Fox And Friends: Spongebob Is 'Pushing A Global Warming Agenda'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Something Wicked said:
Yeah, I know it's still a SpongeBob related thread, but I'm responding to a couple more of these misguided points:



That SF chronicle blog listed about 18 out of 1000s of scientific organizations- many of which require AGW to be an issue to ever receive the levels of funding they currently receive. The two I respect the most out of those, the American Chemical Society and American Physical Society, I know each have many members angry over the press statements supporting AGW from the organization heads. AGW certainly does not have unanimous support within these organizations (and within many others).

One press statement certainly does not speak for the 1,000s, 10,00s, or 100,000s of scientists and engineers within each group. For the last few decades, most scientists did not really care what their fellow scientists within the climatology areas claimed. Most thought "why bother criticizing fellow colleagues' entire bodies of work, besides climatology is not exactly my field anyway", even though they knew they had a far better understanding on how the universe operates than these "pseudo-scientist" climatologists. Now with the massive "climate taxes" being proposed throughout the world, other scientists are speaking up. But no, continue reading horribly biased blogs that claim "nearly all scientists support AGW theory" when that is far from reality.





I have done plenty of research (reading the actual scientific papers and IPCC reports, not some idiots' shitty blogs), and after looking at how temperature values are calculated from ice cores, temperature stations for the last 100 years, and even how temperatures are currently being measured and averaged, I say (as a chemical engineer) that very high degrees of error exist in these measurements, and thus the probability of AGW is actually quite low.
Click to expand...

So basically, you're outright dismissing the field of climatology in favour of listening to opinions from what amount to lay people on the subject?

Do you also dismiss psychology as a science of the mind, in favour of chemistry and physics?

If you've done such thorough research into the veracity and validity of global warming, do you mind presenting some of that sourced and linked information that highlights how unreliable that field of evidence is?
 
Something Wicked said:
That SF chronicle blog listed about 18 out of 1000s of scientific organizations- many of which require AGW to be an issue to ever receive the levels of funding they currently receive. The two I respect the most out of those, the American Chemical Society and American Physical Society, I know each have many members angry over the press statements supporting AGW from the organization heads. AGW certainly does not have unanimous support within these organizations (and within many others).
Click to expand...

So?

Something Wicked said:
One press statement certainly does not speak for the 1,000s, 10,00s, or 100,000s of scientists and engineers within each group. For the last few decades, most scientists did not really care what their fellow scientists within the climatology areas claimed. Most thought "why bother criticizing fellow colleagues' entire bodies of work, besides climatology is not exactly my field anyway", even though they knew they had a far better understanding on how the universe operates than these "pseudo-scientist" climatologists. Now with the massive "climate taxes" being proposed throughout the world, other scientists are speaking up. But no, continue reading horribly biased blogs that claim "nearly all scientists support AGW theory" when that is far from reality.
Click to expand...

Why should we care much what "scientists" think? Do you go to a "doctor" when you have a brain tumor or do you go to a specialist in brain tumors? Plenty of engineers believe in creationism. That lends nothing to the validity of creationism, just as non-acceptance of AGW by "scientists" doesn't imply the science of AGW is somehow lacking.

Something Wicked said:
I have done plenty of research (reading the actual scientific papers and IPCC reports, not some idiots' shitty blogs), and after looking at how temperature values are calculated from ice cores, temperature stations for the last 100 years, and even how temperatures are currently being measured and averaged, I say (as a chemical engineer) that very high degrees of error exist in these measurements, and thus the probability of AGW is actually quite low.
Click to expand...

Give one example. And don't post a whole god damn page of links and huge articles, articulate a problem and explain it.
 
sbsp.jpg


Children have been brainwashed by their shows for a long time already. Ironically, also by Fox themselves with The Simpsons, Family Guy and American Dad etc.

Sesame Street, does this ring any bells:

Tullies Triangle Club, complete with secret handshakes and private meetings. Of course intended to numb children to their fathers freemasonry as "talking about triangles with his club buddies" and nothing more.


One glaring example that springs to mind I saw recently in a kids show is the "Personified Owl that guards all the buried knowledge" in the buried library in Avatar: The Last Airbender. Those who have seen this episode know what I'm talking about.

Shit a child or even a teenager would shrug off and not think more than half a second about. Oh look, moving colours and Ang saves the day!
Anyone who knows what an Owl means in Freemasonry and the OTO would think differently about such a powerful piece of imagery, especially one given a human personification.

Fox like to pretend their halfway up the conspiracy nut tree, but their subliminal stuff in cartoons goes far to say they hang out in the same smokey rooms as the other guys.

Fox are fake shills anyway. They intentionally act stupid to white wash the actual argument. Same reason Palin the retard was installed to infiltrate the Tea Party, and now it's not even the same thing. Glenn Beck, same thing yet again. All stupid beyond belief intentionally, all ascribing to the same "side". To demoralize it. Trojan horses, if you will.

tl;dr some global warming bullshit in your kids shows is the least of your concern. Sit down and watch one of their shows sometime and see what they get told to think and do.

Take control of a generation, you take control of the world. Your kids are the tools.
 
SiriusTexra said:
"a scientific fact well understood for over a century."

Stopped reading.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure HuffPo was referring to the greenhouse effect, which does meet that description...
 
Why is Pearl, a sperm whale, only slightly bigger than her crab father and far smaller than David Hasselhoff?
This is even worse than the scale issues in Rango, where foxes and bobcats were the same size as small lizards.
 
DonMigs85 said:
Why is Pearl, a sperm whale, only slightly bigger than her crab father and far smaller than David Hasselhoff?
This is even worse than the scale issues in Rango, where foxes and bobcats were the same size as small lizards.
Click to expand...

She's just a teenager!

I'm actually surprised that your main issue wasn't how Krabs somehow conceived a whale.
 
Ookami-kun said:
She's just a teenager!

I'm actually surprised that your main issue wasn't how Krabs somehow conceived a whale.
Click to expand...
I always assumed she was adopted... But apparently that's not the case?
 
Something Wicked said:
Yeah, I know it's still a SpongeBob related thread, but I'm responding to a couple more of these misguided points:



That SF chronicle blog listed about 18 out of 1000s of scientific organizations- many of which require AGW to be an issue to ever receive the levels of funding they currently receive. The two I respect the most out of those, the American Chemical Society and American Physical Society, I know each have many members angry over the press statements supporting AGW from the organization heads. AGW certainly does not have unanimous support within these organizations (and within many others).

One press statement certainly does not speak for the 1,000s, 10,00s, or 100,000s of scientists and engineers within each group. For the last few decades, most scientists did not really care what their fellow scientists within the climatology areas claimed. Most thought "why bother criticizing fellow colleagues' entire bodies of work, besides climatology is not exactly my field anyway", even though they knew they had a far better understanding on how the universe operates than these "pseudo-scientist" climatologists. Now with the massive "climate taxes" being proposed throughout the world, other scientists are speaking up. But no, continue reading horribly biased blogs that claim "nearly all scientists support AGW theory" when that is far from reality.





I have done plenty of research (reading the actual scientific papers and IPCC reports, not some idiots' shitty blogs), and after looking at how temperature values are calculated from ice cores, temperature stations for the last 100 years, and even how temperatures are currently being measured and averaged, I say (as a chemical engineer) that very high degrees of error exist in these measurements, and thus the probability of AGW is actually quite low.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm going to need a little bit more than your hand-waving of the AAAS, the National Science Academy, and the entire field of climatology as proof that you know what you're talking about. How low of a probability are we talking?
 
Amir0x said:
I think the more severe problem is that Spongebob pushes a pro porn agenda, and is that really appropriate for our kids?
Click to expand...
got damn

Gary straight caught him in the act, it's teaching kids about the real world

SmokyDave said:
....


Shit.
Click to expand...
OK, I have to ask, is that you in your avatar pictures? You seem to cycle pictures of the same chill dude
 
DonMigs85 said:
Why is Pearl, a sperm whale, only slightly bigger than her crab father and far smaller than David Hasselhoff?
This is even worse than the scale issues in Rango, where foxes and bobcats were the same size as small lizards.
Click to expand...
Nah, biggest problem of scale in Rango was how they both had built things out of human sized junk but also had machined things that were animal scale.
 
The_Technomancer said:
Nah, biggest problem of scale in Rango was how they both had built things out of human sized junk but also had machined things that were animal scale.
Click to expand...

Replication!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

merry new years my friends
Social Spoilers Community 
9
698
GigaBowser replied
  • Poll
Apple is reportedly planning a design overhaul for iOS, iPadOS, and macOS
49
3K
deriks replied
Do you have close friends? When's the last time you made one?
2
81
2K
Coconutt replied
TV Line speculates that The Simpsons and Family Guy may be ending their runs on Fox to move to Disney+ and Hulu
6
1K
ManaByte replied
Took a business trip to London, Paris, and Amsterdam. I came back with one big question for my European friends.
2 3
114
7K
Kamina replied
Top Bottom