Probably because he'll play shit, score a 'penalty or something', and the media will still suck his cock.
But he's Scottish m8
I won't to be optimistic, but Hedgehog likes to stick to his favourites and his turgid formations
Don't be surprised to see Milner and Cleverly in contention for starting places. Saying that, the starting team against Denmark was pretty promising.
Joe Hart
Glen Johnson Chris Smalling Gary Cahill Ashley Cole
Jack Wilshere Jordan Henderson Steven Gerrard Raheem Sterling
Wayne Rooney Daniel Sturridge
Bring Jags and Baines in I don't think there will be too many complaints
I think we'll beat Costa Rica 1 nill, Rooney penalty or something (mugs on here will still call him every name under the sun), draw to Italy in a right fucking boring game and lose to Uruguay.
Not hopeful.
Waaa Rooney hasn't played his best and still scored 17 league goals waaa
Why is nobody writing shit about him
Athletico actually conceded twice in four matches against Barcelona and Chelsea. Not so impressive now are we?
---
Happy Birthday MEIER!
Because I believe we'd play better and perform better as a team - because football, my sweet Linny, is a team game - if Rooney didn't play in the position he does.
1-0 down, 90th minute in the World Cup final, England get a chance to equalise and take the game to extra time. Bearing down on the keeper, 1 on 1, do you pick
a) Rooney
b) Sturridge
I know who I'd want in that situation, and it's not Daniel.
Because I believe we'd play better and perform better as a team - because football, my sweet Linny, is a team game - if Rooney didn't play in the position he does.
1-0 down, 90th minute in the World Cup final, England get a chance to equalise and take the game to extra time. Bearing down on the keeper, 1 on 1, do you pick
a) Rooney
b) Sturridge
I know who I'd want in that situation, and it's not Daniel.
Yeah football is a team game. Which is why isn't fucking dumb to single out somebody who scored 17 league goals rather than your league one standard wingers or your ancient centrebacks who have the turning circle of a blue whale after a sunday roast or your hilariously average midfielders
If it's a team game, why is everyone pooping on Rooney?
I ain't saying he's been shit hot either.
Eh
--
3Sixty, they said that about Algeria!!!
--
Happy Bday Meier
Rooney is a Manchester United legend, soon to be all time top scorer and your captain. You would do well to show some respect, hairless cuntflap.
Uruguay are dog shit. Suarez + 10. Just get someone to crunch him in the 1st min and we'll be fine.
One of my real life friends that actually likes football down here is basically the worst fan.
He is a Spurs fan, but loves Bale. So last week when Bale was sick and on the bench, he says 'fuck Real, Bale isn't playing go Bayern'.....
Then yesterday he says 'Come on Chelsea!' in which I respond 'Why? Atletico are the peoples champ' to which he says, 'fuck the people, London first'......
He's not from London...
Drmic is basically a Leverkusen player at this point. Amazing
Farfán could make a move to Liverpool
Draxler is dead
Drmic is basically a Leverkusen player at this point. Amazing
Farfán could make a move to Liverpool
Draxler is dead
Later guys :] tweet me if you need anything/want to banter me to death
pulga are you going to Lisboa?
do you guys think i shit gold
1-0 down, 90th minute in the World Cup final, England get a chance to equalise and take the game to extra time. Bearing down on the keeper, 1 on 1, do you pick
a) Rooney
b) Sturridge
I know who I'd want in that situation, and it's not Daniel.
On current form yes, however i believe sturridge is more of a team player, ie running into space, passing etc. however rooney is capable of being an individual talent, and creating a chance. In a squad as guileless as england, rooney will most likely get the nod.What exactly is your point here? Rooney is better at one-on-ones?
Turn the question into 'you're picking an England team for a WC final and you can only have one striker, who do you pick' and the answer for me becomes Sturridge, by a distance.
What exactly is your point here? Rooney is better at one-on-ones?
Turn the question into 'you're picking an England team for a WC final and you can only have one striker, who do you pick' and the answer for me becomes Sturridge, by a distance.
1-0 down, 90th minute in the World Cup final, England get a chance to equalise and take the game to extra time. Bearing down on the keeper, 1 on 1, do you pick
a) Rooney
b) Sturridge
I know who I'd want in that situation, and it's not Daniel.
crouch. what a relict of the 00s lol
Crouch is the goat, he had a better scoring record internationally then Ronaldo for a long time.
On current form yes, however i believe sturridge is more of a team player, ie running into space, passing etc. however rooney is capable of being an individual talent, and creating a chance. In a squad as guileless as england, rooney will most likely get the nod.
In my professional opinion, england would be better served by old school shit team tactics, 11 players perpetually running, pressing and tackling. Otherwise they will get rekt.
Fack Rooney
Good player. Been utterly shite for England like the rest of the golden generation.
Going to bake in Brazil. And then Lewis gets his hands on him. Oh yes.
Those bananas will give them the power to thrash Hamburg.
Looks like Freiburg are hoping to get Ginter on loan for next season, after selling him to BVB. Would be good for everyone involved I think
lol no
We would've won if he had started.
True legend.
milch pls
Bender is constantly injured, Kehl as well, Gündogan might be dead, Subotic just comes back from a 6-month-injury and Friedrich is gone. Why would we loan out a ~10m signing?