These laptime comparisons suck.Angst said:Another good comparison would be one lap at Nordschleife with the Nissan GT-R '07, stock tyres (?).
Real world record is 7:29. I think most people have managed to squeeze just below that - 7:27 or so in GT5, my personal record so far is 7:31. Record was made on a semi-wet track though - and no fear of dying...
Could someone test that in F4 (when you get the game)?
I remember seeing a video of the Ferrari F1 car around Suzuka being almost spot-on, lap-time wise, with a real-life video of a Ferrari F1 car going around. The video was paraded around as proof of GT's realism. The end lap-time was similar, but only because the flaws of GT's modeling of the car and its physics just *happened* to balance out over the lap. At times, the car was further behind than in real-life, and at others it caught up.
Also, these comparisons assume the track is absolutely perfectly modeled, weather conditions were modeled to be exactly the same as they were when the lap was done in real-life, blah blah blah. Many things can distort lap times and both games are flawed in regards to physics. You want to get as close as possible to real-life, then go for a high-end sim like iRacing or something. These console games both come with compromises.
And I think a lot of people will be pleasantly surprised at the improvements in FM4. I'm sure some people will forever use FM2 and FM3 as their basis for comparisons, as thats the nature of fanboyism, but hopefully some of you will give it an honest, open-minded look.