I don't, and have never owned the game.
I defend it because it should, by any standards, be a true "feelgood" story for the industry. A tiny indie team takes on a project of immense scope, and despite delivering pretty much what was promised, got absolutely shellacked because their non-media trained lead coder got thrust into the spotlight and ended up fucking up the messaging.
Following the sort of response that would make most devs embittered and cynical, they then spend the next 7 fucking years constantly expanding and enhancing the game at no additional cost. Resulting in a product now that by general consensus is vastly more and better than what was promised at the outset.
Once again; this is a tiny indie, not some corporate behemoth with an endless money supply to prop up their franchises.
And yet, as I pointed out, there are people like you who just have to shit on the game and anyone who likes or defends it, because... Umm, because ? I dunno, your opinion is so deathlessly important that you have to run your mouth about it any opportunity.
Hey your ‘tiny indie’ made a fuck-tonne load of money off the game. The sales were huge. Before many realised they’d been sold a dud.
How do you think they’ve funded all these updates?
I’m sorry but I don’t care about the whole overplayed redemption fairy tale narrative. I care about games. Good games.
Last edited: