Same effect as the Earth and Moon.

Because they are all bullshit and based on misunderstanding of the simple physics.
Not from the central Europe but from areas around the poles. Animals like auk migrate south for the winter.

What Mercury orbit has to do with my post? When it comes to the gravity, there exists no real engineering theory of Gravity, All we have is guesswork, basic algebraic expressions of Newton, and the observations of astronomers. Gravity tells us what to do, we do not tell it what to do, so the idea of gravity is akin to the idea of God, unknowable.

It looks like even NASA believe there's a hole in the center of Antarctica 😀. Below is a series of still images from the NASA video
he1.gif

hxe2.gif


If you look carefully, you can see a dark spot from where the auroral radiation is emanating from



In the video description you can download the same video from the NASA servers. You suggest NASA has doctored their own video to make hollow earth theory😂👌?

And some other interesting videos/links

-NASA spacecraft Cassini to Saturn has returned an excellent image of the south polar opening of Saturn.
-This simple experiment makes a great argument for hollow earth theory. It makes sense that a spinning drop of universal matter would centrifugally throw lighter matter outward. No matter is thrown towards the poles, hence the polar holes.

-Continents dont drift apart, they are forced apart because of planet expansion

-Interesting pilot testimony

-Picture of Mars that shows huge dent
mars-5-22-2016-Fernando-Rodriguez-Florida-sq-e1464731496439.jpg

-hollow earth vs solid earth
 
Last edited:

zeomax

Member
What Mercury orbit has to do with my post?
You said Jupiter spins faster as Mercury and that was impossible because of mass. My answer was a litte explanation why Mercury spins slower. It is because of its orbit and not mass.
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Flat earthers have to rank among the dumbest people on earth. Right up there with moon landing conspiracy nuts and 9/11 "truthers".
 

pawel86ck

Banned
You said Jupiter spins faster as Mercury and that was impossible because of mass. My answer was a litte explanation why Mercury spins slower. It is because of its orbit and not mass.
Jupiter rotates faster than any other planet in the Solar System, you can google it.


 

pawel86ck

Banned
Yes i know. Whats your point?
The point is, Jupiter rotates faster than any other planet despite it's mass, that's a fact. Your explanation is interesting guesswork but the problem is besides Jupiter there are also other planets orbiting much closer and further from the sun, and yet these planets still dont spin as fast.

Now tell me what do you think about these NASA pictures. Do you think NASA has doctored their own materials just to make jokes from people later on?😀
 
Last edited:

zeomax

Member
Your explanation is interesting guesswork but the problem is besides Jupiter there are also other planets much closer and further from the sun, and yet these planets still dont spin as fast.
It's not guessing it is fact.

Earth - Mars: similar planets similar rotation
Jupiter - Saturn: similar planets similar rotation
Uranus - Neptune: similar planets similar rotation
Mercury - Venus: different planets different rotation

whats your problem with Jupiter?
 
Last edited:

Wwg1wga

Member
Because from 90000 ft. you still cant really see curvarture and the result in that video is really just fisheye lens.
90000ft. is too insignificant compared to earth size. To see real curve you had to be wayyyyyyy further from the planet.
Fair enough, no fisheye lens here : Filmed with a Canon Legria FS200 video camera with 37 x optical Zoom. The camera height from the sand was 3 feet 10 inches (117 cm)

 
Last edited:

pawel86ck

Banned
It's not guessing it is fact.

Earth - Mars: similar planets similar rotation
Jupiter - Saturn: similar planets similar rotation
Uranus - Neptune: similar planets similar rotation
Mercury - Venus: different planets different rotation

whats your problem with Jupiter?
Now you are talking about size and it's correlation with planet rotation like you should from the start, but before you have said certain planets have slow rotation because of their orbits and not mass. Here's what you wrote:
My answer was a litte explanation why Mercury spins slower. It is because of its orbit and not mass.
That's not a gueeswork on your part? If not so where I can read about it?

And again, what's your opinion in regards to these NASA photos? You dont want to discuss it, because it's a real proof coming from NASA themselves?
 

Magik85

Member
Fair enough, no fisheye lens here : Filmed with a Canon Legria FS200 video camera with 37 x optical Zoom. The camera height from the sand was 3 feet 10 inches (117 cm)


You dont have to convince me....im not flat earther :)
I was just refering to videos from "edge of space" showing the curve of the horizon.
 

zeomax

Member
but before you have said certain planets have slow rotation because of their orbits and not mass
Yes, you asked why Mercury spinning slower as Jupiter and not why every planet rotating at a certain speed.

And again, what's your opinion in regards to these NASA photos? You dont want to discuss it, because it's a real proof coming from NASA themselves?
In the 70s there was a picture of the Mars surface that looked like a face (Cydonia Mensae). Why did it looks like a face? Because of a shitty image quality. Now you are showing a blurry image of a dark spot. Of course, it musst be a hole in the North Pole!!!

That's not a gueeswork on your part? If not so where I can read about it?

"For many years it was thought that Mercury was synchronously tidally locked with the Sun, rotating once for each orbit and always keeping the same face directed towards the Sun, in the same way that the same side of the Moon always faces Earth. Radar observations in 1965 proved that the planet has a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance, rotating three times for every two revolutions around the Sun."
 
Last edited:

pawel86ck

Banned
Yes, you asked why Mercury spinning slower as Jupiter and not why every planet rotating at a certain speed.


In the 70s there was a picture of the Mars surface that looked like a face (Cydonia Mensae). Why did it looks like a face? Because of a shitty image quality. Now you are showing a blurry image of a dark spot. Of course, it musst be a hole in the North Pole!!!
NASA video is not in HD, but it's also not extremely blurry like you try to suggest and besides auroral radiation is clearly emanating from that hole during movement 😀👌.
 

Azelover

Titanic was called the Ship of Dreams, and it was. It really was.
Although slightly outlandish, I thought this theory was pretty interesting, until I heard these people's explanation on gravity..

I can't..
 
Last edited:

Magik85

Member
how do flat earthers explain the phases of the moon?
Nothing really works in their model really. Sunsets/sunrises etc. But they always come up with some buzzwords they dont even understand.
But id like to have a laugh seeing an attempt of explaining things like midnight sun on south pole or night sky rotating anticlockwise in north and clockwise in southern hemosphere xD
 

zeomax

Member
For this problem they have another model. But they are not interchangeable. The day and night model doesn't work with the Moon phases model, the eclipse or the seasons model.
 
Last edited:
Not from the central Europe but from areas around the poles. Animals like auk migrate south for the winter.

What Mercury orbit has to do with my post? When it comes to the gravity, there exists no real engineering theory of Gravity, All we have is guesswork, basic algebraic expressions of Newton, and the observations of astronomers. Gravity tells us what to do, we do not tell it what to do, so the idea of gravity is akin to the idea of God, unknowable.

It looks like even NASA believe there's a hole in the center of Antarctica 😀. Below is a series of still images from the NASA video
he1.gif

hxe2.gif


If you look carefully, you can see a dark spot from where the auroral radiation is emanating from



In the video description you can download the same video from the NASA servers. You suggest NASA has doctored their own video to make hollow earth theory😂👌?

And some other interesting videos/links

-NASA spacecraft Cassini to Saturn has returned an excellent image of the south polar opening of Saturn.
-This simple experiment makes a great argument for hollow earth theory. It makes sense that a spinning drop of universal matter would centrifugally throw lighter matter outward. No matter is thrown towards the poles, hence the polar holes.

-Continents dont drift apart, they are forced apart because of planet expansion

-Interesting pilot testimony

-Picture of Mars that shows huge dent
mars-5-22-2016-Fernando-Rodriguez-Florida-sq-e1464731496439.jpg

-hollow earth vs solid earth

That thing that looks like a hole is not a hole. It's the aftermath of when you stitch a panoramic together. Since earth is a sphere, it's difficult to take a perfect picture of it. You will find a similar stitching error on Google Maps.
 
Honestly why didn't they try this before building janky ass rockets... far less dangerous. Do they think Lizardmen have technology that can mess with their compasses?
 
lol do we have a flat-eather in the thread?

Y'see... the earth is a really... really large body. Open up a vector art program, create a circle and start zooming in on its' circumference. Eventually you'll be so zoomed in it will appear flat. Now you understand what you're seeing.

I often wonder if flat earthers even travel to different countries in the world. They really don't seem to understand the scale of things. It's like their world is so small. It's makes me sad, really.
 
Top Bottom