So you're just gonna act like the Mac Tonight cocaine scandal never happened?
Mac tonight has always been a creeper though.
So you're just gonna act like the Mac Tonight cocaine scandal never happened?
Wait, as OP hasn't been updated. New page.
Charges are bolded.
Prosecutors also say Fogle obtained child porn, including videos showing the abuse of victims as young as 6.
Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
The first article in the OP is a little old, it looks like he will be getting much more than that. I think I saw somewhere minimum of 12 years. But the judge can give more at sentencing based on other aggravated factors, of which there are a lot.Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
If by uproar you mean joyous celebration for the former, then sure.Could you imagine the uproar if we discovered the ATT gal was an amateur porn star or if Flo was an opportunistic-cannibal?
Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
He only served kids...hmmmm...
Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
If this was part of a plea deal, he probably sung like a bird on his sources.
I'm guessing part of the plea bargain was that Fogle provides the feds with a list of every other scumbag involved in this mess. And, as others have pointed out, the first article in the OP is a little out of date now. The second article, the Reuters one, states a conviction of a maximum of twelve years.Wait a minute...
This guy has solicited sex with children. Has 3000 videos and 100,000 images, some number of which he was directly or indirectly involved in producing ... and he only gets 5 years? What?
Is Jared now the poster child for just completely throwing it all away? What a stupid, horrible, person he turned out to be.
Subway franchise owners/corporate have to be shitting their fucking pants right now.
Heartbreaking article, thank you for posting. I am pretty sure I know who that is unfortunately.While you're considering this, I urge you to read the following article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/m...tution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html
Given that Amy's pictures have spread so far and wide, it's entirely possible she will have to go through yet another visit from officers, detailing how Jared Fogle had copies of her photos on his drive. I particularly want the folks who think consumption of child pornography is somehow more acceptable than production to read this article. Both the law and psychology assure us that victims of child pornography are continually re-victimized by having their photos out there. If you're looking at them, you're as much of a shitbag as the guy that took them.
Five, twelve, either or between is too short. I suppose there's some justice in him never having a normal life when he gets out, but 1.4 Million to just 14 known victims, and not the countless others? That's not enough
What's really shocking is that it took until the 1970's for the U.S government to ban child pornography. Like, really, what possible reasoning could they have for thinking it was OK to view it before then? I mean, it would literally be sold alongside your usual smutty magazine as if it were normal. It's fucking ridiculous. Not that banning it has done much good. As that article states, it's so easy to find child porn and, as is the case with Amy and Nicole, their trauma will never be over. It truly is a sick, depraved world we live in.While you're considering this, I urge you to read the following article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/m...tution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html
What's really shocking is that it took until the 1970's for the U.S government to ban child pornography. Like, really, what possible reasoning could they have for thinking it was OK to view it before then? I mean, it would literally be sold alongside your usual smutty magazine as if it were normal. It's fucking ridiculous. Not that banning it has done much good. As that article states, it's so easy to find child porn and, as is the case with Amy and Nicole, their trauma will never be over. It truly is a sick, depraved world we live in.
While you're considering this, I urge you to read the following article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/m...tution-help-victims-of-child-pornography.html
Given that Amy's pictures have spread so far and wide, it's entirely possible she will have to go through yet another visit from officers, detailing how Jared Fogle had copies of her photos on his drive. I particularly want the folks who think consumption of child pornography is somehow more acceptable than production to read this article. Both the law and psychology assure us that victims of child pornography are continually re-victimized by having their photos out there. If you're looking at them, you're as much of a shitbag as the guy that took them.
What's really shocking is that it took until the 1970's for the U.S government to ban child pornography. Like, really, what possible reasoning could they have for thinking it was OK to view it before then? I mean, it would literally be sold alongside your usual smutty magazine as if it were normal. It's fucking ridiculous. Not that banning it has done much good. As that article states, it's so easy to find child porn and, as is the case with Amy and Nicole, their trauma will never be over. It truly is a sick, depraved world we live in.
I wasn't aware of that, but thank you.It took the UK until 1978 and there were still holes in it just as there were with "gray areas" with the US law.
Five, twelve, either or between is too short. I suppose there's some justice in him never having a normal life when he gets out, but 1.4 Million to just 14 known victims, and not the countless others? That's not enough
As the countless others come forward and are identified, they'll have an opportunity to seek further compensation. If the Amy and Vicky Act passes (call your Congressmen, it's already passed the Senate), defendants will be on the hook for lifetime psychiatric and medical care, life time work replacement value, etc.
As the countless others come forward and are identified, they'll have an opportunity to seek further compensation. If the Amy and Vicky Act passes (call your Congressmen, it's already passed the Senate), defendants will be on the hook for lifetime psychiatric and medical care, life time work replacement value, etc.
Wow, I heard that the guy heading up his charity had the child porn on his computer and they were checking Jared due to association. Didn't know it would include Jared as well.
Now I have that Jim Gaffigan voice in my head saying "eat fresh"
I feel like South Park is going to have a field day with this.
I feel like South Park is going to have a field day with this.
Jared Has Aides is actually on TV right now.
Ironically enough, his episode is on right now.
So you're just gonna act like the Mac Tonight cocaine scandal never happened?