The best revenge is...Chickenhawk bastards. You can bury them both under the jail as far as I'm concerned.
Wouldn't killing them be giving them the easy way out? I say we chemically castrate them - thus removing their weapons - and then leave them to rot for a good decade or so, before releasing them back in to the public, where everyone knows exactly who they are and what they did. Let them suffer.Chickenhawk bastards. You can bury them both under the jail as far as I'm concerned.
Jesus, that article is heartbreaking.While you're considering this, I urge you to read the following article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/m...tution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html
Given that Amy's pictures have spread so far and wide, it's entirely possible she will have to go through yet another visit from officers, detailing how Jared Fogle had copies of her photos on his drive. I particularly want the folks who think consumption of child pornography is somehow more acceptable than production to read this article. Both the law and psychology assure us that victims of child pornography are continually re-victimized by having their photos out there. If you're looking at them, you're as much of a shitbag as the guy that took them.
He's not a minority.Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
You want classy newspapers? You haven't even seen classy newspapers till you see those in new yaaaaaawkSo, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
What's really shocking is that it took until the 1970's for the U.S government to ban child pornography. Like, really, what possible reasoning could they have for thinking it was OK to view it before then? I mean, it would literally be sold alongside your usual smutty magazine as if it were normal. It's fucking ridiculous. Not that banning it has done much good. As that article states, it's so easy to find child porn and, as is the case with Amy and Nicole, their trauma will never be over. It truly is a sick, depraved world we live in.
Holy shitSo, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
Heh. Stay classy, New York.So, uh...today's New York Post front page.
I'm still struggling to get my head round that.Yeah, that shit blew my mind. Congress only made it illegal in 1978. That is crazy.
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
The joke is that he won't be able to order a foot long Subway sandwich in jail because they probably only have prison food.
Or is it about a penis?
It's always penis
Does he get to bring his fat pants to prison with him so he can inspire others
I'm just stunned that they went for the prison rape joke so quickly.It's the New York Post.
Whaddya expect?
They can't all be "Headless Body in Topless Bar" or "Tiger Pulls Out" tier.
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
What's really shocking is that it took until the 1970's for the U.S government to ban child pornography. Like, really, what possible reasoning could they have for thinking it was OK to view it before then? I mean, it would literally be sold alongside your usual smutty magazine as if it were normal. It's fucking ridiculous. Not that banning it has done much good. As that article states, it's so easy to find child porn and, as is the case with Amy and Nicole, their trauma will never be over. It truly is a sick, depraved world we live in.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
DAMN son hahahaha, never change NY.So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
It still is pretty shitty, evidentally.What made segregation OK before that? The world used to be pretty shitty just 40 years ago.
So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
While you're considering this, I urge you to read the following article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/m...tution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html
Given that Amy's pictures have spread so far and wide, it's entirely possible she will have to go through yet another visit from officers, detailing how Jared Fogle had copies of her photos on his drive. I particularly want the folks who think consumption of child pornography is somehow more acceptable than production to read this article. Both the law and psychology assure us that victims of child pornography are continually re-victimized by having their photos out there. If you're looking at them, you're as much of a shitbag as the guy that took them.
Same, i think its hysterical.I don't care if this is classless, this is fucking amazing.
Joking about rape can be funny.
Is there any evidence he was doing this shit before he became the Subway guy?
Whistleblower wearing a wire for 4 and a half years. Wow, dude dug himself a hole deeper than the Marianas Trench.
Jared Has Aides is actually on TV right now.
I read a report where the sherffs said he did attempt itI'm really, really surprised that there hasn't been word of a suicide attempt. I can't think of any other way out for Jared at this point.
He's on a diet right? Plenty of tossed salads where he's goin'.So, uh... today's New York Post front page...
#rektSo, uh... today's New York Post front page...
Link?I read a report where the sherffs said he did attempt it